"SPECTRE" Appreciation Topic (...and why you think the 24th Bond film was the best spy film of 2015)

17810121327

Comments

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    The complaints about the empty this or that in SP amuses me considering the empty subway in SF in London in the middle of the day.
    Agreed. That was nonsensical too, but the plausible argument there was that it was an empty car sitting on a supply track which Silva detonated. I would have preferred it be populated there too, like the one in Die Hard 3, truth be told.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    bondjames wrote: »
    The complaints about the empty this or that in SP amuses me considering the empty subway in SF in London in the middle of the day.
    Agreed. That was nonsensical too, but the plausible argument there was that it was an empty car sitting on a supply track which Silva detonated. I would have preferred it be populated there too, like the one in Die Hard 3, truth be told.

    I have to rewatch it, wasn't it in motion when falling through the floor?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,959
    The train is definitely in motion. He blows the hole in the wall, and the train follows a few seconds later, meaning that it was most certainly traveling along the tracks.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    Remind me, are we talking about the empty train car that crashes through the ceiling, or the tube station itself?

    For the record @BondJasonBond006, I am not one to trash Spectre. It is still one of my favorite Bond films.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    It was in motion. I don't know enough about how these things work so can't comment on whether such empty cars can be controlled from the main control tower. If so, then that explains why it was 'moving' (they could have been operating it remotely).

    Still, I agree that this was one of those moments like the SP ones which did 'take me out of it' and should have been avoided ideally. Just not necessary in my view.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    bondjames wrote: »
    It was in motion. I don't know enough about how these things work so can't comment on whether such empty cars can be controlled from the main control tower. If so, then that explains why it was 'moving' (they could have been operating it remotely).

    Still, I agree that this was one of those moments like the SP ones which did 'take me out of it' and should have been avoided ideally. Just not necessary in my view.
    What was funny was that in the trailer, the train had no conductor. The one that we see in the film is CGI.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    jake24 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    It was in motion. I don't know enough about how these things work so can't comment on whether such empty cars can be controlled from the main control tower. If so, then that explains why it was 'moving' (they could have been operating it remotely).

    Still, I agree that this was one of those moments like the SP ones which did 'take me out of it' and should have been avoided ideally. Just not necessary in my view.
    What was funny was that in the trailer, the train had no conductor. The one that we see in the film is CGI.

    Empty trains are a normal occurrence on the tube as they take the amount of rolling stock off the line after rush hour.

    To have one in the middle of rush hour (as according to Q we are in the middle of it)is rather rare unless there's a fault with the train.

    What is bollocks is a) no driver in the crashing train and b) the gormless woman sat at the back of train.

    No driver would simply never happen (the only place this would occur is the DLR) and TfL being told to make £2.5bil of cuts means that they haven't got spare staff to be sitting in the back of trains.

    But of course now we know the films are linked Silva's plan is less preposterous as SPECTRE clearly as numerous agents working in TfL, the police and MI6 to assist him.

    Which makes way more sense than just shooting M in the face when she gets out of her car.

    Although an intriguing thought has just struck me: do we think Silva pitched his plan to blow up the tube to Ernst as the UK terrorist attack to get them onside for Nine Eyes and his killing of M is an incidental little pleasure?

    Rather like Simon Gruber nicking the gold but killing Mclane as a bonus?

  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited May 2016 Posts: 10,591
    jake24 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    It was in motion. I don't know enough about how these things work so can't comment on whether such empty cars can be controlled from the main control tower. If so, then that explains why it was 'moving' (they could have been operating it remotely).

    Still, I agree that this was one of those moments like the SP ones which did 'take me out of it' and should have been avoided ideally. Just not necessary in my view.
    What was funny was that in the trailer, the train had no conductor. The one that we see in the film is CGI.

    Empty trains are a normal occurrence on the tube as they take the amount of rolling stock off the line after rush hour.

    To have one in the middle of rush hour (as according to Q we are in the middle of it)is rather rare unless there's a fault with the train.

    What is bollocks is a) no driver in the crashing train and b) the gormless woman sat at the back of train.

    No driver would simply never happen (the only place this would occur is the DLR) and TfL being told to make £2.5bil of cuts means that they haven't got spare staff to be sitting in the back of trains.

    But of course now we know the films are linked Silva's plan is less preposterous as SPECTRE clearly as numerous agents working in TfL, the police and MI6 to assist him.

    Which makes way more sense than just shooting M in the face when she gets out of her car.

    Although an intriguing thought has just struck me: do we think Silva pitched his plan to blow up the tube to Ernst as the UK terrorist attack to get them onside for Nine Eyes and his killing of M is an incidental little pleasure?

    Rather like Simon Gruber nicking the gold but killing Mclane as a bonus?
    Post Spectre, this definitely occurred to me as well. ESB couldn't care less about Silva's personal vendetta against M. He let him do whatever he wanted as long as it resulted in the benefit of the organization and the tormentation of Bond's life.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    I've always felt that to be the case, since I saw SP and the retcon thing kicked in.

    Not about the tube explosion necessarily (I always felt that was just part of his escape plan, because otherwise why not ensure that you create maximum mayhem by crashing an 'occupied' train) but more about the NOC list etc.

    All of the stuff Silva does outside of wanting to kill M is Spectre driven. M is just something personal he gets out of it. A bonus.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    bondjames wrote: »
    I've always felt that to be the case, since I saw SP and the retcon thing kicked in.

    Not about the tube explosion necessarily (I always felt that was just part of his escape plan, because otherwise why not ensure that you create maximum mayhem by crashing an 'occupied' train) but more about the NOC list etc.

    All of the stuff Silva does outside of wanting to kill M is Spectre driven. M is just something personal he gets out of it. A bonus.

    I concur!
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    chrisisall wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    I've always felt that to be the case, since I saw SP and the retcon thing kicked in.

    Not about the tube explosion necessarily (I always felt that was just part of his escape plan, because otherwise why not ensure that you create maximum mayhem by crashing an 'occupied' train) but more about the NOC list etc.

    All of the stuff Silva does outside of wanting to kill M is Spectre driven. M is just something personal he gets out of it. A bonus.

    I concur!

    Well done us for untangling it all.

    Doing the hard work so P&W don't have to.
  • edited May 2016 Posts: 1,817
    I find SP's action to be very uneven. I highly applaud the helicopter fight, train fight and reflectively speaking I can see some merit to the boat chase (for it's general beauty and glamour, but there's no tension in it at all).

    The snow chase and Spectre shootout are very average and the car chase is just failed potential in every sense. And to think that they poured so much money into the snow and car chases only for them to turn out rather mediocre!

    Well actually, I find most of SP to be very uneven. A lot is good. A lot is not so good.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited May 2016 Posts: 8,392
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.
  • I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    I find SP's action to be very uneven. I highly applaud the helicopter fight, train fight and reflectively speaking I can see some merit to the boat chase (for it's general beauty and glamour, but there's no tension in it at all).

    The snow chase and Spectre shootout are very average and the car chase is just failed potential in every sense. And to think that they poured so much money into the snow and car chases only for them to turn out rather mediocre!

    Well actually, I find most of SP to be very uneven. A lot is good. A lot is not so good.

    Agree 100% apart from the finale with the magic laser guided Walther which is utterly lame.
  • edited May 2016 Posts: 1,817
    I find SP's action to be very uneven. I highly applaud the helicopter fight, train fight and reflectively speaking I can see some merit to the boat chase (for it's general beauty and glamour, but there's no tension in it at all).

    The snow chase and Spectre shootout are very average and the car chase is just failed potential in every sense. And to think that they poured so much money into the snow and car chases only for them to turn out rather mediocre!

    Well actually, I find most of SP to be very uneven. A lot is good. A lot is not so good.

    Agree 100% apart from the finale with the magic laser guided Walther which is utterly lame.

    Yes... I think we all agree that the divine laser is ridiculous.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.
  • edited May 2016 Posts: 4,325
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    I've never felt that about the QoS car chase. I think it's the best in the series. Never found it hard to comprehend what's going on in the chase. It wasn't till I came on here that I had any inkling that people had trouble with it. There are Alfas chasing Bond in his Aston, they head towards the quarry, they continue chasing Bond, Bond disposes of them by his driving and then finally shoots the guy in the car alongside him - there's not much to have to follow. Always loved the way it starts with the close-up on Bond's eye and the ammunition going into the guns and then CACOPHONY!
  • I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.

    CR does a better job than QoS, because Campbell actually got involved in the action. Forster had no interest in action, he just left it all for the second unit to work out for themselves. That's why very piece of action in the film starts in the most abrupt way possible.

    I do however think that the sinking house scene in CR is another example of this. Water starts bursting forth and everything starts happening so quickly that its hard to know where the danger is for Bond. I would have liked one shot looking down through the house, that's shows where the baddies are and what the obsticales are that Bond has to overcome to get to Vesper. The geography of that building is a little hard to nail down, and a little help in that regard would've really improved the scene I think.
  • edited May 2016 Posts: 1,817
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.

    CR does a better job than QoS, because Campbell actually got involved in the action. Forster had no interest in action, he just left it all for the second unit to work out for themselves. That's why every piece of action in the film starts in the most abrupt way possible.

    I do however think that the sinking house scene in CR is another example of this. Water starts bursting forth and everything starts happening so quickly that its hard to know where the danger is for Bond. I would have liked one shot looking down through the house, that's shows where the baddies are and what the obsticales are that Bond has to overcome to get to Vesper. The geography of that building is a little hard to nail down, and a little help in that regard would've really improved the scene I think.

    That was also a big problem with QOS, it didn't know how to sit still.

    I do think that the sinking house in CR is one of the few weak links of the film as well although maybe not because of the reasons you've mentioned, I just find it anticlimactic.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.

    CR does a better job than QoS, because Campbell actually got involved in the action. Forster had no interest in action, he just left it all for the second unit to work out for themselves. That's why very piece of action in the film starts in the most abrupt way possible.

    I do however think that the sinking house scene in CR is another example of this. Water starts bursting forth and everything starts happening so quickly that its hard to know where the danger is for Bond. I would have liked one shot looking down through the house, that's shows where the baddies are and what the obsticales are that Bond has to overcome to get to Vesper. The geography of that building is a little hard to nail down, and a little help in that regard would've really improved the scene I think.

    @Mendes you make some valid points particularly about QOS but just because the action is flawed in the other films it doesn't automatically follow that the action in SP is good.

    The PTS helicopter is very solid and the train fight is excellent. But, despite some nice shots, the car chase, plane crash are decidedly average.

  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.

    CR does a better job than QoS, because Campbell actually got involved in the action. Forster had no interest in action, he just left it all for the second unit to work out for themselves. That's why very piece of action in the film starts in the most abrupt way possible.

    I do however think that the sinking house scene in CR is another example of this. Water starts bursting forth and everything starts happening so quickly that its hard to know where the danger is for Bond. I would have liked one shot looking down through the house, that's shows where the baddies are and what the obsticales are that Bond has to overcome to get to Vesper. The geography of that building is a little hard to nail down, and a little help in that regard would've really improved the scene I think.

    @Mendes you make some valid points particularly about QOS but just because the action is flawed in the other films it doesn't automatically follow that the action in SP is good.

    The PTS helicopter is very solid and the train fight is excellent. But, despite some nice shots, the car chase, plane crash are decidedly average.

    Not in my view. The car chase and alpine chase are both standout sequences as far as I am concerned. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I think the old way that action used to be shot (during the Glen era especially) is superior, and I view all the action in SP (including the terrific opener) as a return to that. It's clear, it's clean, and IMO a more mature approach. Some call the plane chase telegraphed, but personally I'd rather be a few seconds ahead of the action than half a second behind it.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    Those first 2 acts are absolutely stellar IMO. A gorgeous mix of old school intrigue and OTT action. Everything is handled brilliantly, such class. The fact that the third act is merely mediocre hardly ruins the experience for me.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.

    CR does a better job than QoS, because Campbell actually got involved in the action. Forster had no interest in action, he just left it all for the second unit to work out for themselves. That's why very piece of action in the film starts in the most abrupt way possible.

    I do however think that the sinking house scene in CR is another example of this. Water starts bursting forth and everything starts happening so quickly that its hard to know where the danger is for Bond. I would have liked one shot looking down through the house, that's shows where the baddies are and what the obsticales are that Bond has to overcome to get to Vesper. The geography of that building is a little hard to nail down, and a little help in that regard would've really improved the scene I think.

    @Mendes you make some valid points particularly about QOS but just because the action is flawed in the other films it doesn't automatically follow that the action in SP is good.

    The PTS helicopter is very solid and the train fight is excellent. But, despite some nice shots, the car chase, plane crash are decidedly average.

    Not in my view. The car chase and alpine chase are both standout sequences as far as I am concerned. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I think the old way that action used to be shot (during the Glen era especially) is superior, and I view all the action in SP (including the terrific opener) as a return to that. It's clear, it's clean, and IMO a more mature approach. Some call the plane chase telegraphed, but personally I'd rather be a few seconds ahead of the action than half a second behind it.
    I don't have a problem with the 'way it's shot' necessarily. That's not the problem. It just lacks tension. No spark. No intelligence in anything that happens.

    I come back to the TSWLM Lotus chase which is similarly filmed. Watch that and the SP plane chase back to back. The earlier film is tension filled for me. You feel Bond is in danger. Where's the tension in the plane sequence? We knew Hinx wasn't going to shoot Madeline because she had just been introduced into the film. We knew Bond wasn't in danger because he had the stronger item in the chase (plane vs car anyone?). Moreover, Bond is the aggressor here.

    In the TSWLM chase we had the Lotus skidding around beautifully and the helicopter weaving in and out very nicely. In SP, the plane is just following them - no real great maneuvering here.

    Additionally, Anya's fear in that chase added to the tension, and contrasted with Bond's cool. In SP we have "Can't any of you speak!!!"

    It was just stupid all round imho.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,713
    @bondjames the first time I heard that line from Madeleine, I wondered what language she spoke because it didn't sound english at all. It wasn't until I switched on the subtitles on my Blu Ray that I realized it was actually english that came out of her mouth.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Agreed @DaltonCraig007. Her accent and delivery was a bit off in quite a few places, but particularly there, and also when she loses it on him after the chase ("Argh. Don't touch me!!! Get away from me!!!"). They should have got her to redo those lines in particular imho.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    bondjames wrote: »
    I love all the action in SP. Its very mature compared to the usual slap and tickle fare in the other Craig films.

    Not trying to be rude, but... eh?

    I find the action in the Craig era to be very slapdash. Most of it looks like it was shot with GoPros. I never feel like I can enjoy the action, I'm so busy trying to follow it. Especially in the first 2, they don't hold on shots for long enough, and they're always to close to the action for my liking. One notable exception is when Bond leapt from one crane to the next during the parkour in CR. I liked that bit because they slowed down for a second and actually showcased the stunt.

    The QoS car chase is one of the worst chases in the series IMO because its often difficult to tell where the cars are in relation to one another. We get an extreme close up of someone shorting a gun and have no idea what he is shooting. I'm so busy trying to work out what's going on because the film doesn't give us enough visual context. Sure I know the basics: some cars are chasing Bond. But when they are skidding around bends, dodging oncoming traffic, etc. It would really help to have one wide reference shot to cut to.

    Very good, I understand where you are coming from now. I collectively find all but one or maybe two action sequences in QOS visually appalling. The car chase is an awful way to begin the movie, and I agree entirely about what you say regarding visual context. I couldn't get anything out of it and after it was all done all I could think was: "I saw some cars and guns," and that made it feel very generic somehow. As I think Roger himself said "just like a commercial of the action".

    But regarding CR I must disagree. Everything else about the parkour chase was thrilling too, IMO.

    CR does a better job than QoS, because Campbell actually got involved in the action. Forster had no interest in action, he just left it all for the second unit to work out for themselves. That's why very piece of action in the film starts in the most abrupt way possible.

    I do however think that the sinking house scene in CR is another example of this. Water starts bursting forth and everything starts happening so quickly that its hard to know where the danger is for Bond. I would have liked one shot looking down through the house, that's shows where the baddies are and what the obsticales are that Bond has to overcome to get to Vesper. The geography of that building is a little hard to nail down, and a little help in that regard would've really improved the scene I think.

    @Mendes you make some valid points particularly about QOS but just because the action is flawed in the other films it doesn't automatically follow that the action in SP is good.

    The PTS helicopter is very solid and the train fight is excellent. But, despite some nice shots, the car chase, plane crash are decidedly average.

    Not in my view. The car chase and alpine chase are both standout sequences as far as I am concerned. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I think the old way that action used to be shot (during the Glen era especially) is superior, and I view all the action in SP (including the terrific opener) as a return to that. It's clear, it's clean, and IMO a more mature approach. Some call the plane chase telegraphed, but personally I'd rather be a few seconds ahead of the action than half a second behind it.
    I don't have a problem with the 'way it's shot' necessarily. That's not the problem. It just lacks tension. No spark. No intelligence in anything that happens.

    I come back to the TSWLM Lotus chase which is similarly filmed. Watch that and the SP plane chase back to back. The earlier film is tension filled for me. You feel Bond is in danger. Where's the tension in the plane sequence? We knew Hinx wasn't going to shoot Madeline because she had just been introduced into the film. We knew Bond wasn't in danger because he had the stronger item in the chase (plane vs car anyone?).

    In the TSWLM chase we had the Lotus skidding around beautifully and the helicopter weaving in and out very nicely. In SP, the plane is just following them - no real great maneuvering here.

    Additionally, Anya's fear in that chase added to the tension, and contrasted with Bond's cool. In SP we have "Can't any of you speak!!!"

    It was just stupid all round imho.

    I would have to say that making a direct comparison like that is a little unfair. In one instance Bond is being persued in the other he is doing the pursuing. It's a completely different scenerio, with a completely different intended goal.

    Although I will agree with you, the Lotus chase is by far superior, if I have to compare the two. I wasn't saying that the plane chase was better than anything the series had to offer, just that it was effective in the film it is in.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    I agree with you @Mendes4Lyfe that a direct comparison is a bit unfair. I was just using it to illustrate that the SP chase could and should have been done better, and what elements were causing the relative lack of tension for me.

    The CR parkour is another example of how to do a tension filled scene. That is still by far the best action setpiece in the Craig era imho, followed by the SF pretitles - if you like the wide shot style.

    For closer quarters Bourne style, the QoS car chase is a clear winner.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    bondjames wrote: »
    The CR parkour is another example of how to do a tension filled scene. That is still by far the best action setpiece in the Craig era imho, followed by the SF pretitles.

    :-O

    Sorry, @bondjames I respect your opinion greatly, but I can't quite agree with you on the parkour sequence being the best. Apart from a few bits where Craig has to use his brains to figure out a shortcut, I would have left about half of it on the cutting room floor. That thing would've worked just as well at half the length, and there would have been less reason to believe that Bond is a secret Kryptonian.
Sign In or Register to comment.