It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The dialog between John and Jack sounds great, however 'Let's go kill some scumbags' doesn't bode well for those of us (including me) hoping for an R-rated film. I do love the line at the end
Has this been posted?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_3848&feature=iv&src_vid=FRLwoMXaZHQ&v=oZlGkBJj4Ms
Still, love Die Hard so I'll probably give it a look.
The way he says it, where his face is just barely shown as he's turning around, makes me think this'll go the way of Live Free or Die Hard, and that it'll have an unrated DVD that gives us all the foul language that we want from John McClane.
It better be at least on par with the last one. Do you think it is @doubleonothing?
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=98405
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=98410
John McClane should NOT be the 007 of Plainfield, New Jersey. :-w
That's kind of how I feel. I know he is a man against the odds, but I need a smaller, more believable setting than this.
I don't see any need to have his son fighting with him, I'd have preferred it if his son was captured and he had to rescue him. Solo.
The problem is they seem to have thought that the scale was too small and so they threw in some plot about Mcclane saving America.
I think the airport setting of 2 was a step down from the thundering high rise.
I think the problem is that he's gotten too much help in the sequels. Fair enough Samuel Jackson was badass but what made the original great was that this regular cop was forced to be a Rambo type one man army.
I did like Die Hard 4 (especially the directoers cut) even though the scale was pretty big, so I still have faith in this one.
I'll give this one a shot in theaters, of course, but I'm not terribly excited about it. Trailers for films and games need to blow me away after that for me to spend money on them; I've been let down way too many times this year to waste any more money.
If you watch the rocket grenade Russian roulette ending for Die Hard 3, it is everything but anticlimactic. I still don't know why they didn't go with it. So much more thrilling than anything we got.
But like Dirty Harry, he could come back and the audience would know that somehow it wouldn't be the end for him. But yeah, in general, I agree with the above comments.
I actually just got around to checking out the second TV spot for 'A Good Day To Die Hard,' and it's just the same as the trailer and other TV spot: same shots and everything, so nothing more to say about the film. Looks okay.
I think I like the ending to DHWAV because that was the one I grew up watching as a kid. However, I do like the Russian roulette ending better and would prefer that one if they would've dropped the line about John losing his job.
They could have just ended the films as a trilogy - John loses his job, but gets the bad guy - or they could have had him in another situation such as the first two films that results in him saving a lot of people and getting his job back.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=98324
I love how comingsoon.net 's ads on their videos say 'you can skip in 45 seconds', and the video is 50 seconds long
:-L