It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It's fun talking about truth, wisdom, conscience, The Matrix, ... but in the end, none of those things put food on the table, pharmaceuticals in your blood or James Bond on the white cinema canvas. We owe all of that to the very same technology which exists as the appendix of science. I love me a bit of stoner philosophy as much as the next guy, I don't mind discussing Constructivism and such, I am very much into conversations about demarcation problems, Occam's razor, determinism versus indeterminism... In fact, I acknowledge, no doubt much to the surprise of some of you, the meaningfulness of all of these things. But science, no matter how cold, cerebral and unemotionally relying on logic and reasoning as many think it is, cannot be superseded by simple phrases which one philosopher came up with one day as the basis for a book and which nowadays gets printed on students' t-shirts more than anything else.
If these clowns running amok prove more of a nuisance, you lot may find yourself carrying sharp objects too just in case some lessons need to be learned by those Joker wannabes.
Oh, the #irony!
It boils down to have enough evidence to hold something as true. Not personal belief or experience. Your personal experience is completely worthless to determine such matter.
No.
But in any case... How do you define a ghost and why do you think ghosts exist?
And you misunderstood my question. You have an experience of the evidence, don t you? How do you know you are not imagining it?
If ghost hunters used the same methodology as traffic police, things would be much clearer.
"Ignorance is the cause of fear."
That's a cop out: no such thing as evidence? As @patb said there's data that we can record and gather and that exists beyond personal perception/experiences. You are defending your claims that you saw ghosts by... claiming you saw ghosts. That's called a circular argument.
How do you know it exists if you don t perceive it?
I never saw an atom yet I know for a fact they exist. There are stars in the sky that don't exist anymore yet you can still see their light. Perception and evidence are two different things. But we're far from the ghosts you saw or think you saw... and apparently could even define their nature.
Why would I even need to? We have proof of the existence of the atom. We can even split them! So now since this is about ghosts what evidence can you bring that they exist?
And can you be both at the same time?