It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I did think Craig looked wierd in the GB. Y'know, you might be onto something there @marketto007
If it is CGI, I don't think they'll use it in the film.
I'd have to agree I don't think Fiennes comments rule out him being M and will be disappointed if he's shown as the big bad behind the curtain at the end, Bardem is the villain and that should be enough, I really hope RF is the new M as he's perfect for the role.
As for the GB in Skyfall I'm pretty sure it will be at the beginning and I can't wait to see it there because Craig has earned it but I saw it's reasoning for being positioned where it was with CR & QOS.
If you hadn't of incorporated it into the titles then it shouldn't have been anywhere else it just wouldn't have made sense at the beginning and as QOS picks up straight after CR and to me was a continuation of that story so using it at the end made perfect sense whether people feel miffed they didn't get their usual fix.
Saw this at Film Score Monthly.
I'd only have two nickels.
So all that "it was at the end in QOS for a reason! It'll be at the start now!!!" was apparently BS.
qos had gun barrel at end for a reason, to finish both casino and quantum. so skyfall is a new chapter why would it end with it .
Owen, please can i ask where you are getting the information that the gun barrel is at the end. I just dont see how sam mendes or anyone else would let that happen. If its at the end, they clearly havent listened to all the bond fans and that is not good.
Im not saying your liying or anything. I jsut cannot get my head around it at the end.
Heres why
Because it makes it a little less classic Bond. But still looking forward to it! :)
B.) The movie still looks kick ass, and according to reviews, it is.
C.) It is a little extreme to hate a film because a 20 second clip is in a different spot.
Only one person has twitted about this. It might not be true. Get yourself over to the SKYFALL clip thread and watch a brilliant 51sec clip. Full of tense drama...that might cheer you up!
Look, i understand the film is the main thing Yes. Im glad its getting amazing reviews, but the no gun barrel opening makes it less exciting. Michael wilson said why fix something if it ain broken, well they have just ruined it for me. 50th anniversary aswell. I need answers why its at the end.
I care abotu the gun barrel alot. I love it when it opens on a bond film. It sso epic and exciting. Now i wont get that when i see skyfall. I jsut wont. Well, i am sad by it anyway. It realy means that much to me, theres nothing wrong with that. You might not have been worried about it for four years. Its been on my mind for FOUR YEARS. no wondder im in this state lol.