› › ›

Spectre Gunbarrel ***Spoilers***

1…910121415…53

Comments

  • jamesdutjamesdut
    Posts: 95
    In that imdb review last month I'm sure it said the gun barrel was back at the beginning
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    Posts: 655
    fanbond123 wrote:
    There's always bittorrent in a few months time! :))

    Make your voice heard and avoid the cinema release and illegally download it in a few months time! Yes, the voice of the internet generation has spoken.

    NO GUN BARREL AT THE BEGINNING - NO SEE FILM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :D

    I wouldnt go that far lol. Im still looking forward to what is said to be the best bond film ever. Gun barrel just looses some excitment.
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    Posts: 655
    jamesdut wrote:
    In that imdb review last month I'm sure it said the gun barrel was back at the beginning

    No, IMDB is just speculating up till the films launch.
  • xolanixolani
    Posts: 130
    Shardlake wrote:
    it's all very amusing watching some of you throwing your toys out of your pram, it's not life and death it's a fucking film, now if it is causing this much distress you really need to question how interesting your life really is and maybe find yourself something other than Bond to stimulate yourself, because if this is really causing some of you to cry you need help!

    Well put. :)
  • OwenDavianOwenDavian
    Posts: 214
    This seems to be a strange new tradition then....
  • OwenDavianOwenDavian
    Posts: 214
    Now if we dont get dancing naked girls I'll really be disappointed! :p
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    edited October 2012 Posts: 655
    xolani wrote:
    Shardlake wrote:
    it's all very amusing watching some of you throwing your toys out of your pram, it's not life and death it's a fucking film, now if it is causing this much distress you really need to question how interesting your life really is and maybe find yourself something other than Bond to stimulate yourself, because if this is really causing some of you to cry you need help!

    Well put. :)

    Shardlake, Bond is my life. I am that much of a fan, sorry if that seems stupid to you.

  • jamesdutjamesdut
    Posts: 95
    If they want to put all the gun barrels at the end for the Craig films then why put it after the pre credit sequence for casino that's not consistent as that's seem to now be the plan. I meant the preview screening Gareth sure I read it was at the beginning so they changed since
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited October 2012 Posts: 11,119
    xolani wrote:
    fanbond123 wrote:
    Okay... I know this is a bit crazy or radical but someone needs to go to the London premiere and hold up a banner:

    "Boycott this film until Eon put the gun barrel back at the beginning of the films."

    Perhaps a few less words than that. LOL But you will get some great attention from the media. It will take a bit of courage to do but heck, someone could do it!

    OMG. You people should really take a step back and consider what you are posting.

    Boycot the film? Seriously? This is a throwback to those "Craig is not Bond" days. And then they delivered Casino Royale. Well, lets hope that history repeats itself.

    It's not only that, but hearing comments like 'weirdly dour movie', 'macabre main titles' and 'no gunbarrel at the start' sounds more like a movie from Christopher Nolan's revived Batman-saga.

    I just wonder how much trendsetting the Bond producers want to be. Moreover, ever since Daniel Craig became the new Bond I sometimes have the feeling all the people involved in a Bond movie are trying a bit too hard to make the perfect Bond film.

    It's not bad to have a bit of a formularic approach to a franchise film. 'Q' back? Fantastic. But not an old 'Q', but a young wizzkid. Well, I can accept that. But what's wrong with an older 'Q'? You just don't want to have it anymore, because it has been done for such a long time? I find that a lacklustre argument. Albert Finney would have played a marvellous 'Q' no?

    Boycotting 'Skyfall'?? Bullocks. I will never do that :-). But you have to understand, Bond fans are fans. They are passionate.
  • DCisaredDCisared Liverpool
    Posts: 1,329
    OwenDavian wrote:
    Now if we dont get dancing naked girls I'll really be disappointed! :p
    bond walking through mirrored corridors apparently
  • DarthBorkDarthBork
    Posts: 114
    Gareth00789 wrote:
    xolani wrote:
    Shardlake wrote:
    it's all very amusing watching some of you throwing your toys out of your pram, it's not life and death it's a fucking film, now if it is causing this much distress you really need to question how interesting your life really is and maybe find yourself something other than Bond to stimulate yourself, because if this is really causing some of you to cry you need help!

    Well put. :)

    Shardlake, Bond is my life. I am that much of a fan, sorry if that seems stupid to you.

    You can still be a fan, but even so it's really no big deal, sure I'd like it too. But if it means that much you, you can always find one of those YouTube videos with all the gunbarrels and sit in a dark room on a loop? That may calm you.

  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    edited October 2012 Posts: 655
    I just doesnt make sence.. no opening gun barrel. Im off to bed now as i just keep repeating myself about it, sorry guys. I am off to cry myself to sleep. bye. lol

    Someone said on the forum its just a film, its not to me. Its more than a film when its bond. If you know what i mean.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    edited October 2012 Posts: 12,837
    That's the thing. It's so pointless.

    It's just... why? Why bother moving it? There's literally no reason not to and they knew that most fans preferred it at the start anyway.

    Like I've said, it won't ruin the film but it is a let down.
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    edited October 2012 Posts: 655
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    That's the thing. It's so pointless.

    It's just... why? Why bother moving it? There's literally no reason not to and they knew that most fans preferred it at the start anyway.

    Like I've said, it won't ruin the film but it is a let down.

    Exactly. Its done so well since dr no. Why change now. It should never ever change,

    Ian Fleming will be turning in his grave. I just know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • fanbond123fanbond123
    Posts: 1,661
    The gun barrel at the end of the film is the worst thing in the entirety of human history.

    I don't think that is an unreasonable comment to make!
  • jamesdutjamesdut
    Posts: 95
    I can see in future years the gun barrels being restored to the start on future DVD releases to sell more copies of the films offering something new to fans lol
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    Posts: 655
    50th anniversary aswell. How could they!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-S :(( :(( :((
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Personally, I want a Bond 'event', which includes the Gunbarrel. No Gunbarrel, and I wait for the DVD to watch a 'movie' at home. Like I did with QoS. I tolerated that with NSNA, not with an EON film.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    edited October 2012 Posts: 12,837
    I'm really disappointed but I think boycotting the film, etc, is a step too far.
    Gareth00789 wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    That's the thing. It's so pointless.

    It's just... why? Why bother moving it? There's literally no reason not to and they knew that most fans preferred it at the start anyway.

    Like I've said, it won't ruin the film but it is a let down.

    Exactly. Its done so well since dr no. Why change now. It should never ever change,

    Ian Fleming will be turning in his grave. I just know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Well Fleming apparently hated Dr No so I'm not so sure about that.

    Cubby Broccoli probably is though!
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    edited October 2012 Posts: 655
    Do you guys think well will all forget the gun barrel at the begining and just enjoy the film. Its only a few seconds of thrill i suppose, but still..... im in total shock and disgust.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    Posts: 12,837
    Gareth00789 wrote:
    Do you guys think well will all forget the gun barrel at the begining and just enjoy the film. Its only a few seconds of thrill i suppose, but still. ...

    I'll probably enjoy the film anyway but watching the film open without it will piss me off a bit.
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    edited October 2012 Posts: 655
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    I'm really disappointed but I think boycotting the film, etc, is a step too far.
    Gareth00789 wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    That's the thing. It's so pointless.

    It's just... why? Why bother moving it? There's literally no reason not to and they knew that most fans preferred it at the start anyway.

    Like I've said, it won't ruin the film but it is a let down.

    Exactly. Its done so well since dr no. Why change now. It should never ever change,

    Ian Fleming will be turning in his grave. I just know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Well Fleming apparently hated Dr No so I'm not so sure about that.

    Cubby Broccoli probably is though!

    He haited dr no., Did he?? whys that. Dr no i think is one of the best bond films ever. Dr no is my favourite sean connery film.

    I JUST MEAN THE GUN BARRELHAS BEEN OPENING SINCE DR NO. not talking about the actual film. He would be turning in his grave if he thoguht the gun barrel should open at the begining.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Has anyone seen the film yet, Can anybody confirm it? Otherwise I call BS.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    Let's see how this plays out first, then I'll make up my mind. I do feel a little let down though, without a doubt.
  • jamesdutjamesdut
    Posts: 95
    Yer the film sounds brill will enjoy once the GB start thing has settled for me, at least it is there at some point
  • jamesdutjamesdut
    Posts: 95
    Yer the film sounds brill will enjoy once the GB start thing has settled for me, at least it is there at some point
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    Posts: 12,837
    Murdock wrote:
    Has anyone seen the film yet, Can anybody confirm it? Otherwise I call BS.

    A few people have seen it and a bunch of people that have been asked on Twitter all said it was at the end.

    When it was just the one guy I called BS but then I started reading more about it and sadly I think it's true.
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    Posts: 655
    Its been getting 5 stars, so thats great and still exciting. Oh well.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Ugh! I think I might stay off until I see the film so my curiosity can be satisfied.

    Murdock out!
  • Gareth00789Gareth00789
    edited October 2012 Posts: 655
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    Has anyone seen the film yet, Can anybody confirm it? Otherwise I call BS.

    A few people have seen it and a bunch of people that have been asked on Twitter all said it was at the end. When it was just the one guy I called BS but then I started reading more about it and sadly I think it's true.



    Its either true, or all reviews have been told to lie . lol

Sign In or Register to comment.