No Time to Die production thread

11271281301321331208

Comments

  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    There's a Cuban setpiece that has been partially filmed. The Norway scenes that we've seen seem like smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle.

    I'm curious to know what kind of stunt caused Craig's injury in Jamaica.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    jake24 wrote: »
    There's a Cuban setpiece that has been partially filmed. The Norway scenes that we've seen seem like smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle.

    I'm curious to know what kind of stunt caused Craig's injury in Jamaica.

    Wasn t he just running?
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    jake24 wrote: »
    There's a Cuban setpiece that has been partially filmed. The Norway scenes that we've seen seem like smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle.

    I'm curious to know what kind of stunt caused Craig's injury in Jamaica.

    Wasn t he just running?
    That's what the tabloids stated, but who knows? David Dencik also claimed to have filmed some action in Jamaica (or was supposed to).
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    jake24 wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    There's a Cuban setpiece that has been partially filmed. The Norway scenes that we've seen seem like smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle.

    I'm curious to know what kind of stunt caused Craig's injury in Jamaica.

    Wasn t he just running?
    That's what the tabloids stated, but who knows?

    Fair point. They are known to be chronic liars.
  • Posts: 17,819
    jake24 wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    There's a Cuban setpiece that has been partially filmed. The Norway scenes that we've seen seem like smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle.

    I'm curious to know what kind of stunt caused Craig's injury in Jamaica.

    Wasn t he just running?
    That's what the tabloids stated, but who knows? David Dencik also claimed to have filmed some action in Jamaica (or was supposed to).

    Here's the quote from Dencik himself (before going to Jamaica):
    - I don’t really know what I’m supposed to do, but I think it’s an action scene, he says and continues:
    - They don’t tell me much. It’s like working for MI6 for real, everything is secret.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Could he have been involved with the boat explosion sequence?
  • edited July 2019 Posts: 17,819
    jake24 wrote: »
    Could he have been involved with the boat explosion sequence?

    I can't remember when that sequence was filmed, but the original article where the quote is from was published April 25. He was supposed to fly to Jamaica the following week:
    Something that is clear is that Dencik goes to Jamaica next week to start recording. It will be a total of ten weeks.

    https://www.hd.se/2019-04-25/david-dencik-dyker-upp-i-namnlos-bond-film

    I don't know if that last bit refers to his Jamaica sequence involvement, or his total involvement in Bond 25.

    Can't wait to see him on screen. He is a fantastic actor.
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,545
    Red_Snow wrote: »


    Diesel bowsers heading to the set in Scotland.

    Just heard back from them. The fuel bowsers need to be on set by tomorrow.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Wonder what they're being used for.
  • Bentley007Bentley007 Manitoba, Canada
    Posts: 581
    jake24 wrote: »
    Wonder what they're being used for.

    I find it curious that the official 007 social media posted about the use of water for the Venice sequence on Casino Royale today. Perhaps the water will be used for a flood sqeuence or to ensure a rainy day.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    jake24 wrote: »
    Wonder what they're being used for.

    Rain.
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,545
    Bentley007 wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Wonder what they're being used for.

    I find it curious that the official 007 social media posted about the use of water for the Venice sequence on Casino Royale today. Perhaps the water will be used for a flood sqeuence or to ensure a rainy day.

    Are water tanks and fuel bowsers normally used on a film set?
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited July 2019 Posts: 5,970
    Wasn't it raining when we saw they were doing location scouting in Scotland as well?

    I still think Scotland could be doubling for Norway. Norway is also known for its cold and rainy weather.
  • edited July 2019 Posts: 1,680
    Craig told Charles they’re only a third of the way through shooting

    Are they filming today?
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited July 2019 Posts: 8,252
    RC7 wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Wonder what they're being used for.

    Rain.

    I worked on the set of Terminator: Genisys, specifically the Golden Gate Bridge sequence. The practical shots were done on a recreation of the bridge’s road built on the parking lot of an abandoned Shopping mall in New Orleans.
    While it was not raining in the sequence, the road was periodically wet down. I was told by a crew membe that it had to do with how road surfaces photograph .
    Wetting them down slightly helps with how they reflect light.
    Knowing this, it’s amazing how many streets , in scenes where it’s not raining , in many films are moist.

    Here is a very good read about wet streets.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/parade.com/101364/marilynvossavant/wet-streets-in-movies-20/amp/
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    edited July 2019 Posts: 1,003
    jake24 wrote: »
    There's a Cuban setpiece that has been partially filmed. The Norway scenes that we've seen seem like smaller pieces to a bigger puzzle.

    I'm curious to know what kind of stunt caused Craig's injury in Jamaica.

    Wasn t he just running?

    Found it.


    Last week, a source told Page Six that the 51-year-old actor hurt his ankle while filming an action scene, adding the injury to the list of multiple snafus he’s had while playing the hunky hero.

    “This time, he slipped over on a dock and wiped out,” we were told.

  • Posts: 4,412
    Interesting credits on Wikipedia (I know, I know) that says the writing credits will be:

    Screenplay by Cary Joji Fukunaga and Scott Z Burns and Phoebe Waller-Bridge
    Story by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade


    Do we think that will be the way it goes? I can't see them escaping from giving John Hodge a credit - especially considering WGA's strict rules on original writers. Though P&W may have gone back to their original draft.

    God this script situation is immensely confusing.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Interesting credits on Wikipedia (I know, I know) that says the writing credits will be:

    Screenplay by Cary Joji Fukunaga and Scott Z Burns and Phoebe Waller-Bridge
    Story by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade


    Do we think that will be the way it goes? I can't see them escaping from giving John Hodge a credit - especially considering WGA's strict rules on original writers. Though P&W may have gone back to their original draft.

    God this script situation is immensely confusing.

    Russians hacking the election and a crooked politician? Yeah that’s definitely not the plot anymore lol.

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    It’s likely, very likely, this script went back to P&W, but the end result will be something they barely recognize, hence story by still goes to them, but the script was reworked under Fukunaga’s vision/strong input, action polish completed by Burns, dialogue/character work to the always charming and exciting PWB.

    Very much doubt Hodge’s DNA is in the new drafts/shooting script.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    edited July 2019 Posts: 2,541
    Red_Snow wrote: »

    Beautiful
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,970
    @peter Exactly, and the product of all those writers could be gold :D
  • PavloPavlo Ukraine
    Posts: 323
    Interesting credits on Wikipedia (I know, I know) that says the writing credits will be:

    Screenplay by Cary Joji Fukunaga and Scott Z Burns and Phoebe Waller-Bridge
    Story by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade


    Do we think that will be the way it goes? I can't see them escaping from giving John Hodge a credit - especially considering WGA's strict rules on original writers. Though P&W may have gone back to their original draft.

    God this script situation is immensely confusing.

    Barbara Broccoli said that Cary is one of the authors of the story with Purvis and Wade (worked with them from September to January (quite a lot)). And he is definitely screenwiter as he, Daniel and PWB are forming a commitee that is polishing script (and PWB even said he is not writing script, she only polishes it, works on characters).
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    Denbigh wrote: »
    @peter Exactly, and the product of all those writers could be gold :D

    Yes @Denbigh ! As I told some other forum members, I’m just excited to LISTEN to this film! Listen to the dialogue. Listen to the unraveling of the story. The three primary screenwriters (if that’s what we suspect they are), are at the top of their game.

  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,231
    peter wrote: »
    It’s likely, very likely, this script went back to P&W, but the end result will be something they barely recognize, hence story by still goes to them, but the script was reworked under Fukunaga’s vision/strong input, action polish completed by Burns, dialogue/character work to the always charming and exciting PWB.

    Very much doubt Hodge’s DNA is in the new drafts/shooting script.

    Yep. Pretty much this. I doubt anything from Hodge remains, unless they've brought over a hook they liked in his draft and made it work with their idea.
  • Posts: 4,412
    peter wrote: »
    It’s likely, very likely, this script went back to P&W, but the end result will be something they barely recognize, hence story by still goes to them, but the script was reworked under Fukunaga’s vision/strong input, action polish completed by Burns, dialogue/character work to the always charming and exciting PWB.

    Very much doubt Hodge’s DNA is in the new drafts/shooting script.

    Interesting....

    I can't see a scenario playing out where John Hodge doesn't get a 'story' credit.

    I'm unsure how a settlement agreement (pay out) would preclude Hodge from asking the WGA to arbitrate. Plus I remember reading that if there are more than 5 writers on a project it immediately goes to arbitration.

    Basically, John Hodge is getting a credit.
  • RC7RC7
    edited July 2019 Posts: 10,512
    talos7 wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Wonder what they're being used for.

    Rain.

    I worked on the set of Terminator: Genisys, specifically the Golden Gate Bridge sequence. The practical shots were done on a recreation of the bridge’s road built on the parking lot of an abandoned Shopping mall in New Orleans.
    While it was not raining in the sequence, the road was periodically wet down. I was told by a crew membe that it had to do with how road surfaces photograph .
    Wetting them down slightly helps with how they reflect light.
    Knowing this, it’s amazing how many streets , in scenes where it’s not raining , in many films are moist.

    Here is a very good read about wet streets.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/parade.com/101364/marilynvossavant/wet-streets-in-movies-20/amp/

    Yeah, this often done at night. Not sure where/what they’re shooting for B25, but my guess would be they’ll be simulating rainfall given the volume they’ve ordered.
    peter wrote: »
    It’s likely, very likely, this script went back to P&W, but the end result will be something they barely recognize, hence story by still goes to them, but the script was reworked under Fukunaga’s vision/strong input, action polish completed by Burns, dialogue/character work to the always charming and exciting PWB.

    Very much doubt Hodge’s DNA is in the new drafts/shooting script.

    Interesting....

    I can't see a scenario playing out where John Hodge doesn't get a 'story' credit.

    I'm unsure how a settlement agreement (pay out) would preclude Hodge from asking the WGA to arbitrate. Plus I remember reading that if there are more than 5 writers on a project it immediately goes to arbitration.

    Basically, John Hodge is getting a credit.

    I had assumed Hodge’s work was shelved.
  • Posts: 12,522
    I’m hoping P&W didn’t have a lot of influence in the story this time around and the bulk of the finished product is more directly from Fukunaga, Burns, and PWB. I would think there’s nothing or almost nothing from Hodge and Boyle anymore.
  • Posts: 17,819
    Off topic this, but what happened to the Nicolas Winding Refn spy film The Avenging Silence, which was to be written by Neal Purvis and Robert Wade? Is it still happening?
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    FoxRox wrote: »
    I’m hoping P&W didn’t have a lot of influence in the story this time around and the bulk of the finished product is more directly from Fukunaga, Burns, and PWB. I would think there’s nothing or almost nothing from Hodge and Boyle anymore.

    If there are any elements of Hodge in B25, they will have to compensate with credit (and residuals and all that Jazz); but if they went back to a story he had no involvement in, they wouldn’t owe him anything (they already paid him for his services and they own the script he wrote; if they decide to produce that script, or a variation of it in the future, he would of course get the appropriate credit).
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,231
    peter wrote: »
    It’s likely, very likely, this script went back to P&W, but the end result will be something they barely recognize, hence story by still goes to them, but the script was reworked under Fukunaga’s vision/strong input, action polish completed by Burns, dialogue/character work to the always charming and exciting PWB.

    Very much doubt Hodge’s DNA is in the new drafts/shooting script.

    Interesting....

    I can't see a scenario playing out where John Hodge doesn't get a 'story' credit.

    I'm unsure how a settlement agreement (pay out) would preclude Hodge from asking the WGA to arbitrate. Plus I remember reading that if there are more than 5 writers on a project it immediately goes to arbitration.

    Basically, John Hodge is getting a credit.

    A payout wouldn't preclude any arbitration, considering Hodge did the work he was hired to do even though it was ultimately (seemingly) thrown out. If I'm not mistaken, and perhaps @peter could add to this - under WGA rules, this would be considered two separate projects unless they use some of Hodge's material, narrative or thematic, from his completed draft. Which of course we don't know for sure has happened but like most others here, I don't think they have. So the case for Hodge wouldn't go very far. Unless, as I said above, they have used some sort of hook from Hodge's script and brought it into the new version of the story. However, considering the vastly different rumours surrounding the plot and settings of Boyle's potential film and the one we're actually getting, I'd be very surprised if Hodge asked for arbitration.

    It's interesting though. For comparison, I'd take Peter Morgan's unused Skyfall script, which also had the idea of M dying. He didn't get a story credit. Was this perhaps because his outline was incomplete before the production froze and he left?
Sign In or Register to comment.