It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Interesting that Ana has only one project to shoot next. It's about M. Monroe and I doubt that she has to be bold for it. Her only project in the process of making is B25 and maybe she did this with her hair for Bond.[/quote]
In honor of her new iconic role, I hereby vote the Bond film be called......
THE MOUTH OF MARILYN MONROE
Are you insane?!? Of course it should be with the exact same attire!! ;)
Then again, we'll probably get a dozen of gratuitous shots of Bond walking around shirtless, and all the Bond gir....Women will probably be dressed from toe to chin. As usual.
Yes please :D
How time flies
It's possible. That would be a great surprise.
How long did they take to film SPECTRE?? Now with BOND 25 they're almost three months filming.
;)
Is this film even ready for production? I know IMDB is not the end all and be all, but there is no cast listed. And if they're shooting, we'd know more than this.
Plus, it's unlikely would Ana be wearing a wig for this part. They'd color and restyle her hair.
So...
What we are seeing is likely for a publicity shot and NOT for filming.
A bigger boat, rather.
;))
Sinead O'Connor?
So we’re back to a clone. 😏
In her younger yes, O’Connor was very attractive, with delicate features; she definitely wore bald well.
Yes, definitely not now ;)
Top Gun: Maverick is set for June 2020, and it already has a trailer out. Before they find the next to play Bond for Bond 26, MI:7 and MI:8 will have been made. [/quote]
Eon can’t seem to grasp this
Eon don't care what other studios are doing, nor should they.
That would be fantastic. Then, we could see Craig in two more. It would be a damn wise move seeing they constantly seem to be plagued by delays.
Agreed 100%. I'm sick of Bond having personal issues, family angst, unnecessary family backstories involving Blofeld - basically rewriting anything Fleming did, and discarding precious material that still hasn't been used.
Plagued By Delay.
A good title methinks. Because the villain will be called Dr. Delay, you see. ;))
Yeah, Licence To Kill, Goldeneye and OHMSS should have never been made.
Personal stuff, family business.
The only thing I agree with you two on is that Blofeld angle. What on earth where they thinking?
May be they had Martini too too much
I don’t love the adopted brother angle but I don’t fault them for trying something different.
What´s obvious is that many of These personal Things just take up time and space in the movie, but have no real meaning for the Story. Again, I´m sure better execution could make it work better. LTK as well as OHMSS are among my favorite Bond films.
CR was a massive success. If they would have built on that more they wouldn´t be doing DN all the time either, and they would have had massive opportunities for character development without taking too big risks.