It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Now that is James bond :))
Ian Fleming's James Bond all the way, folks. Only the comma of hair is missing. ;-)
Apparently the bottom photo is from filming today.....same costumes as the photoshoot.
Bottom photo is the photo call.
Same here. I can't see this happening. So far 'us' fan-sites have been wrong on a few (or more) occasions too. I remember back in January/February 2018 that Archivo007.com proudly announced that they were sure Christopher Nolan would do Bond 25. Or just recently, when JamesBondBrasil announced when the Bond 25-title was "The Genome Of A Whoman".
If there's a tiny truth in it, then it could mean Bond 26 isn't perhaps Bond 26, but Nomi 1, the first Bond-related spin-off (I don't think Bond will be driving the Valhalla, it will be Nomi's car). But again…...speculation in its purest form. Nah, Bond 25 is the end of the Craig-era. Period.
That we have a source that insists in crazy ideas explaining lots of strange things during Bond25 shooting, relating that with Bond26, that may be closer than we think.
Again: we were reluctant to publish or even share via pm those infos, but today that clapperboard looks like something we could share and start a "shadow of a doubt"? about what's happening or what will be happening in the next months...
I'd be okay with that. Because of all the gaps during Craig's tenure it does feel somewhat like he's been robbed of a sixth film or even the potential to beat Sir Roger's record (if he even wanted to do more than that). One can dream!
And Marketto published this:
As the man himself said, "trust at your own will"... ;)
My guess is it feels like there is enough for two movies but is all shot as one
Just stupid Italian tabloids making stuff up.
Nomi drives the new Aston and she’s obviously not in Italy!
I wouldn’t be surprised if she has a heroic death scene, she’s definitely not going to be the final girl. That’s going to be Swann.
Why would they bring her in at SP and have Bond quit his job for her? Even the whole “I love you”, plus a wedding scene?
They are not going to end the film like OHMSS, it’s been done before and that would be BAD writing.
Knowing Carey, he is extremely smart with story building + characters. I’d say Bond and Swann end up separated. It looks like she’s even in the bridge jump part with Bond. Maybe they fall into water and they go in separate directions?
Bond assumes she’s dead. He’s in Jamaica and Felix has photos of her being forced to help Malek!
Here’s how I would have the movie go down. Not saying this is true, just how I would do it based on what we know.
1) Norway PTS (Young Swann) Dream sequence.. Madeleine wakes up in hotel with Bond sweating and upset. Bond comforts her. Says he’s going to get a drink, bam they get attacked.
2) Chase scene, They jump the bridge, fall into water and are separated...
3) MAIN TITLES
4) MI6 scene/CIA or a random villain scene to introduce characters.
5) Madeleine alive, in an office years later. Malek breaks in kills everyone and kidnaps her.
6) Felix finds Bond, shows him photos of Madeleine alive...
7) Nomi meets Bond, says to stay out of her away, he’s no longer an agent.
8) Bond goes to Cuba, Meets Ana (girlfriend of Malek or Cuban intelligence), he’s tracking Malek or one of his henchman. Nomi gets pinned down and Bond saves her life.
The rest I have no idea what could possibly happen.
I don’t think Bond ever gets his 007 status back in the film. The fact that Monepenny and Bond are seen going to Q’s apartment means he’s no longer MI6. If he was MI6 why would they go to his home and not his lab at work?
100% he’s getting some gadgets in this film!
Sorry @ggl007, @marketto007, I don't like this kind 'news gathering'. It's there only for publicity reasons, for click bait, to wet our fan's, all too impatient, apetites and to say, if it becomes reality, "look, we are a trusted source". By doing so you simply are not. In the age of fake news I also find it irresponsible journalism. You leave the conclusion too much open for debate, and in a way that is scarily fitting for today's society were 'we' readers prefer to make our own truths.
I've learned with journalism to translate well-trusted sources into a coherent, filtered message and/or conclusion that then readers accept or disapprove. By being so quick in using such 'sources', without filtering them, without placing them into a larger context, without actually researching the credibility of the source, you create 'news' that IMO simply isn't news. A message like "trust at your own will" is a bit too easy. Same with using question marks. Good journalists IMO try to lower question marks to a minimum, because they are the 'trusted filterers'.
It's also one of the reasons why jamesbond.nl prefers not to post such stories or at least clearly tagging them with "Rumour" or even "Gossip". And even IF you prefer to post about it, then try to come up with other options, come up with ideas why there could be a Valhalla (not for Bond, perhaps for Nomi?).
But in the case of jamesbond.nl I can say that the decision will be made not to post anything about it. To hell with extra click bait then :-). Well, that is my opinion.
@ggl007 Why are you so determined to embarass yourself? Your sources have constanlty been wrong. This rumour that the ending will directly set up Bond 26 is simply ridiculous and completely false.
That's interesting coming from you.
No reason to be that harsh @PanchitoPistoles. I come to know @ggl007 and @marketto007 is passionate fans that have been real ambassadors for the franchise. However, I simply disagree with them how they publish news…..or 'news'.
I think the general direction here is correct. I am not sure Bond thinks Madeleine is dead. The bigger heartbreak is knowing they had to part ways for her own good. I am still thinking that the girl in Norway is Madeleine's daughter from her marriage, years in the past. If one of this film's themes is about facing our past (as Bond may with Vesper's grave) then Madeleine may be forced to do so, as well.
If the flashback of Madeleine as a child is the opening of the film..and we are in Madeleine's head....then by default, she becomes the main character. She is immediately the one with whom the audience is asked to identify. I simply can't see that happening.
She’s far too young to have a 12-13 year old daughter.. Especially if it was years ago. Spectre was set in 2015. Obviously they will do a 2015 and then the film takes place in 2020. So I’m assuming there’s a “5 year later” part to the film.
It’s already been confirmed it’s a young Swann. I don’t know why people continue to deny it.
She has a stunt double who openly says she’s young swanns stunt double... Also a girl from France was cast as young Swann.
Craig seems to be referring to drifting by using his hand brake.
He really pulls of that outfit (without the tie, that is).
And that black Jag gets it good in the end of that second one :)
According to a segment on Good Morning Norway covering the NTTD shoot in Norway in March, it was reported that the girl is Norwegian. The source was a Bond enthusiast and writer who had spoken to a security guard on location who hadn't signed any confidentiality papers.
I just know the casting call sheet said they wanted a French girl. She could be from that area though.
It would’ve been more expensive to cast a girl from France and fly her out. The girl looks EXACTLY like lea. So well done on their part for cashing someone who looks just like her.
It's not a confirmation of course, but it would make sense from a production point of view to get someone more local instead of going through the trouble of flying someone out to the location. Could be that she speaks French too.
Could be that she doesn't need to talk ;)
Yep, it might be a non-speaking part too!
Yes, screaming sounds the same in every language ;)