It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'd guess they're taken at such a distance that he's tried to up the resolution of the, presumably very grainy originals, by running this effect over them. But it's just ended up as looking bizarre! :)
Been trying to get a better street view of the surroundings bit it's difficult. It seems though we're in the right area or nearby at least.
Looking at Lea, she has the same brown shirt and her blond hair up in a semi-ponytail. Just compared it with the ones we saw on the beach
Yeah, I'm with you.
Think you're right.
Yes, that's a likely reason for applying the effect. Looks bizarre for sure!
If the images are cropped, maybe the person who provided the image has the originals?
Also, the beach photos was were she had the longer hair, right?
Fingers crossed for more images and/or originals! They might reveal more.
It does. Plus Lashana next to her. But the guy, not a clue. I also pointed out last week that there was a crew guy with 'diving service' printed on his back. This is why. Either Lea/Lashana are diving, swimming or prod just have divers next to the boat for safety or the camera crew filming in the water for that matter.
With that, now we can discuss why they are in a rib boat, landing on the beach, Lea talking in WT, why Lashana is dressed that way.
I think the blurred look of the waves and the branches of the trees in the foreground suggest application of an effect (you do have the opportunity to do so in Photoshop). But this is insignificant; it was just something that caught my eye.
Could the guy be Craig? Was he even on location when those images from last week were taken? I didn't follow much of the news last week.
Looking at those photos, I'm reminded of DN and Crab Key. They might be heading for a location they need to use a boat, or don't want to approach by land (car, on foot etc).
Don't think Craig was on location. Only Lashana, Lea, Cary in pics last week.
This is more of a Bond 26 rumour:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ColliderVideo/status/1179500135576825856
This syncs up with the rumours we have heard in the past. It looks as though this rumour is re-emerging. So perhaps some weight to it........could @PanchitoPistoles get his wish.........
Yeah, and they stigmatize/brand certain forummembers in here as 'Bond-haters' for bringing that up. Back in here we had a much more interesting, detailed discussion about that matter: https://www.mi6community.com/discussion/19229/if-eon-do-sell-the-franchise-then-who-should-take-over#latest (and also in here: https://www.mi6community.com/discussion/18761/no-time-to-die-at-the-box-office-in-2020#latest ). To be very honest, I think it's more realistic that MGM and their 50% share of the Bond-brand will be bought by a big tech company like Apple or Amazon than that EON will sell their 50% share of the Bond-brand. However, I wouldn't be surprised if EON decides to do that (just like Kathleen Kennedy and George Lucas did with Lucasfilm Ltd. and the Star Wars-franchise). And there have been numerous signs that make it actually not that surprising. It's a fact that EON Productions as of late is investing more in productions of non-Bond films; time that would otherwise be invested in Bond film productions.
We're on a thread about a film that is currently being directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga, and we're posting news and commenting about the possibility of Christopher Nolan directing the non-EON-produced next instalment. And that's not alienating a thread? Ok then, I'll shut up, I always do, because I'm the one talking nonsense here. Always am.
Exactly, thank you! Can't for the life of me understand how can't you guys see how these B52-members work. They drop a bomb in a thread and soon its a bloody blitz with uncivil and heated arguments.
Let's talk about the pictures on the boat, shall we? Or the Faroe islands filming? Or something regarding the filming of NTTD - again, what this thread is all about.
Correct. It has, without fail, repeatedly descended into conflict whenever it has been brought about.
I don't buy it, regardless. Even if Eon are interested in pursuing non-Bond ventures these days, Bond is almost 100% assured capital for them to use to help get those projects made. Selling would be counter-intuitive to their goals in the long term.
Oh well, good riddance NTTD, not even born but already forgotten.
So, the boat thing. An assault on a nordic villain lair? An escape? What do you guys think?
Oh, and I'm sorry to bring up filming related stuff, but, ya know...
They need to market this one hard if they want a win or billion
Fascinating, nonetheless. They are doing great work maximising all of these locations so that they all fit together. I don't think there's been a Bond in recent memory that has utilised locations so flexibly.
I wonder if Bond has been captured at this point in the story, hence his absence. He's gone to sort things out with Malek's villain himself, and Lynch's character has decided that she's gonna make an entrance - with Madeleine tagging along in the name of love.
As for the boat pictures, I still wanna stress that we see no child on that boat. Well I can't anyway, which would seemingly put those child rumours to bed for now, right? I still think the child belonged to a crew member.