No Time to Die production thread

14344354374394401208

Comments

  • Posts: 16,223
    Here we go.................JB-Build_0009.jpg

    Now for the reboot............

    no-time-to-die-exclusive.jpg

  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Much cooler on Daniel.
  • Posts: 17,819
    Maybe they'll do a Modern Times homage?

    Modern-Times.jpg
  • Posts: 1,661
    As Bond is now wearing braces I guess we can officially rename the film:

    No Time For A Tie

    200.webp?cid=790b761196c0b29ecd66bc0f915738dc27339421ba5e1041&rid=200.webp








  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited October 2019 Posts: 5,970
    I think this will be a sequence akin to the For Your Eyes only finale...

    ...and if I'm right, that'd be frickin' awesome :)
  • Posts: 1,661
    They're probably Q issue braces with 5G connectivity, GPS tracking, and they hold up your trousers too!
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    Wonder if there will be more images in that issue of Empire. Need to get my hands on that.
  • HildebrandRarityHildebrandRarity Centre international d'assistance aux personnes déplacées, Paris, France
    Posts: 488
    Bounine wrote: »
    ...I thought it was strange how Q said in Skyfall “we don’t do that anymore”. Spies have gadgets in real life.
    Well of course that was a joke, plus further set up Q to be put in his place over time and after his pajamas comment. His learning curve. Full-out gadgets were a certainty.

    Skyfall has a gadget that belongs to the top five of useless and silly gadgets ever in a Bond film (including the throwaway stuff we can see in the background of films like TSWLM), the PPK with the palm-print reader.
    Why would anybody use such a gun? You can't use it with gloves (something they forgot during production and caused them to CGI the hell out of Craig's hands during the Shanghai tower scene). When Craig finally uses it, you can see that it takes approximately one second for identification before the green LED gets lit. I don't know, but that may be a factor in a life or death situation where you have to use the gun. Now, imagine the gun barrel sequence with the customized PPK. Bond has to check the LEDs, waiting, waiting... waiting, checking the LEDs, here comes the beep, now I can aim and shoot.

    Of course, as soon as they mentioned this gun, I expected it to fall in the wrong hands, allowing Bond to escape from a very particular situation, and that's exactly what happens, paying tribute to the Roger Moore comedy from the seventies. Which is why I don't mind the scene. But it's still extremely silly.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,641
    Great news, hopefully we won't have to wait long too long till they start the real promotion.

    Love both pics especially, the first still from the film. It looks like a action shot, reminds of the first still from Skyfall in that it's got me really excited for the movie.

    As for the style, Craig it reminds me of Connery in Dr No, (when he's wearing a battered white shirt) at the end of film when Bond has to go through the tunnel, rescuing Honey and the escape from Dr No's lair
  • AgentJamesBond007AgentJamesBond007 Vesper’s grave
    edited October 2019 Posts: 2,634
    delfloria wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Zekidk wrote: »
    I have no problem with the lack of publicity. My only worry is that Craig doesn't leave on a high note. Meaning that his tenure has been one long turn to the dark side, fighting inner demons and so forth, always looking for a way to retire.

    Back in the days almost every kid wanted to be Bond. Cool gadgets, lots of women, glamorous - the world at his feet. Not much of that over the last 13 years. Guess it's the sign of the times that every hero has to have an inner struggle going on, so we are suppose to be feel sorry for the character instead.

    For Bond 26...can we please have James Bond back?

    Lots of women? check
    Glamorous? check, unless a casino & a beautiful gigantic eye don't count
    Cool gadgets? more or less check

    The only thing I agree on is that they should have never made Blofeld his "foster brother".

    Foster Bros. the single worst idea in the entire series! The one thing that will bog down NTTD.

    I wished the Blofeld and Bond had no relationship pre-Spectre and Blofeld’s only issue with Bond is that he derailed several of Spectre’s operations.
  • EndCredit007EndCredit007 EGYPT
    Posts: 114
    73106567_2611212098970688_280367394839330816_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_oc=AQnamBMIciNYLJeL6Z9ce3mpnTVszbkM_gUxLugIX-vG-hbJAwFlaCElUSKBWj--4dQ&_nc_ht=scontent-hbe1-1.xx&oh=1e555b8b938de68711042e2ac3ad21c2&oe=5E25B96D
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    edited October 2019 Posts: 3,497
    delfloria wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Zekidk wrote: »
    I have no problem with the lack of publicity. My only worry is that Craig doesn't leave on a high note. Meaning that his tenure has been one long turn to the dark side, fighting inner demons and so forth, always looking for a way to retire.

    Back in the days almost every kid wanted to be Bond. Cool gadgets, lots of women, glamorous - the world at his feet. Not much of that over the last 13 years. Guess it's the sign of the times that every hero has to have an inner struggle going on, so we are suppose to be feel sorry for the character instead.

    For Bond 26...can we please have James Bond back?

    Lots of women? check
    Glamorous? check, unless a casino & a beautiful gigantic eye don't count
    Cool gadgets? more or less check

    The only thing I agree on is that they should have never made Blofeld his "foster brother".

    Foster Bros. the single worst idea in the entire series! The one thing that will bog down NTTD.

    I wished the Blofeld and Bond had no relationship pre-Spectre and Blofeld’s only issue with Bond is that he derailed several of Spectre’s operations.

    He did but indeed, it was a bad idea.

    But, I hope that one of the many twists that are apparently happening will be that Blofeld lied about it.
  • edited October 2019 Posts: 5,767
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I think this will be a sequence akin to the For Your Eyes only finale...

    ...and if I'm right, that'd be frickin' awesome :)
    What has the parrot to do with suspenders?



    Bounine wrote: »
    ...I thought it was strange how Q said in Skyfall “we don’t do that anymore”. Spies have gadgets in real life.
    Well of course that was a joke, plus further set up Q to be put in his place over time and after his pajamas comment. His learning curve. Full-out gadgets were a certainty.

    Skyfall has a gadget that belongs to the top five of useless and silly gadgets ever in a Bond film (including the throwaway stuff we can see in the background of films like TSWLM), the PPK with the palm-print reader.
    Why would anybody use such a gun? You can't use it with gloves (something they forgot during production and caused them to CGI the hell out of Craig's hands during the Shanghai tower scene). When Craig finally uses it, you can see that it takes approximately one second for identification before the green LED gets lit. I don't know, but that may be a factor in a life or death situation where you have to use the gun. Now, imagine the gun barrel sequence with the customized PPK. Bond has to check the LEDs, waiting, waiting... waiting, checking the LEDs, here comes the beep, now I can aim and shoot.

    Of course, as soon as they mentioned this gun, I expected it to fall in the wrong hands, allowing Bond to escape from a very particular situation, and that's exactly what happens, paying tribute to the Roger Moore comedy from the seventies. Which is why I don't mind the scene. But it's still extremely silly.
    @HildebrandRarity, you´re right, I never thought of the issue with the time. I always thought of LTK when Q mentions the identification thing, but in LTK it´s a sniper rifle, so it´s no issue if the palm print reader takes a few seconds.
    Hilarious idea with the palmprint ident PPK in the gb sequence! I can see Bond walking, drawing, then a drastic Sergio Leone zoom on the palmprint reader, beep, beep, beep, beeeep, then Bond shoots! :-))
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    edited October 2019 Posts: 3,497
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I think this will be a sequence akin to the For Your Eyes only finale...

    ...and if I'm right, that'd be frickin' awesome :)
    What has the parrot to do with suspenders?

    Nothing, but maybe Malek's character has a lizard that can talk? ("hence unlike the world has ever seen")
  • Posts: 6,710
    73106567_2611212098970688_280367394839330816_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_oc=AQnamBMIciNYLJeL6Z9ce3mpnTVszbkM_gUxLugIX-vG-hbJAwFlaCElUSKBWj--4dQ&_nc_ht=scontent-hbe1-1.xx&oh=1e555b8b938de68711042e2ac3ad21c2&oe=5E25B96D

    Who's the classy looking dude on the right? Looks like James Bond to me.

    PS: Sorry, had to do it. Still miss that stylish know it all, sharply dressed Bond, but still physically apt to throw a punch Bond. Although I'm a Craig fan as well.
  • Posts: 5,767
    :-)))

  • RyanRyan Canada
    Posts: 692
    Looks like Bond is going to start shoveling coal into one of the Titanic's boilers.
  • Posts: 12,526
    Mallory wrote: »
    Denbigh wrote: »
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    I sure hope David Walliams will get the chance to narrate/present a Bond special (or similar) on TV at some point. It could be hilarious!

    Maybe that is what he is doing there? It certainly popped into my mind when I saw this? :-?
    Maybe you're on to something there! :-?
    Didn’t Jonathan Ross do one for Skyfall or Spectre?

    He did one for Spectre, which hilariously enough contained no actual clips from the movie. Just trailer bits.

    He did do specials when he hosted the film review show for the BBC. However after the radio scandal he got caught up in, that was the end of that.

    And their we have it people! Another Bond movie in the can! So looking forward to seeing this next April! Congratulations and thank you to all involved for giving us another 007 movie!!!! \m/ <:-P :-bd
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    edited October 2019 Posts: 3,022
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Wonder if there will be more images in that issue of Empire. Need to get my hands on that.

    @DonnyDB5 Read here:

    https://www.empireonline.com/movies/news/no-time-to-die-exclusive-image-daniel-craig-james-bond/
  • Posts: 1,680
    Everyone wants all these homages and throwbacks to previous bond films in every new bond film.

    Let the film create original moments and sequences that we can look back on or become classic moments themselves.

    We already had a Dr No type sequence in Spectre. When Bond and Madeline arrive at Oberhausers base their given their own rooms, clothing , an escort with champagne, and a meteorite to marvel at, we don’t need to see it again in NTTD
  • Posts: 12,526
    Liking the first still image of DC in NTTD! :D :-bd Let's hope for more in the coming week or so?!!!!!! [-O<
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    New stills:

    Norway

    h1KlAtD.jpg
    c8KkkgW.jpg
    nXn7UYY.jpg

    Matera

    aXlMkWl.jpg
    8JYgkFS.jpg

    London

    kpS4mgD.jpg

    Pinewood

    t1K8RMZ.jpg
    kmdzRlR.jpg

  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited October 2019 Posts: 5,970
    Contraband wrote: »
    h1KlAtD.jpg
    c8KkkgW.jpg
    nXn7UYY.jpg
    aXlMkWl.jpg
    8JYgkFS.jpg
    kpS4mgD.jpg

    Bloody beautiful :)
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Where are those from?
  • Posts: 17,819
    Contraband wrote: »
    New stills:

    Norway

    h1KlAtD.jpg
    c8KkkgW.jpg
    nXn7UYY.jpg

    I think this might be at Lutvann, where they shot the underwater parts for the forest/cabin sequence?
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    jake24 wrote: »
    Where are those from?

    Found them on instagram
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    Contraband wrote: »
    New stills:

    Norway

    h1KlAtD.jpg
    c8KkkgW.jpg
    nXn7UYY.jpg

    I think this might be at Lutvann, where they shot the underwater parts for the forest/cabin sequence?

    Yes it is
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    jake24 wrote: »
    Where are those from?

    instagram.com/stevenbarham_photography/
  • Posts: 17,819
    Contraband wrote: »
    Contraband wrote: »
    New stills:

    Norway

    h1KlAtD.jpg
    c8KkkgW.jpg
    nXn7UYY.jpg

    I think this might be at Lutvann, where they shot the underwater parts for the forest/cabin sequence?

    Yes it is

    Nice! Haven't seen too many photos from that location. There's been more photos from Langvann in Nittedal.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,970
    Contraband wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Where are those from?

    instagram.com/stevenbarham_photography/
    He's listed as the visual effects data wrangler on the film :)
Sign In or Register to comment.