No Time to Die production thread

talos7

Ana is stunning; I hope Lashana gives a strong performance.

00Agent

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all.

It sounds like Lashana want's to stroke her ego a bit with how unique and "different" her character is, but she should not forget in what movie franchise she's appearing in. Bond is about glamour, not ultra realism like that.

I don't wanna see Bond take a s*** either. No matter how realistic.

007Blofeld

00Agent wrote: »

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all.

It sounds like Lashana want's to stroke her ego a bit with how unique and "different" her character is, but she should not forget in what movie franchise she's appearing in. Bond is about glamour, not ultra realism like that.

I don't wanna see Bond take a s*** either. No matter how realistic.

@00Agent I meant the thing about the bathroom stuff I don't want Bond to be crap either. That to I don't really care for the ego.

TripAces

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all the whole you know what thing the t word.

She was not being serious. It was likely one of those, "Hey, what if...?" conversations in which your brainstorming takes you in all sorts of crazy directions.

Relax. There will be no tampon dropping.

Contraband

Trailer soon?

Folks on my twitter have a theory. Official 007 dropped the unusual mini-edit ft. Spectre footage on the 2nd. Today they dropped Skyfall, five days after. That could mean QoS on Monday 11th, and CR on Saturday 16th which leads up to a trailer five days later, Thursday 21th

https://twitter.com/007/status/1190674932448915458

https://twitter.com/007/status/1192124487023677440

DCisared

00Agent wrote: »

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all.

It sounds like Lashana want's to stroke her ego a bit with how unique and "different" her character is, but she should not forget in what movie franchise she's appearing in. Bond is about glamour, not ultra realism like that.

I don't wanna see Bond take a s*** either. No matter how realistic.

You do realise that almost all women have periods don’t you? There’s nothing disgusting about something that is completely natural.

00Agent

DCisared wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all.

It sounds like Lashana want's to stroke her ego a bit with how unique and "different" her character is, but she should not forget in what movie franchise she's appearing in. Bond is about glamour, not ultra realism like that.

I don't wanna see Bond take a s*** either. No matter how realistic.

You do realise that almost all women have periods don’t you? There’s nothing disgusting about something that is completely natural.

Lol.
Nice try.

Anyway, i got full confidence in Barbara and Michael to keep such things in check.
Move on.

007Blofeld

DCisared wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all.

It sounds like Lashana want's to stroke her ego a bit with how unique and "different" her character is, but she should not forget in what movie franchise she's appearing in. Bond is about glamour, not ultra realism like that.

I don't wanna see Bond take a s*** either. No matter how realistic.

You do realise that almost all women have periods don’t you? There’s nothing disgusting about something that is completely natural.

@DCisared but we don't need it in a Bond film like men's sexual stuff it's just unnecessary it would definitely be a big turn off in the film.

Connor

The No Time to Die girls are rocking the magazine covers this month. Waller-Bridge is the feature of none other than Vogue for December's issue!

https://twitter.com/voguemagazine/status/1192079270941732865

Contraband

Connor wrote: »

The No Time to Die girls are rocking the magazine covers this month. Waller-Bridge is the feature of none other than Vogue for December's issue!

https://twitter.com/voguemagazine/status/1192079270941732865

Dead link..

https://twitter.com/voguemagazine/status/1192079270941732865

2Wint2Kidd

Contraband wrote: »

Trailer soon?

Folks on my twitter have a theory. Official 007 dropped the unusual mini-edit ft. Spectre footage on the 2nd. Today they dropped Skyfall, five days after. That could mean QoS on Monday 11th, and CR on Saturday 16th which leads up to a trailer five days later, Thursday 21th

https://twitter.com/007/status/1190674932448915458

https://twitter.com/007/status/1192124487023677440

I think it would have made more sense to release them the other way round, CR through to SP. I don't think we'll get a trailer until early December or maybe at the end of November if we're lucky. To be honest I can wait. Less is more, and it's kind of nice not knowing what to expect so close to the release date.

007Blofeld

2Wint2Kidd wrote: »

Contraband wrote: »

Trailer soon?

Folks on my twitter have a theory. Official 007 dropped the unusual mini-edit ft. Spectre footage on the 2nd. Today they dropped Skyfall, five days after. That could mean QoS on Monday 11th, and CR on Saturday 16th which leads up to a trailer five days later, Thursday 21th

https://twitter.com/007/status/1190674932448915458

https://twitter.com/007/status/1192124487023677440

I think it would have made more sense to release them the other way round, CR through to SP. I don't think we'll get a trailer until early December or maybe at the end of November if we're lucky. To be honest I can wait. Less is more, and it's kind of nice not knowing what to expect so close to the release date.

+1

Contraband

2Wint2Kidd wrote: »

Contraband wrote: »

Trailer soon?

Folks on my twitter have a theory. Official 007 dropped the unusual mini-edit ft. Spectre footage on the 2nd. Today they dropped Skyfall, five days after. That could mean QoS on Monday 11th, and CR on Saturday 16th which leads up to a trailer five days later, Thursday 21th

https://twitter.com/007/status/1190674932448915458

https://twitter.com/007/status/1192124487023677440

I think it would have made more sense to release them the other way round, CR through to SP. I don't think we'll get a trailer until early December or maybe at the end of November if we're lucky. To be honest I can wait. Less is more, and it's kind of nice not knowing what to expect so close to the release date.

Yeah, that order is weird. That's for sure.

matt_u

WTF.

Shaping a real woman in a Bond film - whatever that means - doesn't mean that they need to show a woman throwing her bloody tampon down the toilet. WTF, hopefully they never even filmed that bit of a scene. Those are the things that literally takes me out of a film. Unnecessary forced.

007Blofeld

matt_u wrote: »

WTF.

Shaping a real woman in a Bond film - whatever that means - doesn't mean that they need to show a woman throwing her bloody tampon down the toilet. WTF, hopefully they never even filmed that bit of a scene. Those are the things that literally takes me out of a film. Unnecessary forced.

@matt_u amen +1

007Blofeld

TripAces wrote: »

007Blofeld wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

Pierce2Daniel wrote: »

00Agent wrote: »

FrankXavier wrote: »

"[Paloma] is a character that is very irresponsible," says de Armas. "She's got this bubbliness of someone who is excited to be on a mission, but she plays with this ambiguity — you don't really know if she's like a really trained, prepared partner for Bond." Sure, de Armas is running around in a gorgeous gown with sky-high heels ("No one can train you or prepare you for that," she says), but she adds that "brains and looks are equal this time. She's very smart. She helps Bond navigate through certain things that he wouldn't be able to do alone."

Thanks for reminding us Ana, i was beginning to wonder about that...

Interesting……

I’m at a total loss as to who the Paloma character is. She isn’t a femme fatale by the sounds of it. Neither is she the villain’s girl who Bond liberates. So………what is she?

It sounds as if Paloma is going to be a ‘bubbly girl who gets drawn into the mission.’ Sounds a bit lame. She could be a society girl who gets roped into the mission somehow? Sorta like a Kim Kardashian figure.

Also, the tampon thing sounds bad. It sounds like something in Fleabag - in the worst possible sense.

More photos:

Agreed, i hope it doesn't make the cut.

Paloma sounds like an agent. What else would she do in Cuba of all places?
And she has been saying she's going to kill/fight bad guys so she has training.

Just a guess though.
But i like the idea of her having sky high heels. Maybe they are not going for ultra realism with every character here, which i would welcome.

Finally sounds we all agree on! I would be disgusted to see that in a Bond film it isn't necessarily at all the whole you know what thing the t word.

She was not being serious. It was likely one of those, "Hey, what if...?" conversations in which your brainstorming takes you in all sorts of crazy directions.

Relax. There will be no tampon dropping.

@TripAces I so hope

Red_Snow

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Resurrection

Relax guys I think she was just joking. Besides I have full faith in Barbara, she won't allow such a thing in a bond film.

007Blofeld

Resurrection wrote: »

Relax guys I think she was just joking. Besides I have full faith in Barbara, she won't allow such a thing in a bond film.

I hope not at this rate I can't tell what is joking or not.

delfloria

This!

Red_Snow wrote: »

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Minion

I'm not necessarily against the inclusion of such a scene, but generally Bond needs to consider what type of material to include on an international scale, not just a domestic one. It isn't like Netflix where safeguarding their content behind a paywall allows a modicum of protection towards censorship or bans.

JamesCraig

delfloria wrote: »

This!

Red_Snow wrote: »

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Is this confirmed or yet another pointless "whisper" that will take 15 pages to cool off?

Minion

JamesCraig wrote: »

delfloria wrote: »

This!

Red_Snow wrote: »

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Is this confirmed or yet another pointless "whisper" that will take 15 pages to cool off?

The latter.

Visitor1982

Are people really discussing tampons now?

I for one wouldn't bat an eyelash if we did see something like that. Times change and so should Bond.

JamesCraig

Minion wrote: »

JamesCraig wrote: »

delfloria wrote: »

This!

Red_Snow wrote: »

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Is this confirmed or yet another pointless "whisper" that will take 15 pages to cool off?

The latter.

:-q

Murdock

This thread needs an enema.

Walecs

Red_Snow wrote: »

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Agreed, it totally fits the humor of previous Austin Powers movies.

Honestly, this tampon thing would ruin the movie for me even worse than the Brofeld thing, but luckily it's the kind of stuff a fan-edit can rid of.

CraigMooreOHMSS

Walecs wrote: »

Red_Snow wrote: »

Throwing a used tampon in the bin, is a bit too much for a Bond film, but there's no reason she couldn't use one to a solve a problem during a mission. It's certainly something Bond is unlikely to think of using, could make for a humourous teamwork situation.

Agreed, it totally fits the humor of previous Austin Powers movies.

Honestly, this tampon thing would ruin the movie for me even worse than the Brofeld thing, but luckily it's the kind of stuff a fan-edit can rid of.

Even if it was done with this level of confidence?

RogueAgent

OMG!!!! Ana in those thigh high boots has wiped me out!!! :x :-t :))

delfloria

Speaking of Austin Powers, isn't that were the Blofeld and Bond are foster brothers concept come from? I'd love to have NTTD get rid of that fact somehow. (See how I brought this back to NTTD)