It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'm supposed to contradict myself that's what people want.
Tempus fugit. Having said that I've got 3 degrees and had 3 jobs during Craig's era. He's been Bond for quite some time.
Yeah, sure...flew very fast...even if it's been sometime.
I'm somewhere between you and @Shardlake on this one, I think.
The critiques I'm hearing about The Rhythm Section aren't about the actors, they're higher-order problems that producers would be involved with - tone, script, etc. This suggests that EON might have presided over (or ignored) some poor choices.
On the other hand, the marketing for this one was ultra-minimal, it still suffers from a "google problem" (half the news about it is variations on 'troubled production') and it was dropped into a January release. So maybe EON knew that this one didn't have legs and decided to cut their losses.
Anyway, will it impact NTTD?
I don't see that it will outwardly - Bond is a totally different machine. Behind the scenes, I hope it sharpens EON's focus . . .
Higher up problems hmm interesting we will have to see.
As someone who grew up with Brosnan as Bond, I was always fascinated with how long Sir Roger was Bond. Never did I think I'd get to live through a near 15 year tenure with a Bond actor. What a ride! I started and finished high school, started and finished post-secondary, and started a family. It's amazing to think of how much life has passed and yet I can still go enjoy one more Daniel Craig Bond adventure this April.
Yes, it is, I feel the same
8-X :-SS
Depending on how long the gap is and the age of the next actor, I'm estimating a decade is about right for me as well. That's unless of course, he hasn't been born yet. In that case, he's at least 35 years younger than all of us.
The runtime news is music to my ears. The thought of a three hour Bond film after a five year wait is perfect.
Also, the tragedy aside, Whakaari is stunning
Totally okay with NTTD being 3 hours, if they use it right. And i think they will.
If this rumour is true, i can see now why they hired so many scriptwriters for this, just to make it work.
If true, Crag will have done the 3 longest Bond films as well as the shortest.
30 minutes in matera
45 minutes in Jamaica.
30 minutes in Cuba.
30-40 minutes in London
One hour for Norway/Russia
James Bond is 007. Always has been, always will be.
I'm afraid it might seem like a pretentious artsy hold over from the Oscar bait Mendes era.
Then again CJF is s different director altogether with a different style. Maybe it will be a Bond fan's three hour delight?
I do feel NTTD is probably the last time we see a new Bond film on the screen for quite some time, so perhaps the more the merrier?
No he isn't its nomi @TripAces
I have no problem with a long running time, so long as it's warranted. There's still so much we don't know about NTTD. I'm very much looking forward too it.
Avoiding spoilers will be a challenge. I assume we will have two separate threads for spoiler and non-spoiler NTTD impressions when it first hits?
If she is, the number will go back to its rightful owner very quickly. It's not worth concern. Like I said: James Bond is 007.