› › ›

No Time to Die production thread

1…646647649651652…1208

Comments

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,601
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Paloma definitely could become one of the most popular minor Bond girls ever.

    Because she's hot? We don't really know anything about her. She could be one of the least popular! :D
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,215
    mtm wrote: »
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Paloma definitely could become one of the most popular minor Bond girls ever.

    Because she's hot?

    It's pretty obvious many fans, mainly males, were more excited over her casting than any of the other actresses.
  • ContrabandContraband Sweden
    Posts: 3,022
    Wrong thread, but just wanna say that Billie & Finneas took the nr 1 spot in both the UK and Ireland with the theme song today. The biggest opening week of all time for a James Bond song.
  • ggl007ggl007 www.archivo007.com Spain, España
    Posts: 2,541
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    Oh man! This is great news.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,215
    Glad that's cleared up.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    edited February 2020 Posts: 9,511
    mtm wrote: »
    Just because you gotta line 'em up...

    Craig-Posters.jpg

    Wow! I’d put this new NTTD poster second only to CR...
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,521
    Cool. Lots of content to enjoy and dissect! I figured for a while it would probably be on the longer side. Longest Bond ever! But still under 3 hours.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited February 2020 Posts: 8,231
    peter wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Just because you gotta line 'em up...

    Craig-Posters.jpg

    Wow! I’d put this new NTTD poster second only to CR...

    Me too. Much better than the other three.
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    So, @antovolk was correct in his predictions! =D>
  • MalloryMallory
    Posts: 2,171
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    Oh man! This is great news.

    Not a huge surprise. I think @antovolk can confirm but the max run time of an Imax 70mm print is 165 mins, so they would be editing towards that, and if it was nearing 3hours, cutting the less important stuff.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    Great news about the running time \m/
  • Mathis1Mathis1
    Posts: 7,537
    peter wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Just because you gotta line 'em up...

    Craig-Posters.jpg

    Wow! I’d put this new NTTD poster second only to CR...

    I always liked the QOS one, so I would put NTTD 2nd to that, then CR, then SP and last SF!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited February 2020 Posts: 16,601
    peter wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Just because you gotta line 'em up...

    Craig-Posters.jpg

    Wow! I’d put this new NTTD poster second only to CR...

    I might even put it top to be honest! I find CR's a bit fussy-looking, although I know it had a different job to do (tell people there's a new Bond).

    How did Skyfall's poster happen?! :D
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,521
    Personally I like all the posters, though CR + QOS + NTTD appeal to me more than SF + SP.
  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    Posts: 3,157
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    Oh man! This is great news.

    Indeed.
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,521
    Also worth nothing the poster still cites Craig as “Ian Fleming’s James Bond 007.”
  • GatecrasherGatecrasher Classified
    Posts: 265
    Man, the NTTD poster makes all the other posters of the Craig era pale in comparison. At least this newer poster looks dynamic, like there’s something going on?
  • ToTheRightToTheRight
    Posts: 16,223
    The new poster is my favorite of the Craig era.
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    peter wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Just because you gotta line 'em up...

    Craig-Posters.jpg

    Wow! I’d put this new NTTD poster second only to CR...

    I wasn't sure to start with but now It's really growing on me quite intense and I would agree second to CR.
  • battleshipgreygtbattleshipgreygt
    Posts: 1,220
    That’s probably my favourite of all the Craig era posters. Quite a departure from what we’ve gotten in the past. I found the posters for SF and SP to be generic and a bit at odds with the tone/feel of the films themselves. This one is less concerned with screaming “HEY ITS A NEW JAMES BOND MOVIE!!” than it is with being visceral, gritty, and emotional, which I imagine is indicative of the film itself.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    166 minutes. I posted that a couple days ago.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    166 minutes. I posted that a couple days ago.

    If I may, who/what is the official source?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    166 minutes. I posted that a couple days ago.

    If I may, who/what is the official source?

    Cinemas already have it up on their web pages.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,641
    Thanks for confirming the running time @ggl007 that's a lot to look forward to
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    edited February 2020 Posts: 17,819
    mtm wrote: »
    Just because you gotta line 'em up...

    Craig-Posters.jpg

    Interesting to see them all side by side. NTTD stands out because of the extreme close-up, though I can't help but be drawn to the colourful QOS one.

    I'd rank them:
    CR
    QOS
    NTTD
    SP
    SF
  • GetafixGetafix
    edited February 2020 Posts: 11,425
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    antovolk wrote: »
    ERUEdUEXYAE2_yd?format=jpg

    UK version the PRs just emailed. Looks like this is our theatrical poster.

    Very impressive! Has a film noir vibe, and I love the blue of the lettering!

    Yes I like this poster after the rather bland ones for SF and SP. As someone said it suggests a noirish, thrillerish vibe. I think it might be the best poster of the Craig era, but they haven't been particularly strong.

    I still wish EON put out a hand painted one with all the girls and cars in just for tradition's sake.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,641
    I love the vibe of this film, all the promotional material they've put out so far feels so fresh and new but it still feels like classic Bond. Credit to those involved
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    I will be more than happy with 165 minute run time!!! Oh yes!!!! <:-P \:D/ :-bd
  • JWPepperJWPepper You sit on it, but you can't take it with you.
    edited February 2020 Posts: 512
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Just to confirm.

    This came from an official source: RUNNING TIME: 165 MINS approx.

    166 minutes. I posted that a couple days ago.

    Dutch distributor has communicated a running time of 170 minutes to all cinemas in the Netherlands.

    It's probably a rounded number. So 166 seems true.
  • BurgessBurgess
    edited February 2020 Posts: 398
    So, are Bond and Coke back together?



Sign In or Register to comment.