It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Hahaha
Lmao
But, let's be real. It's not that great. But it's certainly a marked improvement to the bland posters for SF and (especially) SP. It's a little more edgy.....but I'm not totally infatuated with the design.
Also, note that Lea Seydoux gets a starring role in the poster. She also featured prominently in the poster for SP. Something of a Bond first....
I'd bet the car scene with its "Why would I betray you?" comes before the song.
So it is, another unique connection between two Bond films.
It looks like it'll feature in some capacity, but won't be as showy an appearance.
Comes from Esquire magazine UK. Only a parked Valhalla will be ft.
I don't think "replaced" is the word I'd use based on the phrasing there. It sounds like the Superleggra was always going to be used the way it was.
Good news though, I think. The Valhalla is an awful looking car.
I agree. I wasn’t keen on that car from the moment it was announced. The Superleggera is much better looking.
Yeah, Waterloo in this area.
http://strikefans.com/the-kings-arms/
I hope it was the action they cut back on but that’s wishful thinking when it comes to Bond. I won’t be surprised if they’ve trimmed back the character driven scenes which is a disappointment.
"Filmmaker Cary Joji Fukunaga captured select sequences of No Time To Die using IMAX’s extremely high-resolution 15/70mm film cameras to deliver IMAX audiences greater scope and breathtaking image quality. Only in IMAX theatres will audiences see the film the way it was creatively intended, as the scenes shot with IMAX film cameras will expand vertically to fill the IMAX screen, providing audiences up to 40% more of the image with unprecedented crispness, clarity and color for a truly immersive experience.
In addition to being shot with IMAX film cameras and the exclusive expanded aspect ratio, the IMAX release of No Time To Die will be digitally re-mastered into the image and sound quality of The IMAX Experience with proprietary IMAX DMR (Digital Re-mastering) technology. The crystal-clear images, coupled with IMAX’s customized theatre geometry and powerful digital audio, create a unique environment that will make audiences feel as if they are in the movie."
https://collider.com/no-time-to-die-imax-poster/
I pointed this out earlier. I feel pretty confident Nomi will be 007 in the movie based on the hints still. Maybe Bond will have the title at some point, or it’s just the traditional listing without regards to the plot.
Why didn’t they shoot the whole movie in IMAX?
Compared to the previous efforts of SP and SF. It still lacks that old time Bond poster feel. I oh so wish they'd give us something like these...
On a final note, would Ben Whishaw's billing perhaps suggest he has a larger role than before?
Though I'd like to see some old style posters, sure.
Indeed. I may have it backwards. Grave-Car chase with madeleine-train station. Titles. Matera motorcycle chase from train station, to jump from the bridge.
Of course, based on Occam's razor, it's all likely PTS. But I thought Craig said film goes "back to Matera," and that has always stuck with me, in terms of the PTS.
On a separate note, did others catch the credits in upper left corner? Daniel Craig is "James Bond 007."
Jeez, I hope this puts the "Nomi is 007" nonsense to bed, finally.
For somebody who is a big VR enthusiast, the statement "feel as if they are in the movie" is absurdly ridiculous. If you want immersiveness then make a 007 virtual reality adventure. Then you will know what it is to be "in the movie".
“ immersive “ is applicable , even if exaggerated to someone who has already discovered VR.
The cameras are too big and noisy and difficult to use for an entire film. 2/3 minutes per take and most notably it's difficult to shoot dialogue scenes with them without then having to redub in ADR. But Nolan is trying to come close, 75% of Dunkirk was in IMAX, even more is expected for Tenet.
He's definitely channeling some Steve McQueen there which DC will be chuffed about, being a big McQueen fan.
That you be very cool a vr Bond imagine the gunbarrel sequence.