No Time to Die production thread

17387397417437441208

Comments

  • Or is it because only allowing 1 person for every 4 seats in cinema venues would naturally reduce any potential box office takings from people who actually would be willing to take a trip to the cinema in the current climate?

    I realise that reducing seats would dramatically reduce box office takings, that's simple economics. At least they would get some money now and we would have had a chance to see it, rather than delaying the whole thing to November and hoping for the best (and then possibly delaying it again multiple times - you'll probably feel at that point how I feel now).

    The virus is of course a good enough reason. All I meant was for something like that to happen right at the last moment, felt like a bizarre dream, it didn't seem real - it just seems like cruel fate or incredibly bad luck that actually keeps this film from coming out. Hopefully for the next actor, it would be great if they could get back to a consistent schedule again - something like this wouldn't have otherwise felt to me like the straw that broke the camel's back. I want to keep my hopes up re. streaming (at least if they can't release it in cinemas in November - I'd rather see it at home at that point rather than wait even more if this virus is still around).

    I'm sorry for the comments I made. I had just hoped that more people on here would have agreed with or appreciated my views on this matter and you along with a few others have just belittled and insulted almost everything I've said on this forum about this. Joining this forum was a very bad idea (I've read discussions on this forum for several years but never joined until now because I wanted to talk about this with people who I thought would be like minded Bond fans who might understand my point of view more my close friends in real life). I'm going to look into deleting my account now.
  • AgentJamesBond007AgentJamesBond007 Vesper’s grave
    Posts: 2,634
    There was no chance the film would’ve been released in February regardless. Editing for the film wasn’t even completed until early March.

    Releasing the film in April would be top to bottom a horrendous move. The virus has caused most, if not all, cinemas in both the US and UK to shut down so even doing the separate seating wasn’t much of an option. Economically, it would’ve been clear that this simply isn’t feasible, as you see almost every film coming up being delayed. Releasing it onto a digital platform isn’t financially feasible either, as chances are this film gets leaked or the whatever revenue they get from home video release is only a percentage of what they could’ve achieved from a theatrical release.

    And not only financially, if NTTD didn’t get delayed when it did, they would’ve certainly delayed the release by now. If they had decided to proceed with the April release, it would’ve been harshly criticized by the media and general public because releasing a blockbuster of this caliber in a time like this is an outright idiotic move on EON/MGM/Universal’s part to the point where there would be questions of whether Bond could recover from this. If they pushed NTTD up, let’s say a month, it’s box office returns could be comparable to, say, Pixar’s Onward, which had a budget of over $175M. Because of the pandemic, it would end with only $104.5M in the box office. A big budget film made by a known studio (Disney/Pixar) with known actors (Chris Pratt/Tom Holland) received a measly $104.5M in the box office. That is very clearly an underperformance, but Disney will be able to survive whatever losses it attains. MGM, however, is pretty much desperately banking on NTTD’s success. They own half of the Bond rights along with EON so the future of this series is pretty dependent on this film not being a failure, which would’ve been the case if the film came out in April, if not earlier.

    They very clearly did not use MI6’s open letter in consideration of this, the Bond team could even be considered “ahead of the curve” here. Does it suck? Sure. But Bond’s a series that can deal with prolonged waits (see: Goldeneye). But at least there’s a light at the end of the tunnel and James Bond will most certainly return in NTTD.
  • Posts: 727
    You ask me: they should release it on streaming. I would even pay as high as 20 pounds to rent the film.
  • Posts: 1,870
    You ask me: they should release it on streaming. I would even pay as high as 20 pounds to rent the film.

    Then it becomes the James Bond TV movie/series.
  • Posts: 859
    The photos of the yesterday première :

    90905756_581510385795340_3638341640541700096_n.png?w=960

    31-octobre-4.jpg?w=1250




    31-octobre-10.png?resize=768%2C1211

    More here : http://www.commander007.net/2020/no-time-to-die-avant-premiere-mondiale-avec-annonce-dune-sortie-en-vod/

    So what do you think of the new Disney+ launch?
  • imranbecksimranbecks Singapore
    Posts: 984
    LOL! Wonderfully done!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,598
    I'm just curious as to how you would feel if what you wish for were true; you got to see the film, and it was worth the wait, but the price is that the film vastly under performs financially to the point where it will certainly be considered a box office failure? Would it matter to you?

    Would it matter to you? The financial gains of the people making a movie has never been a consideration to me as to whether I enjoy a film or not. It’s irrelevant. The only way it could affect me is whether it has an impact on making the next one, but these are Bond films: nothing will stop the next one getting made. Especially the truly exceptional circumstances around this one’s release.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited April 2020 Posts: 8,231
    mtm wrote: »
    I'm just curious as to how you would feel if what you wish for were true; you got to see the film, and it was worth the wait, but the price is that the film vastly under performs financially to the point where it will certainly be considered a box office failure? Would it matter to you?

    Would it matter to you? The financial gains of the people making a movie has never been a consideration to me as to whether I enjoy a film or not. It’s irrelevant. The only way it could affect me is whether it has an impact on making the next one, but these are Bond films: nothing will stop the next one getting made. Especially the truly exceptional circumstances around this one’s release.

    Seeing the film flop would be very disappointing to me, yes.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    @RogerJonMoorePertwee that wasn't an answer to the question that was put to you, I'm afraid - but please by all means continue with the character attacks; am I pessimistic because I don't believe hope is a good business plan? Or is it because only allowing 1 person for every 4 seats in cinema venues would naturally reduce any potential box office takings from people who actually would be willing to take a trip to the cinema in the current climate? Most of these statements are based in some sort of fact, so I'm not sure how it's pessimistic. It is good that you understand why EON did what they did, though; even if it seems like the deaths of thousands of people because of a "sodding virus" seems to not be a good enough reason for you.

    We've debated the streaming option ad nauseam in the last week or so. It's just not viable for a number of reasons.

    I'm not really sure I want to engage with you much longer about this. We're just going to keep going round in circles, as ultimately it boils down to emotion versus logic. Sorry if I offended you, and I kindly accept your apology in advance for the jibes you've thrown my way in return.

    Peace. :)>-

    Let it go.

    Luckily @Contraband still uses this thread for what it was orginally intended.
  • edited April 2020 Posts: 440
    A lot of people here seem to be shocked at EON/Universal wanting to protect their $250 million-$500 million investment by not releasing the movie at a time when most of the world's cinemas have been forcibly closed.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    A lot of people here seem to be shocked at EON/Universal wanting to protect their $250 million-$500 million investment by not releasing the movie at a time when most of the world's cinemas have been forcibly closed.

    For a lot of people here it's time that this Corona pandemic comes to an end. Isolation does weird things to people.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,584
    Or is it because only allowing 1 person for every 4 seats in cinema venues would naturally reduce any potential box office takings from people who actually would be willing to take a trip to the cinema in the current climate?

    I realise that reducing seats would dramatically reduce box office takings, that's simple economics. At least they would get some money now and we would have had a chance to see it, rather than delaying the whole thing to November and hoping for the best (and then possibly delaying it again multiple times - you'll probably feel at that point how I feel now).

    The virus is of course a good enough reason. All I meant was for something like that to happen right at the last moment, felt like a bizarre dream, it didn't seem real - it just seems like cruel fate or incredibly bad luck that actually keeps this film from coming out. Hopefully for the next actor, it would be great if they could get back to a consistent schedule again - something like this wouldn't have otherwise felt to me like the straw that broke the camel's back. I want to keep my hopes up re. streaming (at least if they can't release it in cinemas in November - I'd rather see it at home at that point rather than wait even more if this virus is still around).

    I'm sorry for the comments I made. I had just hoped that more people on here would have agreed with or appreciated my views on this matter and you along with a few others have just belittled and insulted almost everything I've said on this forum about this. Joining this forum was a very bad idea (I've read discussions on this forum for several years but never joined until now because I wanted to talk about this with people who I thought would be like minded Bond fans who might understand my point of view more my close friends in real life). I'm going to look into deleting my account now.

    Usually new members start by introducing themselves in the appropriate thread, and spend time getting to know members. Maybe you have jumped in to the fray without really 'meeting' anyone?

    It's up to you of course.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    NicNac wrote: »
    Or is it because only allowing 1 person for every 4 seats in cinema venues would naturally reduce any potential box office takings from people who actually would be willing to take a trip to the cinema in the current climate?

    I realise that reducing seats would dramatically reduce box office takings, that's simple economics. At least they would get some money now and we would have had a chance to see it, rather than delaying the whole thing to November and hoping for the best (and then possibly delaying it again multiple times - you'll probably feel at that point how I feel now).

    The virus is of course a good enough reason. All I meant was for something like that to happen right at the last moment, felt like a bizarre dream, it didn't seem real - it just seems like cruel fate or incredibly bad luck that actually keeps this film from coming out. Hopefully for the next actor, it would be great if they could get back to a consistent schedule again - something like this wouldn't have otherwise felt to me like the straw that broke the camel's back. I want to keep my hopes up re. streaming (at least if they can't release it in cinemas in November - I'd rather see it at home at that point rather than wait even more if this virus is still around).

    I'm sorry for the comments I made. I had just hoped that more people on here would have agreed with or appreciated my views on this matter and you along with a few others have just belittled and insulted almost everything I've said on this forum about this. Joining this forum was a very bad idea (I've read discussions on this forum for several years but never joined until now because I wanted to talk about this with people who I thought would be like minded Bond fans who might understand my point of view more my close friends in real life). I'm going to look into deleting my account now.

    Usually new members start by introducing themselves in the appropriate thread, and spend time getting to know members. Maybe you have jumped in to the fray without really 'meeting' anyone?

    It's up to you of course.

    fhH7ekI.gif
  • Posts: 4,410
    Meet Our Spring Cover Star: Lashana Lynch
    http://smagazineofficial.com/trending/meet-our-spring-cover-star-lashana-lynch-033019902

    Growing up, Lashana Lynch turned to cartoons for solace in a media landscape in which she rarely saw herself represented. “In my child brain, I was highly frustrated at not seeing something that made sense to me,” the actor says of the lack of black women onscreen during her formative years. Lynch was raised in a traditional Jamaican household in West London and recalls the casting of Jamaican–American powerhouse Grace Jones in the 1985 James Bond film A View to a Kill as a pivotal moment in mainstream media. “I wish I was an adult at that time, to know how it would have felt, as an older Jamaican woman, watching her onscreen and seeing myself. That, I think, would have changed my whole mindset.” Thirty-five years later, Lynch stars in the Bond franchise’s highly anticipated 25th instalment, No Time to Die, with a commitment to empowerment and truth at the core of her role.

    Cary Joji Fukunaga’s No Time to Die sees an off-duty James Bond (Daniel Craig) enjoying a change of pace in blissful Jamaica. Bond’s tranquil hideaway is quickly disrupted when he’s called back into service to rescue a kidnapped scientist, veering him onto the hunt for a mysterious villain who possesses formidable technology. Starring alongside Rami Malek, Léa Seydoux, and Christoph Waltz, Lynch plays Nomi—Bond’s replacement after leaving MI6—granting her a 00 secret agent number and big shoes to fill.

    The road to developing Nomi was pensive and exploratory. Lynch worked closely with sharp-witted writer and fellow British talent Phoebe Waller-Bridge to shape the series’s new character after she was brought onto the screenplay writing team—the second-ever female writer to be credited on a Bond film. The pair found common ground easily. “Not only is she lovely, but she is much like me in that she works from a collaborative place, so I felt like I was creating someone really fresh and dynamic with her—as well as funny.”

    Along with a wry sense of humour, nuanced nods to Nomi’s social awkwardness and struggles with anxiety were integral to Lynch’s portrayal. “Her personality, for me, wouldn’t necessarily fit into ‘the perfect agent,’ but when you get to know her, then you understand why she’s gotten into the work that she has.” At the heart of Nomi lies Lynch’s commitment to depicting realistic, multi-faceted women that defy stereotypes and tropes. As a secret service agent at the top of her game, Nomi is simultaneously poised and self-conscious, level-headed and anxious, and proves that having to overcome daily challenges doesn’t equal weakness. “I look forward to people learning what pushing through anxiety means and what it looks like.”

    Representing femininity and its context in the professional sphere was another essential element in crafting Nomi. Challenging simplified depictions of women in power—including those that choose masculine qualities to signify authority (“like a lady in a big suit”)—Lynch brought a female perspective to the role that took mood, environment, and biology into account. “Hormones can really make a difference to how you approach your work—especially when working in a male-dominated environment—and her mood may not be on point every single day.” She consulted two secret service agents—an American and a Brit who had previously worked on Bond—for insight into navigating the highly demanding world of government espionage as a woman. “I asked them questions like, when do you have lunch? When do you go to the toilet? What happens if you have your period on the job?” Lynch says, to which the real-life agents answered, “You just find time when you find time.”

    The unwavering attention required on the job—and its inevitable discomfort—further deepened Lynch’s portrayal of Nomi and her ability to push through.

    Joining the cast of a film as long-awaited as No Time to Die—from a series as storied as Bond—presented new and unique obstacles. Lynch was challenged by her aim of respecting the classic, long-running allure of the nearly 60-year-old film franchise while simultaneously allowing the modern perspective of her performance to be felt without compromise. “With any franchise that everyone’s been waiting for for years, you want to know that you’re getting it right—but getting it right doesn’t mean right for the audience; it means right for me. I want to know that the person I am creating in my head is actually coming out every day that I’m on set, and that my ideas actually appear on camera.”

    The notion of getting it right for herself gained greater meaning after a barrage of negative comments following the announcement that Lynch would be playing a 00 agent in the upcoming film. The naysayers were self-described diehard Bond fans who objected to the casting, largely spurred on by the misinformation that she would be replacing Bond rather than working in tandem with him. The newly appointed MI6 member found humour in the misled frenzy and kept her distance from the pessimism, whether caused by false interpretation or plain ignorance. “I know, and I learned, that if it was another black girl being cast in this film, they would get exactly the same treatment. These comments have nothing to do with me, so I let them talk and I just kept it moving.”

    Ultimately, any criticism of Lynch’s addition to the cast of No Time to Die was outshone by the outpouring of positivity that ensued. Her social channels quickly flooded with comments reflecting on the progressive implications of a black female 00 agent, and a sense of anything-is-possible optimism, which propelled her forward. “I want audiences to leave with a new sense of agency in that you’re able to be ladylike, elegant, smart, forthright, highly competent, and skilled all at the same time, and you don’t need to compromise anyone for the other.”

    Nomi is just one of many intricate, perspective-shifting roles in Lynch’s acting repertoire. A pupil of classical theatre training at the prestigious Arts Educational Schools London, she began her career with a moving performance of the characteristically male Tybalt in a British stage production of Romeo and Juliet, eventually going onto play Rosaline Capulet in Shonda Rhimes’s American period drama Still Star-Crossed in 2017. Her penchant for the action genre was ignited by her involvement in the 2012 British sports drama Fast Girls—Lynch’s first film—which required rigorous training to portray an athlete on a national track team at the world championships.

    Lynch’s dream of joining the cast of a large-scale action film was fully realized in 2019 when she starred opposite Brie Larson in Captain Marvel—the first female-fronted superhero movie in the Marvel universe—as Maria “Photon” Rambeau. As a pilot, single mother, and best friend to Carol Danvers (the extraterrestrial superhero played by Larson), Lynch brought a grounding “earthling dynamic” to Maria— who, to her initial surprise, lacked superhuman abilities. “What Maria taught me was not every superhero wears a cape. I learned that her superhero power was being herself and having agency, being there for her friends, and being an incredible mother.”

    Captain Marvel rocked the box office, earning the rank of 2019’s fifth-highest-grossing film and boasting the sixth-highest-grossing weekend of all time. But far more exciting than the global visibility given to her acting capabilities was the positive response her performance sparked within single mothers and their daughters, who shared their future ambitions of becoming astronauts and pilots. “It uplifted the black community in a way that made me really proud. Single mothers are so under-represented and do such incredible superhero jobs, and no one even pays attention to the hard work it takes to raise a good child on their own.” The feedback was even more rewarding as a daughter of a single mother herself—the woman to which Lynch’s empowering portrayal of Maria was dedicated.

    A glimpse into her emboldening upbringing illustrates how the British star came to exude such self-assurance and strength in her point of view. Raised by a mother, grandmother, and siblings who all value headstrong honesty, Lynch was taught to always question whether she felt fulfilled in her endeavours and, if not, to seek out a path to internal satisfaction. “It’s engrained in me to push towards what I believe in and what makes sense in my world. I’m a human being first, a woman second, and an actor last.” The deep-seated racism and sexism Lynch encountered within society made her journey to fulfilment difficult at times, but being brought up in an environment in which she was told she could do anything despite what she was told elsewhere allowed her to persevere. “I had to make sense of why, as a young black girl, I was seen as ‘other’ a lot of the time. At a young age, I had to make a choice between having to let that affect my way of being daily or use it and do something about it.”

    Lynch is set to bring her commanding presence to the upcoming FX show Y—an adaptation of Brian K. Vaughan and Pia Guerra’s graphic novel series Y: The Last Man, which tells the tale of a post-apocalyptic Earth run by women, as all men (save for one) have been wiped out by a pandemic. The show’s pilot was directed by Queen and Slim’s Melina Matsoukas (and one of Lynch’s biggest inspirations)—an apt choice to depict the dark, tense, and unironic representation of what a female-fronted world would look like. Starring as Agent 355, Lynch continues her quest to provide meaningful representation for herself, her community, and the future of mainstream media. “I know that I can, for generations to come, be a good example of someone who was there amongst the change, that represented black women, young people, the working class, and the Caribbean Islands living under one roof. It’s all happening now, and I’m grateful to be a part of it.”


    S_LASHANA2-757x1024.jpg
    S_LASHANA3-750x1024.jpg
    S_LASHANA4-756x1024.jpg
    S_LASHANA6-683x1024.jpg
    Page-8_LASHANA.jpg
  • Posts: 4,617
    Just curious, was thinking, is there any reason why EON can't start working on the scripo for the next Bond movie during this period? To put everything on hold seems a real waste of time.
  • Would it matter to you? The financial gains of the people making a movie has never been a consideration to me as to whether I enjoy a film or not. It’s irrelevant. The only way it could affect me is whether it has an impact on making the next one, but these are Bond films: nothing will stop the next one getting made. Especially the truly exceptional circumstances around this one’s release.

    Thank you, this is a very sensible post. I just felt that previous post was trying to provoke me and guilt-trip me (at least in the way it was worded).
    For a lot of people here it's time that this Corona pandemic comes to an end. Isolation does weird things to people.

    Because we can't let this dominate our lives and our thoughts until a vaccine is distributed say 12 - 18 months from now. Life has to carry on as best as it can in the meantime. I'm not going to let it dominate me anyway.
    You ask me: they should release it on streaming. I would even pay as high as 20 pounds to rent the film.

    £20 would be the highest price that I would pay it to rent it. I completely agree with you on this. This will be the last thing I will say on streaming (at least until if they announce that it is coming to streaming).

  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,680
    Thanks for sharing, @Contraband and @Pierce2Daniel!

    Looking forward to seeing Lashana's agent 007.


    Oh, and this just in:

    49723450761_b6686c75c2_o.png
  • I know you're posting that as an April Fools Day joke (not a very funny one I have to say) but you do realise those labels would probably have been printed back in February. Bit irrelevant now.
  • Just curious, was thinking, is there any reason why EON can't start working on the scripo for the next Bond movie during this period? To put everything on hold seems a real waste of time.

    Thanks, I agree with you. At least then the time during this delay will have been used productively and the wait for B26 after that would be far less in the long run.
  • edited April 2020 Posts: 859
    patb wrote: »
    Just curious, was thinking, is there any reason why EON can't start working on the scripo for the next Bond movie during this period? To put everything on hold seems a real waste of time.

    They should have started even before: when the shooting was finished...
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    edited April 2020 Posts: 13,916
    QBranch wrote: »
    Oh, and this just in:

    49723450761_b6686c75c2_o.png
    Awesome, @QBranch. That's becoming a popular item I see.
  • Posts: 727
    No time to Die. Video on demand. 20 pounds. Make it so, EON. Actually reward your loyal fanbase on this time of crisis.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,169
    No time to Die. Video on demand. 20 pounds. Make it so, EON. Actually reward your loyal fanbase on this time of crisis.

    Reward your loyal fanbase and lose countless millions doing so.
    It's not EON's fault that the corona virus struck the world.
    Just because we all want to see NTTD, doesn't mean it's going to happen. NTTD will not be released via streaming services at this time.
  • edited April 2020 Posts: 859
    You know that almost nobody gonna pay 20 pounds? They will download/stream it free from unofficials sources (day 1)... (Expect the fact that 20 pounds sound maybe expensive for a movie that you can't keep more than 48h00 and that you will have to buy again when he gotta realease on dvd/blueray/vod. But even at any price, even at 0,01 pound, lot of people people will prefer to go it for free).

    But well, maybe a important nomber of these people will go back (and paid this time) for see again the film, this time in big screen, on november.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,231
    Benny wrote: »
    No time to Die. Video on demand. 20 pounds. Make it so, EON. Actually reward your loyal fanbase on this time of crisis.

    Reward your loyal fanbase and lose countless millions doing so.
    It's not EON's fault that the corona virus struck the world.
    Just because we all want to see NTTD, doesn't mean it's going to happen. NTTD will not be released via streaming services at this time.

    Thank you, @Benny. This is the truth behind it all, ultimately.
  • Just because we all want to see NTTD, doesn't mean it's going to happen. NTTD will not be released via streaming services at this time.

    Precisely - at this time. Stranger things have happened. Right, that's definitely the last time I'm going to mention streaming now.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,680
    I know you're posting that as an April Fools Day joke (not a very funny one I have to say) but you do realise those labels would probably have been printed back in February. Bit irrelevant now.
    Actually, I didn't post it as an April fool's joke, I just happened to receive the item today. Best not to analyze it too much, it was a throwaway gag. Sorry you didn't find it very funny, I don't know how I'll get to sleep, knowing this. 8->
  • Posts: 787
    I know you're posting that as an April Fools Day joke (not a very funny one I have to say) but you do realise those labels would probably have been printed back in February. Bit irrelevant now.

    You're not off to a sterling start here, friend. Maybe it's time for a reset.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    Benny wrote: »
    No time to Die. Video on demand. 20 pounds. Make it so, EON. Actually reward your loyal fanbase on this time of crisis.

    Reward your loyal fanbase and lose countless millions doing so.
    It's not EON's fault that the corona virus struck the world.
    Just because we all want to see NTTD, doesn't mean it's going to happen. NTTD will not be released via streaming services at this time.

    Thanks for being a voice of reason once more, @Benny.
  • Posts: 1,499
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    No time to Die. Video on demand. 20 pounds. Make it so, EON. Actually reward your loyal fanbase on this time of crisis.

    Reward your loyal fanbase and lose countless millions doing so.
    It's not EON's fault that the corona virus struck the world.
    Just because we all want to see NTTD, doesn't mean it's going to happen. NTTD will not be released via streaming services at this time.

    Thanks for being a voice of reason once more, @Benny.

    Absolutely. NTTD will get a great and wide theatrical release, but only when this terrible virus, which I'm just recovering from, is behind us. With luck, that will be sooner than later, and things will have settled by November.

Sign In or Register to comment.