It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
+1
This picture has a whole new context....that awkward moment when you find out you are the father
I don't either. And I can't think of a reason for them to do it. The more likely scenario is that Bond and Madeleine part ways, for her safety and for the daughter's. This is where both of their pasts lead them to a decision that is best for the child.
That, combined with the report of different endings, makes me believe we should take this with a grain of salt. Also, the timing - during a pandemic lockdown - couldn’t be better to intentionally spread misinformation.
Yeah, she even dresses much vampier in Casino Royale than the Brosnan-M did (and drinks way less!). She doesn't seem quite the same character to me.
Are you sure that's right? I thought Raymond Benson made that up for his books. It's a clunky name somehow.
Yeah, it sounds too peculiar for a James Bond plot. Well, we'll see how it pans out....it doesn't sound thrilling at the moment....but then again, execution is everything, we just hope EON gets it right come November.
To be clear, I'd still happily pay to see that film though. ;)
Weren't the Brosnan-era M and the Craig-era M confirmed to have different real names too? Barbara Mawdsley and Olivia Mansfield respectively. So effectively, different characters?
Anyway yes, ultimately it's alternate timelines, but don't expect Bond to go all Star Trek any time soon and have the next guy reunite with Craig or Brosnan etc...that's when it becomes too out there even for my liking. It all comes back to the same principle of different interpretations of the same character.
Also, I've always seen Connery, Lazenby and Moore as the same Bond, Dalton and Brosnan as the same and Craig as the next.
Yes there are inconsistencies but I base this on two things; the ages of the actors and the fact that every Bond film takes place in the present day of when they were filmed and released.
Except they’re talking about something else. “What is it?” - “You don’t know what it is?”.
Unless "it" is a child.
Yes, you can.
That's how Bondfilms are meant to be seen from the beginning.
90% of the audience in a movie theatre has no clue what happened in any other Bond film.
How weird -- I do almost the same thing! The only difference is, I separate Connery's Bond from the two that followed, mostly because I have a much easier time seeing DAF as a direct sequel to YOLT (and not OHMSS).
See, I don't think they'd even go there, but from things people are saying on here, it looks like people here think they would, most baffling of all, you wouldn't mind!
It's not Toho studios and Godzilla we're talking about here.
Resurrection is not a term that makes sense in what we're talking about - it's a reboot. New person, new timeline. You understood that so why are you rolling with this weird resurrection thing? What was Daniel Craig if this next Bond reboot would be a resurrection? And don't say it's cause Brosnan didn't die because no he didn't, but whether he did or not had no effect on the reboot.
If he dies in a 2020 movie, and he's back in 2025, without any kind of Conan-Doyle style explanation of how he cheated death, then you can call it a 'reboot' all you like - I still call it daft.
We're only five months away, now.
I am feeling confident that we will see NTTD in theaters, on the new release date. Theaters might be limited to 60-70% capacity. And some chains (like AMC, here in the states) might be out of business, so tickets might be scarce and ticket prices might go up substantially.
But the film is coming!
Given the talent on board (CJF and PWB), I'll be shocked if this film's plot is a stinker.
I think we're in for a good time.
Seriously? I don’t think anything could deplete my excitement for a new Bond film. They could cast a giraffe as Bond and I’d say “well let’s see where they’re going with this.” I’ll wait until after it’s out to decide if I dislike it.
It wasn't photographed anywhere I believe, but the quote from Dagbladet (the newspaper the photo above comes from) said:
Other photos featuring the same car (and "couple"):