It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The resident Brosnan fan has spoken. Thread closed. :D
https://www.mi6community.com/discussion/19705/dish-out-of-water-eric-serra-appreciation/p3
My pleasure ;)
Agreed. The score (bar the pre title sequence, love scenes and tank chase) is awful. The car chase is one of the worst, Ill advised scoring in the entire series (including NSNA).
A Barry score would have elevated GE from being an already mediocre entry in the series.
Wow!
Interesting article too;
http://jamesbondradio.com/composer-john-altman-explains-what-went-wrong-with-goldeneyes-score-exclusive-by-matthew-chernov/
The score still has the Bond DNA(albeit in a subtle way) but its sound is more European, Atmospheric & Modern. Another Amazing thing is, Serra didn't have to use the title song or even his beautiful 'The Experience Of Love' to make the score brilliant. That's how a Composer should score a Bond film, if he doesn't want to use the title song, or any song, or sound like Barry.
+1
Eric Serra's score may be the most underrated soundtrack of the series, IMO. It completely encompasses the Cold War tone of the film.
I seriously recommend listening to Serra's work on several Luc Besson films, like the above-mentioned Léon, but also for Le grand bleu (for which he won a César Award), Le cinquième élément, Nikta and Jeanne d'Arc.
Sometimes I think I might not like GE as much without the Serra score...
Nikita is an awesome score.
I get what you mean. I've always been a fan of Serra's work. He was one of the main reasons I went out in theaters to see LUCY and the recent (and pretty mediocre) ANNA because he's one of those few composers that for me enhances what's on screen.
My understanding over the behind the scenes stuff on GE was that EON just did a terrible job of trying to communicate with what they wanted because even they were not totally sure. According to Serra, when they hired him they said they wanted him to deliver a new sound for Bond in the 90s, so he basically approached the film in a way that he normally would score but with a few Bond twists. That's when they would start telling him "no, you need to do the Bond sound". I assume EON genuinely did want a new sound for Bond, but when Serra was actually delivering on that, EON then started second guessing things and panicked over his work.
Below is the Eric Serra interview that reveals some rare info about GE's scoring Process....and Serra's favourite Bond film and all.
http://elsew.com/serra/interv.htm
Yes that's a good way of putting it. I was going to say 'if it had an amazing score it wouldn't really change anything' because as you say, the score it has does everything it needs to. It's romantic and lush when it needs to be, and it's exciting and vibrant when it needs to be. Even the tank chase, which is one of the more perfunctory bits of scoring in the Bond series since Dr No, works perfectly well and provokes the desired effect in the audience. An amazing (or what the OP actually means: traditional) score wouldn't really do much more.
What happened to Serra? You don't hear much of him nowadays.
He only works with Luc Besson these days. His most recent score was for the 2019 action thriller ANNA. He hasn't worked on a Hollywood film since 2003's BULLETPROOF MONK.
To me Campbell has made one brilliant Bond film in CR and another decidedly average Bond film with GE.
I totally agree and I’m still surprised by that fact.
GE was the first Bond film I saw at the cinema. I’d been a Bond fan since 5 and I was 13 in 95. I remember liking the film, but being disappointed in the plot and Brosnan. After the thrill of Licence to Kill on Sky Movies I felt GE was a step backwards in plot and performance quality. I was also very confused at the lack of the Bond theme in the ‘weird’ score.
In my opinion there is nothing wrong with GE as a film, I just find it all very ‘middle of the road’.
Not a common view I’ll admit.
When Ourumov learns about the two missing programmers, a thunderous sound starts playing in the background. When he and Xenia begin their process of stealing the GoldenEye, the metallic beats are cold and threatening. This is good stuff for the mood of the film. 2008's Arnold might have pulled it off too; 1995's Arnold was too brassy for that.
The premise of the question is false. An "amazing" score? It's about finding the proper score for the film. Even if people resent the score when listening to it in isolation, for the movie, it works. The score speaks the exact same language as the rest of the film. It's an adequate score. "Amazing" has nothing to do with it. GE took the risk of being outdated by new technology fast. Look at the OS they have on their computer screens. So if it is to be viewed in a time capsule, every aspect of the film might as well exist in a time capsule. Serra's score screams early to mid '90s. It's not timeless, but hey, this Bond film clearly wasn't intended to be timeless, at least not in its presentation of technology, on which this film heavily relies.
It's still one of my absolute favourites. And I wouldn't want this dish served with any other score.
Some very good tracks from Serra's 'La Femme Nikita'....Unique tracks that further unveils this guy's Unorthodox Awesomeness.
No wonder Barry suggested him.