It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
That’s pretty much it spot on. Binder should have tried to go in different and far out directions after this, but what we mostly got was a series of lessening imitations (of course he could still strike gold occasionally, per TSWLM). Kleinman gave us a much needed rethinking of the possibilities. And I’ve always had my issues with use of CGI, but a Title Sequence is the ideal place to exploit that medium.
I was the gold medal for Skyfall, btw. Brilliant titles. They're a visual feast on par with Deakins' cinematography. I understand some don't like the titles covering so many different concepts from the film, but this was the first time they had done that and I thought it was done brilliantly and tastefully here. The journey through the graveyard, the swooping Macau dragons, the Rorschach imagery, the apocalyptic meteors raining down destroying everything, the zoom into Bond's eye... These are the coolest, most evocative titles yet in my opinion.
As for the random images from prior films, I think that they were a means to connect OHMSS with those films. “Don’t worry folks, the new actor is still the same character!” - which would have been a major concern to EON back in 1969 as it was the first time, they had ever recast Bond. After five recastings (soon to be six) over the decades, we’re now used to it; audiences back in 1969, probably not so much IMO. Plus, seeing Akiko Wakabayashi’s smile from YOLT is always welcome!
Viewed today - for me - it passes my primary test: If I see the OHMSS titles on YouTube does it excite me to see the film? Yes, it does!
Of course, what does it matter what I think? I'm the guy who tried to talk Selznick out of doing "Gone with the Wind"! **
** bonus points for naming the film this quote is taken from 😊!
PS. Binder seems to have kept his sound stage nice and cold! =))
THE SPY WHO LOVED ME
Main title sequence designed by
MAURICE BINDER
Two silver medals were noted for the highest ranked title sequence of the Moore years. The other top 10 rankings were one 4th, one 5th, one 6th, one 8th, one 9th and one 10th place.
One member placed TSWLM 25th, making it the only top 5 entry that received a bottom 3 finish.
In total the main title sequence of TSWLM obtained 105 points.
It's got all the right elements to make a classic Bond title sequence. Brilliant stuff.
Edit - So that leaves GF, TB, GE and CR left. Is that right?
"Ooh bit o'bush."
"Walking on top of a gun-- completely billy bollocks."
"One more big swing from a woman. Legs go right up-- oh, what was that-- too late!"
Haha, I was about to write the only thing better than TSWLM's title sequence is Alan Partridge's commentary of it.
I had this at #11. Lovely combinations of blues and reds to go with both the Union Jack and Bond's alliance with a Russian agent. It goes superbly with Simon's song too. Binder really came out blazing with this title sequence. It's as iconic as any of them.
Correct!
I ranked TSWLM as #11. A very good sequence with a lot of new and creative ideas. I like it that Moore is a part of the titles.
That's very kind of you! Sincere thanks!
I'm sure my comment sounded a little OCD or something, but I used to be a kind of a nerd about design, and I do tend to notice text stuff too much. I don't remember what my other comment was, but it was probably about spacing in some of David Arnold's titles. :))
This is a great sequence though. I honestly like pretty much all of them apart from Octopussy. And TB and GE are in my top four, like everyone else, apparently! ;)
GOLDFINGER
Main title sequence designed by
ROBERT BROWNJOHN
With both FRWL and GF in the top 10, Brownjohn scores a perfect 2 out of 2, even though only one member rated one of his sequences as his/her favourite.
And that wasn’t GF, whose highest rating was one second place, making GF the highest-rated entry without a gold medal.
Still though, GF remains very popular with two 4th places, three 5th places, three 7th places and one 8th place.
With a single 24th place, GF is also the highest-ranked entry with a bottom 5 finish.
GF’s main title sequence received a total of 109 points.
Same here. 5th. Great, just great.
Still great title work though from Robert Brownjohn.
THUNDERBALL
Main title sequence designed by
MAURICE BINDER
The highest-ranked of the Binder/Brownjohn era, TB remains a clear favourite, even though it got outranked by two Kleinman efforts.
TB obtained two gold medals, three silvers and two bronzes. There was also a 4th, a 6th, a 7th and a 10th place finish to be noted.
Furthermore, it ended up in everyone’s top 15, with a single 15th place finish as its lowest score.
With a total of 126 points TB’s main title sequence claims the title of best-liked pre-1990 title sequence.