It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It’s his laziness. It drastically changes in NSNA too
That actually would have made much more sense
Related, would Mr. Broccoli have warmed to a reboot with Dalton if the film rights to Casino Royale were available at the time. That would have been epic, but I don't think the filmmakers were brave enough at the time to execute as boldly as happened with Craig.
The right answer is: we'll never know.
My personal viewpoint ?...no i dont think he would.
A blonde Bond,built like a brick shithouse,i dont think Cubby would go for that.
I think Brosnan would have got 2 more films if Cubby was still there,and DAD would never have been made the way it was.
Cubby's influence was in GE,you can see it .
Thats a very good point. He for sure would have given Brosnan at least as 5th film.
Might be the only Bond actor to not be seen bleeding.
https://imgur.com/NW8jPyR
I stand corrected.
Here is a question. Do you think(or does anyone know) if TLD script was the same as was written when Brosnan was due to be cast in that film? Or was it tailored to suit Dalton more?
Same question regarding Marvin Hamlisch, Bill Conti and Michael Kamen. (I remember an interview in which Hamlisch said he didn't understand the reason himself.)
I know why Serra didn't. No need to explain that one.
In TMWTGG, why during the pts does Rodney hide behind the triangle things, when he surely can see Scaramanga's golden gun?
Why not just take the gun, leaving Scaramanga defenceless?
Yes always
The reason I suggested this change in Villiers is because I've seen Tobias Menzies in many shows and films in the recent years and I wouldn't say he looks anything like his 2006 counterpart. I couldn't imagine this man playing an ordinary frightened civilian or a secretary. He'd adopt a tough persona, in my opinion. At least that's how I'd do it had it been me to bring Villiers back.
Heck, he could very well be the Jack Ryan of the Bond franchise.
He would be 1000% a better asset to the Bond series than bloody Tanner.
I would welcome him back,and Menzies has become a very good actor with screen presence.
Imagine Villiers being the analyst-turned-competent officer while being a Whitehall mandarin himself.
I figure Bond would appreciate an ally like that, and compliment Villiers' conversion.
Considering the last time he saw him,as a rookie,and the reaction to Solange's body,i agree,i think Bond would be impressed at the transformation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=52&v=I8joR1JE51M
https://bit.ly/2Dpjs5o
Villiers is quite capable... At desk work. In any case, Tobias Menzies is really good at playing these rather weak but well meaning authority figures. Brutus, Edmure Tully... They're not bad, they just lack a certain edge that prevents them to be great.