SirHenryLeeChaChing's For Original Fans - Favorite Moments In NTTD (spoilers)

1103104106108109225

Comments

  • edited August 2014 Posts: 11,189
    @DarthDimi. I suppose I never really cared for anything in the early 70s. I was never into Bruce Lee, saw a few Blaxploitation films at university but that was about it and never watched Charlies Angels or The Dukes of Hazard. I just can't really connect to it. That sort of era has never really appealed to me and feels too isolated to its time.

    The only films of that period I suppose I really liked were The Godfather and Get Carter. which both had nothing to do with Bond.

    I enjoyed the likes of North By Northwest (FRWL), Indiana Jones (Octopussy), True Lies (Goldeneye) and The Bourne films (Casino Royale - Skyfall). Perhaps thats why I can appreciate those Bond movies more.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,723
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @BAIN123, that's exactly part of their appeal for me. If I want a Bond film that reminds me of the good old days of Shaft and Foxy Brown, I have LALD. If I want a Bond film that reminds me of the good old days of Tony Rome and some other comedic cop films of the early 70s, I have DAF. And obviously TMWTGG takes us back to the Bruce Lee era.

    Each Bond film, even DAD, is a child of its time. Twenty years from now, we'll be laughing when we remember the days when CGI so obviously looked like CGI, the days before the likes of Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes made CGI virtually indistinguishable from the real stuff. And in a way it may be 'good' that we have a Bond film even in that department. ;-) (Yeah, I know, it's a stretch but still.)

    Remember Hitchcock? --> FRWL
    Remember Miami Vice? --> LTK
    Remember Bourne? --> QOS
    ...

    I think this is precisely part of the appeal of over half a century of cinematic Bond. Bond does not withstand the erosion of time; Bond almost symbolises it like few other film series do. And frankly, that's at least one reason why I'm such a fan of the Bonds. The formula may be timeless, the character of Bond may be timeless (despite a few trend shifts here and there) but the contemporary lay-out of each film is cemented in that narrow time interval in which the film is released. The Bond series is part of our cinematic history rather than disconnected from it. And why should that be a bad thing?

    'Outdated' sounds so bad when in fact I doubt it is. I would rather think of the Bonds as monuments in the history of film, not ruins that should shame away because they are old. I'm always a little angry when people call themselves "Bond fans" while they strictly love the Craig films but admit they haven't watched nor feel inclined to watch the older Bonds. Most of the Bonds were once the coolest thing of the moment. So were Shakespeare and Mozart. They no longer are. But they have become part of our cultural DNA, which is far better in the end than being the coolest thing around. I think the same applies to Bond. The Bonds really have found their way into our cultural DNA and my guess is they will stay there, like the stories of Jules Verne, E.A. Poe or H.G. Wells, and like the music of Bach and Beethoven. Transformers may be cool today, but unlike Bond, Transformers will not grow into a branch on the tree of cultural eternity, or so I think. Kids eventually outgrow Transformers and as young adults or grown-ups discover the timeless cool of for example the Connery Bond. Because like I said, while the older Bond movies may be built from certain elements that are only found at exhibitions or in collections today (e.g. the cars, the clothes, the tech), Bond himself isn't a slave to the fourth dimension, he commands it.

    Hear hear @Dimi! I seem to remember from a (long) while ago the two of us agreeing that Bond films can be taken as historical documents of the last 50 years in several aspects - politics, geopolitics, technology, style, clothing... :)
  • edited August 2014 Posts: 3,566
    DarthDimi wrote: »

    I think this is precisely part of the appeal of over half a century of cinematic Bond. Bond does not withstand the erosion of time; Bond almost symbolises it like few other film series do.

    Now that's an interesting point, @Darth, one I hadn't really considered before. In a very real sense, Eon has always tried to have the Bond films be both timeless AND solidly a part of their times. It's a difficult goal, one that they can't always attain...but like Bond himself, they'll always be out there striving for success!

  • TND is one that's managed to become more relevant since its release, with the rise of the internet media and some of the worst yellow journalism and information bubbles in a long time.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited August 2014 Posts: 17,838
    TND is one that's managed to become more relevant since its release, with the rise of the internet media and some of the worst yellow journalism and information bubbles in a long time.
    YES!!!!!!!!!!
    9is this mountain computer working/0
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    So you're typing while climbing a mountain, aren't you, @chrisisall? :-bd Gotta love that! A true Bond fan.

    As for me, I am quite happy to see so many great comments and thoughtful and fun observations. I agree with much of what I am reading here.

    I am typing while lying sideways on my bed with my leg propped up and my knee wrapped. It is slightly better. Typhoon just finished and I have no commitments today for a change, so I am just resting. I really need it.

    Carry on, everybody! :>
  • Posts: 3,334
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    @DarthDimi. I suppose I never really cared for anything in the early 70s. I was never into Bruce Lee, saw a few Blaxploitation films at university but that was about it and never watched Charlies Angels or The Dukes of Hazard. I just can't really connect to it. That sort of era has never really appealed to me and feels too isolated to its time.

    The only films of that period I suppose I really liked were The Godfather and Get Carter. which both had nothing to do with Bond.

    I enjoyed the likes of North By Northwest (FRWL), Indiana Jones (Octopussy), True Lies (Goldeneye) and The Bourne films (Casino Royale - Skyfall). Perhaps thats why I can appreciate those Bond movies more.

    No offence, BAIN but I think you need to brush up on your 70's movies as that period produced some of the best movies in modern times. How can you not be impressed with Three Days of the Condor, The Conversation, The Parallax View, The Day of the Jackal, The Odessa File, The French Connection, to name but a few? I also didn't watch Charlies Angels in the 70's but then I wouldn't use that to define one of the most creative cinematic decades. And as for Dukes, I associate that more with the 80's than 70's.
  • edited August 2014 Posts: 11,189
    How could I forget The French Connection? :P There's also All The President's Men, Dirty Harry and yes I liked The Day of The Jackal (though its been a while since I've seen it).

    I suppose what I meant was that I wasn't into the films/style that Bond nodded to during that period.

    Forgive me @bondsum :\">
  • edited August 2014 Posts: 3,334
    You're forgiven, @BAIN. Though there's only really LALD's tenuous link to Blaxploitation and TMWTGG's link to Kung Fu that has any cinematic nods for that period. DAF is really doing its own thing and can't be considered to be following any current trends.

    It's funny, every time I see that scene in QoS where Bond leaves Green to die in the desert I always think of the scene in The Eiger Sanction... another 70's movie!!
  • Posts: 6,396
    bondsum wrote: »
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    @DarthDimi. I suppose I never really cared for anything in the early 70s. I was never into Bruce Lee, saw a few Blaxploitation films at university but that was about it and never watched Charlies Angels or The Dukes of Hazard. I just can't really connect to it. That sort of era has never really appealed to me and feels too isolated to its time.

    The only films of that period I suppose I really liked were The Godfather and Get Carter. which both had nothing to do with Bond.

    I enjoyed the likes of North By Northwest (FRWL), Indiana Jones (Octopussy), True Lies (Goldeneye) and The Bourne films (Casino Royale - Skyfall). Perhaps thats why I can appreciate those Bond movies more.

    No offence, BAIN but I think you need to brush up on your 70's movies as that period produced some of the best movies in modern times. How can you not be impressed with Three Days of the Condor, The Conversation, The Parallax View, The Day of the Jackal, The Odessa File, The French Connection, to name but a few? I also didn't watch Charlies Angels in the 70's but then I wouldn't use that to define one of the most creative cinematic decades. And as for Dukes, I associate that more with the 80's than 70's.

    I highly approve of all of these films. =D>
  • Posts: 11,189
    I'd like to hear Sean Connery say "The Frensh Conecshion" :p
  • KerimKerim Istanbul Not Constantinople
    Posts: 2,629
    Let's answer the M questions first.

    1 ~ Is it a good idea to have M be a woman once again, after Fiennes tenure ends?

    I wouldn't object to it, but it would need to be someone near Judi Dench's acting level and less maternal. After Ralph Fiennes's run, I'm thinking Helena Bonham Carter with a toned down wardrobe and again, less maternal.

    2 ~ How long do you think Fiennes will play M? Only during Craig's era? Which may be only 2 more films. Will he - or should he - continue with the next Bond actor?

    I think Ralph will have a good run as M that will go beyond the Craig era. I daresay 2030 for him. He's still young enough where he could play M for a while. I'm one of those who thinks there should be some sort of continuity with the cast. Fiennes or Ben Whishaw would be the best candidates. Heck, if everything plays out right, Ben could make it to Bond 100.

    3 ~ Do you want to see M now go through his own story arc, over the course of the next films? Do you want that to be a part of the plot, or just a minor reference if anything at all?

    I think we should go back to the traditional M who is there when needed or at least for the next few films to make it more about Bond than Bond and M. At the most, a storyline within a storyline.

    4 ~ Do you want this M to be married or stay single? (I do not think we know if he is married yet, not specifically).

    Let's leave M's personal life out of the future storylines.


    Ranking of the M's:

    1. Bernard Lee: The first, the best, the prototype.
    2. Judi Dench: When you have Judi Dench at your disposal, you kind of have to give more than just a desk job. I don't think another female could have pulled off her M character though.
    3. Robert Brown: Was actually a good M and stay in the Bernard Lee vain. He was just overshadowed by Lee and Dench.
    4. Ralph Fiennes: A worthy actor of filling Judi Dench's shoes. Let's see where he goes with the M character.

  • KerimKerim Istanbul Not Constantinople
    edited August 2014 Posts: 2,629
    Timeless or Dated (I'll stay in the 20th Century):

    Timeless:

    FRWL - A timeless classic representing the early 60s before the hippies ruled the planet.
    TB - A well preserved film that addresses the nuclear era and how close we were to blowing ourselves up.
    FYEO - The score may be dated, but the best of the latter Cold War era with a simple plot that could yet hold true. Also, the first we saw a main character as a double agent.
    TLD - Remember the good old days when the US and UK would support rogue Middle Eastern sects fighting off Commies? Those rogue Middle Eastern sects are still around.
    LTK - While toned down from the late 80s/early 90s, there's still drug cartels and violence out there.
    GE - GE's plot could somewhat play out with Putin running Russia.
    TND - There's still mad media moguls out there who would do less crazier stuff for ratings.
    TWINE - Stockholm Syndrome/PTSD is a relevant issue today.

    Dated:

    DN - Even during its release, DN felt very retro 50s.
    GF - No one's crazy enough to try to break into Fort Knox.
    YOLT - We now know there's no such thing as spaceship eating spaceships being launched through an active volcano.
    OHMSS - Enough of a psychedelic feel to it to make OHMSS seem dated.
    All the 70s films - Diamond satellites, Blaxploitation, horrible fashion, disco, OTT fascination with space, pick one.
    OP - Very timely during the height of the Cold War, but not so much now.
    AVTAK - This film was dated when it was released. Also, I ruled GF as being dated.



  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,272
    Hear hear @Dimi! I seem to remember from a (long) while ago the two of us agreeing that Bond films can be taken as historical documents of the last 50 years in several aspects - politics, geopolitics, technology, style, clothing... :)

    And indeed they are, @DaltonCraig007! I learned more about the Cold War from Fleming and the Bond films than from my history teacher. ;-)

    Not a joke, by the way. :-)

  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited August 2014 Posts: 12,480
    Well, I am functioning and off to teach soon. Bicycling very slowly with a wrapped knee. It is definitely slightly better, so ... onwards. :)

    I'm very happy to read the participation on here; good reading. Nice to see DarthDimi, 0013, BAIN123, soundofthesinners, Anon, DaltonCraig007, Bondsum, and WillyGalore here, too; along with our BeatlesSansEarmuffs, OHMSS69. and chrisisall.

    @Kerim, that was laid out very well and I agree with all of your thoughts on M (I can even picture Bonham Carter in the role!). Your lists for dated and timeless have me thinking that over again. I'll post my thoughts on dated and timeless more fully late today.

    Cheers! B-)
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,272
    Well, @4EverBonded, I'm really not an 'original' but maybe it helps that I was conceived by originals around the time when FYEO was released. ;-)
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited August 2014 Posts: 12,480
    Exactly. :) Our core foundation of this thread are Originals, but we welcome good contributions from all agents. B-)

    So you sort of have FYEO in your blood. Not bad. ;) One of my fav films.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited August 2014 Posts: 17,838
    My Son, his friend and I climbed the first (smaller) mountain today, and I SWEAR if they would have allowed it we would have watched a Bond film on my handy-dandy portable DVD player on top of it! Alas, it was not in Solitaire's cards.... still, the climb was fun, if nowhere the climb Bond made in FYEO!!!
    And btw, DAF is NOT that dated IMO because it swims in TWO eras & therefore is bound to neither.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited August 2014 Posts: 12,480
    Congrats on the mountain climbing, chrisisall (and sonisiall - I love that nickname!). :)
    :-bd

    When I hear the word "dated" like something is dated, it carries a bit of a negative meaning for me. But that is not necessarily fully what I mean at times. It does mean to me that something (film, photo, drawing, music, whatever) reflects a specific previous time or era.

    "Timeless" for me means that something is still relevant and meaningful and attractive today as it was when it was first produced. It can still carry the style and themes of a particular period.

    Anyway, I'd like to list some moments in Bond films that I consider dated, a combination of those that simply reflect a style or period strongly and those that don't seem to fit today, carry a more negative connotation for me, or are a bit "out of synch" in feeling:

    Dated (some I mentioned previously):

    ~ Bond slapping Dink's bottom and telling her to leave, saying "Man-talk". AND Sean's ridiculous terry cloth (or poplin; whatever) outfit. I mean, really.
    ~ The hats on the men in the earliest Bond films (as chrisisall mentioned); definitely dated but that just contributes to the authenticity of the time period
    ~ the two gypsy women fighting and the ambiance/attitude that permeates it in FRWL
    ~ the clothes and godawful rather dated music of TMWTGG (although I also find it amusing, it is definitely dated); also the karate/kung fu fight by the schoolgirls and Moore in the same film
    ~ the costumes and attitudes displayed in LALD (again, I find it a rather amusing period piece; not saying that is a big negative, just that it is dated)
    ~ The Afghan freedom fighters in TLD
    ~ Pam's entire wardrobe in the whole film (LTK)
    ~ Moneypenny in TLD (Do I really need to elaborate? No, I didn't think so.)
    ~ The disco influenced tracks in FYEO
    ~ The entire trippy 60's feel of OHMSS really dates it
    ~ Turning Sean Japanese in YOLT (would that be dated? or just a very BAD IDEA?) ;)
    ~ the virtual reality scene in DAD

    I'm sure I can add more later, but that is my first full list of dated moments in Bond films. B-)

  • Posts: 7,653
    when a movie franchise is 50 years old the chance of some of the movies being dated is factual, so I cannot be really bothered about it.

    For the younger members this will be bigger problem, as it is I find the franchise full of thrythfull moments that are a document of their time. Some less complimentary as one would want, but it represents a half century of movie making and shows the world changing and 007 with it, again not always for the best.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    Yes, Bond films offer glimpses of other times. In some ways I definitely like that. I find it interesting when looking at films from the different decades, to see our world (or Bond's world) reflecting the times of each film. I think there are young people who can allow themselves to be drawn into a film from any decade, and there are some who won't find that appealing. True of any generation, I guess.

    FRWL is dated in the sense of representing culture, clothes style, music, etc. But the quality of the whole film shines through. So though it captures a period of time well, it also rises above that to simply be a story well told that is in its own way rather timeless in its appeal.

    I will list some more moments I feel are timeless in a few hours. I've got to get back to sleep now. Carry on, everybody.

    We shall have one more day for this topic, then move on to Humor in Bond Films.
    :)>-
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    I have mentioned some timeless moments for me. Now I'm going to look at Bond films in their entirety. Is there a Bond film that is truly timeless?
    They are always of their time and of course the wardrobe, hair styles, office machines, transportation, etc. will reflect that.

    For me, I'm going to say the following films are timeless Bond films. By that I mean they have stood the test of time, and although dated by wardrobe and other factors perhaps, they are of such quality that the story as told in that particular film still has good merit. With that explanation, I'll say only four, with the top two being the strongest:

    From Russia With Love
    Casino Royale
    For Your Eyes Only
    Tomorrow Never Dies

    When I think of Bond films, I really do not mind them being a capsule of their era; I enjoy that for the most part. I find that a few films are so excellent that they just stand out in quality and will probably always stay in the upper half of my rankings.
    I also find many lovely timeless moments in Bond films. I may list more specific scenes later. But that is my impression of the overall timeless Bond films, taken as a whole film. (And it is too soon for me to list Skyfall, but it is in my top ten and a few years from now I may consider that as timeless, too. I think its fine qualities will last.)

    I will switch our topic over to Bond Humor in about 12 hours. So please list your "dated" or "timeless" elements of Bond films, or entire films, today. This has been a great round of discussion; thanks to all.

    Cheers! B-)
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,838
    My last minute comment: the most timeless Bonds for me are DN (okay there are some particular moments, all which have been noted, but overall it just seems SO far ahead of its time for me), TB, TLD (despite the 'freedom fighter' malarky) & TND.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    I quite like TLD and find it for the most part to be not dated in a bad way (minus the freedom fighters, I think it holds up well).
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited August 2014 Posts: 12,480
    Okay, it is time to switch over to our next topic. That was a good round of comments regarding dated or timeless Bond films. We are now heading towards the more amusing side of Bond films: Humor in Bond films: What makes us laugh, chuckle, or smile?

    It's funny, isn't it? Humor is such a flexible thing. ;)
    Everybody thinks they have a sense of humor. What some people enjoy as funny, others may be bored or baffled by it. With a British spy at the heart of the Bond stories, humor is not the natural comfy overall fit for these films. Plus, since Bond began and became the iconic mega spy of all spies, imitators abound, all flush with varying levels of humor. So let's look at humor in all of the Bond films, through the entire series. :O)

    Please give your thoughts on humor, in any way you'd like. Short and sweet. Full essays. Favorites vs. Duds. Any discussion is welcome.
    Here are just some things to think about for this topic:

    ~ What examples of humor do you find in early Bond films?

    ~ How did humor change during the following years?

    ~ What was the first instance of "over the top" humor?

    ~ How much humor is needed in a Bond film, anyway?

    ~ Which are your favorite humorous scenes?

    ~ Which films have a good balance of humor and which seem far too campy, over the top, or just misfired/misplaced humor?

    ~ Which Bond actor's handling of humor do you like best? Or like least
    ?

    I'll be posting my initial thoughts later, but please do jump right in. I'm looking forward to reading your comments about humor and James Bond. Yes, considerably. :>
  • Posts: 2,341
    My thoughts opinions regarding humor: I want to avoid a too long post and will have to break it down into parts for my fellow afficiandos. So forgive me.

    The first attempt at humor we find is in DN when Bond tells the officers at King House to "make sure he doesn't get away." As far as I can recall this is the first attempt at humor in what up to this point had been a pretty serious thriller.
    Throughout the decade of the sixties, there are some well placed one liners here and there. FRWL, like DN seemed to keep the one liners to the bare minimial.
    It was with the third film and with first time Bond director, Guy Hamilton that we see more light hearted stuff but all in all it was presented in a tasteful manner.
    Sean Connery was also good at going from tough gentleman agent to a fun one liner here and there. Most memorable would be in TB: the comment after he kills the sadistic Vargas, and after Fiona Volpe meets her demise.

    The humor began to get out of hand with the 1970's. Starting with DAF. EON decided it was time to have fun with the Bond image and they tossed a thrilling plot from the book aside, the pull to make a serious revenge film and replaced it with a campy, light hearted fest. Though DAF has its serious moments, the film still has some silly humor that ruined it for me. The all low being when they decided that Blofeld should compete with Norman Bates as the World's Worst Cross Dresser.

    Roger Moore stepped in and the humor was found to be his strong suit and the productions began to play to this more and more. His early films followed the trend of DAF but the humor hit an all time low with MR, his fourth outing.
    The attempt was made to tone it down some, so for the remainder of Moore's tenue, his films would follow the standard set by TSWLM. A good blend of suspense, and thrills but some well placed humor thrown in here and there. IMO, his sixth film, OP like TSWLM managed to find a good balance between the suspense and the humorous stuff.

  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    Thanks, @OHMSS69. This is a great start! Looking forward to more of your thoughts a little later. Never mind writing "long posts;" I'm not the only one who enjoys them. :-bd

    Yes, I concur with you that the first crossing over into injecting more definite, and stronger/campier humor into the series first really happened with DAF. My goodness, yes, it was startlingly different from the previous Bond films when it comes to humor. I enjoyed Wint and Kidd but was still taken aback a bit by them, and then when Blofeld made his girlish disguise debut, I was flummoxed. DAF is such a mixed bag, in my opinion.

    I also feel that FYEO was a great Bond film and was the most balanced regarding humor of all of Moore's films. Octopussy was mostly okay in that department, with a couple of OTT instances.

    Moore, for sure, could handle light humor and throwaway quips better than any other Bond actor (better than most actors of any kind of film, period). Playing to that strength was okay when it was balanced.

    I do like this icon because of Sir Roger: :>
  • Posts: 12,526
    Humor is one of the best aspects of the Bond series. I honestly love the very subtle humor moments a lot, like Bond closing the door on the henchmen in TB or quipping, "I'd rather not" to Helga in YOLT.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,838
    The humor was pitch-perfect for the most part in all of the Sixties films, the single funniest delivery coming in TB with Fiona's demise. The simple loathing topped with delight in Connery's voice was quietly, awesomely hilarious.

    The Seventies was a loss. Yeah, Connery handled quips well in DAF, but in general it was Adam West Batman time at the MI6 safe house.

    The Eighties was the new era of increasing humor restraint (and therefore effectiveness) culminating in Dalton's two- chuckles were not as well handled since the Sixties! Bravo!

    Humor in the Nineties was like what you brought home on Halloween as a kid; some of it was delicious and some of it went right to the garbage can (fancy way of saying a mixed bag).

    The 21st Century has been harsh. DAD was unintentionally humorous while attempting seriousness and too silly whilst attempting the humorous, and Craig's films have been fairly straightforwardly dire.




  • edited August 2014 Posts: 2,341
    I want to take the time and answer a couple of the questions suggested by @4EverBonded.

    My favorite humor scenes? The ones that come to mind for me would be the comment made by Sharkey after Killifer is killed. "What a Waste...The Money." and the face he makes is timeless. Interesting that this humorous one liner was not delivered by Dalton but by a supporting actor.
    Another one of my favorites would be the OP scenes with the gorilla suit. I know some of my fellow originals will classify it as OTT but I found the whole scene rather humorous. Especially when Moore in gorilla suit quickly checks his watch for the time. I just burst out laughing whenever I see this scene. The scenes prior to the Tiger hunt when Bond is pretending to be a corpse. Really funny.

    Which films had the best balance? Like I said earlier my nominations would be TSWLM and OP. The most OTT? DAF and MR. MR could have been an entertaining film had it been edited more tightly, instead it falls too far into slapstick and this just ruins the film. DAF is plain bad.

    Which actor had the best delivery? Sean Connery. He originated the one lines and like @chrisisall says, the loathing and delight just makes his one liners timeless.
    The worst? it would be easy to dump on Dalton here as the one liners were not his strong suit but I reserve my dumping for Pierce Brosnan. His humor just felt forced and like he was trying too hard instead of just being himself. All the other Bonds got it for the most part but Pierce just falls so short.

    Let us remember that humor is not always limited to a one liner and comedic timing.
Sign In or Register to comment.