It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Members at the time of SirHenry's passing did decide to continue, and we shall. :) It is good to remind everybody once in a while about the earlier pages which do contain hidden treasure.
@4EverBonded I love this from Sir Henry-- a few of our warrior keyboard champs should read this review, posted by a man who was there from the beginning. He was articulate, honest and knew when he was wrong. To him it wasn't about how many posts, but the quality of posts-- which means, as I am learning, being open, honest and humble.
As you said yesterday: take off the gloves and argue about Craig on another thread-- well spoken, by the way!
You can find SirHenry's rankings and reviews, as well as production/trivia notes when given. His ranking for the film is first, then his personal review is the first page # listed; and when he added a lot of trivia information about a film (only FYEO thru Skyfall), the second page # listed is for that add'l info (lots of production notes and little known details).
On these pages you will also see other members' reviews. So take your time, enjoy. There is plenty here that is interesting and still fresh. B-)
SirHenry's ranking/review's page#
Dr. No - 3.4/ Page 3
FRWL - 4.2/ Page 3
GF - 4.5/ Page 4
TB - 4.2/ Page 5
YOLT - 3.8/ Page 6
OHMSS - 3.7/ Page 7
DAF - 3.0/ Page 7
LALD - 4.1/ Page 9
TMWTGG - 3.2/ Page 9
TSWLM - 4.0/ Page 10
MR- 2.8/ Page 11
FYEO - 4.1/ Page 12; trivia notes Page 45
OP - 3.5/ Page 13; trivia notes Page 47
AVTAK - 3.3/ Page 13; trivia notes Page 50
TLD - 4.1/ Page 15; trivia notes Page 51
LTK - 4.3/ Page 15; trivia notes Page 52
GE - 3.9/ Page 19; trivia notes Page 55
TND - 3.7/ Page 19; trivia notes Page 57
TWINE - 3.2/ Page 19; trivia notes Page 58
DAD - 2.6/ Page 20; trivia notes Page 59
CR - 4.4/ Page 21; trivia notes Page 62
QOS - 3.5/ Page 23; trivia notes Page 63
SF - 4.1/ Page 27; trivia notes Page 65
There's just an amazing respect with this bunch of wonderful personalities (which, reading the B25 thread again today was shameful. Everyone has a right to their feelings and opinions, and not one poster said differently, not one-- until one did-- to create what??-- only he can answer).
This thread is polite discourse, and should be aspired to.
Wonderful fans; articulate, passionate and open.
I've been meaning to address the issue of "Bond locations" for awhile now, and in fact have touched briefly on the point in my review of A View to a Kill. While many have judged this film as one of their lesser favorites, I'm particularly fond of it because of the San Francisco bay area locations. As a long time bay area resident, I just love seeing Bond escaping from a fire in SF City Hall, then jumping a fire truck over the Lefty O'Doul bridge. One of the outtakes to this film shown on the MGM Special Edition DVD, with Bond reconnoitering an oil refinery from a boat, and several protesters nearby in their own craft, is a particular favorite, as the refinery used is clearly the Chevron oil refinery in Pt. Richmond...and Richmond was my home town when I first became a Bond fan back around 1964! The joy I get from seeing 007 tooling around in my home spaces is such that A View to a Kill will always get a better reception from this viewer than it does from many others. I may never see the sights from Piz Gloria... but I'll always have a special appreciation for the reverberations of Tanya Roberts' voice as she shouts, "JAaaaaaaames!" from inside that elevator shaft.
Seems this coincides with my feelings about TND, somehow...
That leaves me to ask you people the next question which I probably can't ask anywhere else because of the 'negative' connotation, but in what film(s) do you think are Bond locations used better than in the Bond-film.
i.e. as said Amterdam is used far better in the Hitman' then in DAF. On the other hand I haven't seen a film using Udaipur better then OP does, even though many films were shot there. And I don't think any other film uses the Golden Gate Bridge better then AVTAK. Any thoughts?
So looking at the other side, which locations in Bond films were underused or used much better in other films. Well, I suppose we can look at the secondary locations in Bond films, where he did not spend much time. Let me think.
First, I agree Amsterdam was not used much at all and that is a shame.
Also, I felt Rome was not used as well as it could have been in Spectre.
Golden Gate Bridge - there surely are other films using it well, but I cannot think of any. @BeatlesSansEarmuffs and @Birdleson, what can you add to this topic? You can remember way more films and locations than I can, and you both know California.
Indeed not quite what I had in mind when I talked about Bond locations, but Luciana for sure makes it an alluring film. Would be interesting to see it. There's also the fantastic Ram Leela that came out a few years ago (a typical Bollywood film (and there've been many Ram Leela's), but this one is just fantastic).
Still I think the settings of Udaipur fitted the story of OP best as it almost feels it couldn't have been shot anywhere else.
Interesting by the way you and @Beatless both mention very old films indeed. Did they utilise surroundings better in the first half of the century?
@BeatlesSansEarmuffs sounds like a scary monster indeed (Dr. No (novel) times ten?).
But was the bridge better utilised there then in AVTAK? I think the combination of the hight, the way the bridge is built and the blimp make it very special.
Another example: Palmyra in TB is amazing. It all works perfectly. The location, the shark tanks.
On the other hand, in CR The Ocean Club could be almost any beachfront hotel. Not that special at all to my mind, even though it still looked cool.
Cool.
I simply am pulled in too many directions in life now. I'm more than happy for other Originals to chime in any time, with any topic. This thead has been a haven for older, long time fans (due to SirHenry) and is well worth reading older posts (including all the fantastic reviews we did).
For me, DAF was my first film, seen in the theatre. You got there before me, Birdleson. But I dove into the novels at the same time and immersed myself fully into that superb world of Bond that I discovered.
We had a new Bond film approximately every 2 years for awhile. We had promos about it that seem to truly minuscule compared to now. I was always excited to see a trailer because that was pretty much all we got, plus a few articles here and there. But Bond influence was everywhere in TV and other films when I was a child and teen. My 20's were with Roger, and I enjoyed his Bond very much indeed. By then I was so into Fleming I could criticize things here and there - but still loving the series.
The eagerness, the NOT knowing what was coming up, the sheer build up of anticipation for the next Bond adventure was a pattern that I thrilled to. Yes, I appreciate having more information so readily available via the internet these days. I do. But I try to use that judiciously ... because I don't want to lose the steady pace of anticipation, and even more importantly the ability to sit down in that darkened theatre and wait for the opening scene, gun barrel or no, to Bond. James Bond. My Bond that has been part of my life for so long.
I'm off many threads now but still stick with the forum, if I can without being spoiled for Bond 25, till about 3 months before its release. Worked for Skyfall and Spectre. I was able to view them without knowing what was coming up, not even knowing what would next explode (!), so I shall do my best to keep that for me. It's quite worth it. B-)
I would like to hear from Originals (well, and everybody else, too) on how they are keeping spoilers away from themselves regarding Bond 25. Or not, if they prefer to be spoiled. ;) I really am trying to keep news to a minimum for myself as I want the experience again of seeing the next Bond film unfold before my eyes in the theatre without knowing much at all ahead of time.
So ... please chime in, everyone. B-) What are your plans to keep Bond 25 fresh and unspoiled for you?
Personally, I hope to not leave the forum until 2 or 3 months ahead of time (which worked for me before). But I need to stay off threads related to Bond 25. I don't mind knowing actors confirmed, or locations filmed (which can be in the Production thread title) but knowing what type of scene is being filmed is something I definitely want to avoid, for an example. When I see a location in the film, for example if it suddenly shows Canada (just an example, I don't expect Canada in Bond 25) ... I do NOT want to be connecting, even momentarily in my mind, 'Oh that's where such and such will happen'. I really want the story to unfold fresh for me.
We can do it, but it takes constant vigilance (which always reminds me of Harry Potter; I loved all those books).
And that's exactly the problem and why I try to learn as less as possible. You're already influenced by the little titbits that came out. In the end it shouldn't make a difference if the story continues, as long as we get a good film.
All I'm hoping for is a consitent film that's at least a bit intelligent and has some proper thrills in it. QoS still is my favorite of this era exactly because of that. Sadly, it has a few glaring holes made all the bigger by the shortness of the film. Still, it's more a Bond-story than SP if you ask me.
Glad to see you've come around, old chum! ;)