› ›

Indiana Jones

1…7172747677…199

Comments

  • TR007TR007
    Posts: 1,165
    It’s been said recently that along with info on Mads’ character that the plot is based around Operation Paperclip, which places this movie in the 60’s.
  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,493
    TR007 wrote: »
    It’s been said recently that along with info on Mads’ character that the plot is based around Operation Paperclip, which places this movie in the 60’s.

    Absolutely, I think we will see
    a WW2 opening (as per the images we have seen so far in the media) which is set near the end of the war and shows the German rocket research and then the film jumps to 15 or years later, early sixties and, as you say, Operation Paperclip. I think it's great to pay-off the Nazi threat and their agenda from Raiders.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    MakeshiftPython wrote: »
    SPECIFICALLY regarding Indy 5 or just the “my films are set in the 60s” comment?

    It would be quite odd to say ‘all of the films I’m working on’ when he meant ‘all of them except the next and biggest one I’m doing’ though, wouldn’t it?

    Scaramanga1974 wrote: »
    I've a feeling we might still see some of the rumoured plot from an earlier script involving stolen Nazi gold looking at the pictures of the train and Toby Jones holding what looks like a gold ingot.

    Doesn’t seem to be an ingot to me: it looks to be hexagonal. Presumably it’s some artefact key to the plot.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,217
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    TR007 wrote: »
    It’s been said recently that along with info on Mads’ character that the plot is based around Operation Paperclip, which places this movie in the 60’s.

    Absolutely, I think we will see
    a WW2 opening (as per the images we have seen so far in the media) which is set near the end of the war and shows the German rocket research and then the film jumps to 15 or years later, early sixties and, as you say, Operation Paperclip. I think it's great to pay-off the Nazi threat and their agenda from Raiders.

    Sounds about right to me, too.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,217
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    TR007 wrote: »
    It’s been said recently that along with info on Mads’ character that the plot is based around Operation Paperclip, which places this movie in the 60’s.

    Absolutely, I think we will see
    a WW2 opening (as per the images we have seen so far in the media) which is set near the end of the war and shows the German rocket research and then the film jumps to 15 or years later, early sixties and, as you say, Operation Paperclip. I think it's great to pay-off the Nazi threat and their agenda from Raiders.

    Sounds about right to me, too.

    I agree as well and can’t wait to see what the archeological element is.

  • Matt007Matt007
    Posts: 1,314
    I like the idea of something the nazis hid at the end of the war like those looted gold trains but what would be the supernatural element.

  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    Spielberg said it would be in the 60s in a 2018 Empire podcast:
  • DoctorNoDoctorNo USA-Maryland
    Posts: 755
    I haven’t read spoilers on this thread, but I did watch great YouTube show with three guys in industry discussing Raiders 40th anniversary and all things Indiana Jones… and they did mention something on the train from photos taken on set of Indy 5(half way through, it’s long)

  • mattjoesmattjoes Julie T. and the M.G.'s
    Posts: 7,021
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Indeed, some of the deep fake stuff is remarkable.


    Yeah it’s a little strange that studios would be oblivious to these deep fake versions and not think they can do better than what they have with CGI

    Another great one is visual FX artists using open source software to "fix" dodgy stop motion in older films.

    I love the ED 209 stop motion jerkiness. It makes it seem really threatening.

    Back to Indy, I'm very excited about the new film. What we know about the story and the cast sounds really good.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,586
    mattjoes wrote: »
    I love the ED 209 stop motion jerkiness. It makes it seem really threatening.
    He just had clunky stepper motors.
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    I am sick to death of people looking at classic movie characters whether male or female? And saying their is something sinister about them. Makes me so bloody angry!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    I am sick to death of people looking at classic movie characters whether male or female? And saying their is something sinister about them. Makes me so bloody angry!

    Not sure where that came from! :D If you're referring to Marion being underage when her and Indy were first together... well that's always sounded dodgy- it's nothing new! I've always personally just ignored that, I have no idea why they included that in the film.

    Anyway, interesting thing from Mangold today:


    So it sounds like they weren't developing the Koepp script: they abandoned it and started afresh.
  • DoctorNoDoctorNo USA-Maryland
    Posts: 755
    Wow... Mangold is taking it to people on Twitter. This should be interesting... good for him though. Why should he have to eat *($# for a year making this... give the man a chance.
  • ZekidkZekidk
    Posts: 3,276
    846a1bfd-5589-44e1-bddb-d4de5b428362.jpg
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    Cool shot.
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    Wow... Mangold is taking it to people on Twitter. This should be interesting... good for him though. Why should he have to eat *($# for a year making this... give the man a chance.

    Yes, I liked his explanation for responding:

  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,217
    Zekidk wrote: »
    846a1bfd-5589-44e1-bddb-d4de5b428362.jpg

    This film is going to look great.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Zekidk wrote: »
    846a1bfd-5589-44e1-bddb-d4de5b428362.jpg

    But do we know for sure that this is for the film? Could be the film crew are all nazis.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,970
    I hope we don't get too many set pics.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    Good point. The whole film could be an elaborate cover for the re-emergence of the Reich. And they've chosen to start their campaign in Northumberland.
  • Mr_BeachMr_Beach
    Posts: 121
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    Wow... Mangold is taking it to people on Twitter. This should be interesting... good for him though. Why should he have to eat *($# for a year making this... give the man a chance.

    I don't undertand why he is wasting his time reading the opinions of some idiots on twitter and replying to them. If I was directing Indy 5 I wouldn't give a damn about what a random neckbeard thought about my movie that wasn't even finished yet.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    Mr_Beach wrote: »
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    Wow... Mangold is taking it to people on Twitter. This should be interesting... good for him though. Why should he have to eat *($# for a year making this... give the man a chance.

    I don't undertand why he is wasting his time reading the opinions of some idiots on twitter and replying to them. If I was directing Indy 5 I wouldn't give a damn about what a random neckbeard thought about my movie that wasn't even finished yet.

    Well as he said, he doesn't mind people griping but them saying things which are just false (like who has written the script) should be corrected. The ageism stuff is also a bit tired too.

    Look at this stunning Raiders poster which the amazing Tony Stella shared yesterday:

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    That is really excellent.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,637
    Mr_Beach wrote: »
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    Wow... Mangold is taking it to people on Twitter. This should be interesting... good for him though. Why should he have to eat *($# for a year making this... give the man a chance.

    I don't undertand why he is wasting his time reading the opinions of some idiots on twitter and replying to them. If I was directing Indy 5 I wouldn't give a damn about what a random neckbeard thought about my movie that wasn't even finished yet.

    It proves in a way that he cares about his fans. Vin Diesel asks what the fans want in the next F & F movies and they often end up in the movies. And are often liked. Lucasfilm, EON, DC and even Marvel Studios could do this once in a while. Instead of listening to Kathleen Kennedy, Neal Purvis and Robert Wade, Barbara Broccoli, Zack Snyder, Ray Fisher, and Kevin Feige. Sometimes, even the fans can be right.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    Kathleen Kennedy has made all of the previous Indiana Jones movies and those are often liked.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    edited June 2021 Posts: 4,637
    mtm wrote: »
    Kathleen Kennedy has made all of the previous Indiana Jones movies and those are often liked.

    She didn’t have the power she does now. JJ Abrams was no help, either. Believe it or not, I liked his Star Wars movies.
  • DoctorNoDoctorNo USA-Maryland
    Posts: 755
    Mr_Beach wrote: »
    I don't undertand why he is wasting his time reading the opinions of some idiots on twitter and replying to them. If I was directing Indy 5 I wouldn't give a damn about what a random neckbeard thought about my movie that wasn't even finished yet.

    Yeah, there will be no end to negativity on twitter, so it's both pointless and at that same time you do want to defend your lead, correct errors, and not be sheepish. The most important thing is that he channels his anger into making a great movie to prove these people wrong.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,423
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Kathleen Kennedy has made all of the previous Indiana Jones movies and those are often liked.

    She didn’t have the power she does now.

    Associate/executive producer isn't nothing.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,632
    Upon reflection, there WOULD be a negative aspect of Indy 5 and Black Adam coming out the same weekend ---- I'd like to see BOTH at an IMAX theater !
  • Mr_BeachMr_Beach
    edited June 2021 Posts: 121
    It's hours later and James Mangold is still replying to miserable people on twitter with a few dozen followers. I like him, but I wish someone close to him would tell him to stop paying attention to what a couple of people on twitter say.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    edited June 2021 Posts: 8,188
    mtm wrote: »
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    I am sick to death of people looking at classic movie characters whether male or female? And saying their is something sinister about them. Makes me so bloody angry!

    Not sure where that came from! :D If you're referring to Marion being underage when her and Indy were first together... well that's always sounded dodgy- it's nothing new! I've always personally just ignored that, I have no idea why they included that in the film.

    I think it was to give Indy a dark streak, to show he wasn’t exactly a totally good guy. Sort of like Bond, though we’ve never heard of him going after jail bait.

    In recorded discussions between the filmmakers, Marion would have originally been 12 years old and Indy was of college age. Ewwww.
Sign In or Register to comment.