It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
EDIT
Yes, 2001. Thought so.
Haha. It suits him actually. Statham can get away with a lot as Bond in my book, including a five o'clock shadow.
[/quote]Haha. It suits him actually. Statham can get away with a lot as Bond in my book, including a five o'clock shadow. [/quote]
I admire your viewpoint, sir. :D
Sweet. Statham looking more suave than Craig Bond in recent outings.
Oh cmon! Please! Really?
And you call yourself a Bond fan... ;)
Lovely pictures
I'm a huge Bond fan too.
I think its lovely, and well fitted.
Playing dress up...Cmon, methinks the fan doth protest too much.
They've been harking back to classic 60s fashion. The fitting is wrong, most of the time, we've discussed that endlessly. But that's about it.
The suits were brilliant in Skyfall, apart from the fitting.
I'm growing tired of Bond fans complaining about every little thing. Bet Craig&co feel the same.
Let me get something out of my chest, please. The forums are crawling with M:I and DC and Marvel threads, and now F&TF. Honestly, I can't fathom how on earth do you guys like this stuff, but hey, that's just me. I'm not saying that Bond is another thing, and better - wait, but I am, after all this is a Bond forum. Thing is, if you do like your Stathams and Jonhsons, Afflecks and Momoas better, by all means, keep bashing Bond about. Cause you are right, it's not the same thing, not by a mile. Comparing a romantic character like a British officer out from the cold war to tattooed muscled tugs with rigged v12 cars with stickers on the sides, and superhero out of children books and cartoons. Please! Oh shit, this happened to me in the Marvel thread. I'm doing it again, aren't I. Damn it. So sorry fellas. Wrong thread for me. Do keep your love for Nitro on, I'll go sip on a martini, before I jump in the Jag and go for a spin. Silly elitist me. Never mind old Univex. Gonna stop by the Bond25 thread to see if the squirrels are back to their shenanigans. Cheerio.
Brosnan too, I'm sure. ;)
In terms of complaining about everything, that's an exaggeration in my opinion. If you want to discuss cinematography in the first three Craig films, or casting choices, or score then I'm sure you'l get some agreement. Bring up suits post-QoS as a point of conversation to justify why Bond is great and you should expect some pushback, and rightly so.
---
@Univex, I disagree with you my friend, and I've already explained why. Fit is sacrosanct in my opinion, and different from fashion, which can, and does, change with the times. The comparison isn't the same and justifying Craig's suits in the last few films on the basis that they evoke Connery at his finest is just something I can't go for. Sorry. ;)
Anyway, we're here for FF, and that trailer is the business! As expected, Elba and Kirby are the highlights for me.
Ah damn. I'm disappointed but not surprised. I was hoping for something more akin to FAST FIVE rather than FATE OF THE FURIOUS.
It looks like fun, but as a spin-off it had potential to be legitimately good as opposed to just being entertaining garbage. A shame.
I'd rate the very best one that I've seen a 4 out of 10 score.
What is the appeal to anyone older than a high school freshman?
Out of curiosity, are you kidding or serious?