It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The Basil Rathbone Sherlock films go way past the single digits and I think finish at 14 in total, so F&F have a long way to go to just beat them.
You can't really compare the production times of films far into the past to now. They are so different it is incomparable.
On a course of one week I have been watching all 5 Furious-movies. And actually, while I'm writing thing I paused 'Fast & Furious 6'. Simply because I was dying to post something about this franchise now.
I am honest here. I think the first three films are mediocre at most. Too much illegal streetcar racing without any clear mission. But I think ever since 'Fast & Furious', the 4th film, the writer Chris Morgan and the producers did a very wise thing: Turning the franchise into a well-nuanced concoction of 'Ocean's Eleven' and 'James Bond', but still with the 'streetracy' roughness and humour attached to it =D>.
And by jolly it works. I even think the team has this real, family-esque team spirit that makes you feel good. And Roman? Haha, I just heard him saying: "Dammit, we're not a frikkin' 007!". He makes me laugh all the time. Anddd, I saw a small cameo of Bond's Aston Martin DB5 :-P.
I am not surprised that the worldwide gross for 'Furious 6' currently stands at a whopping $771,152,190. Yup, Universal found the right balance with the Furious-franchise. And they struck gold with it.
--> footchase in the London Underground ('Skyfall')
--> A villain, Shaw, that is an ex-SAS/MI6 agent ('Skyfall')
--> An Aston Martin DB5 cameo ('Skyfall')
--> Toretto and Hobbs using almost the same radio transmitter/tracker that 'Q' gave to 007 ('Skyfall')
--> Tej slowly turning into the 'Q' of the franchise, mostly doing all the computer stuff......also in a place that is reminiscent of Churchill's bunker/MI6 ('Skyfall')
--> Aerial shots of London that are soooo reminiscent of Roger Deakins ('Skyfall')
--> Roman actually talking about 007 ('James Bond')
--> A fantastic car chase featuring a tank ('GoldenEye')
--> A car chase vs. Tupolev airplane ('Die Another Day'/'Casino Royale'/'The Living Daylights')
--> The villain 'Shaw' driving an Aston Martin DBS ('Casino Royale'/'Quantum Of Solace')
--> A carchase in the city of London with specially designed shovel cars ('The Dark Knight')
--> Some dramatic scenes with a necklace ('Casino Royale')
--> Connor fighting in the LA prison ('Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol')
Actually, I think it's a big compliment for 'Skyfall' and many other Bond films that 'Fast & Furious 6' used a lot of inspiration from these Bond films ;-).
So I finished all 6 Furious-films now. And this would be my TOP 6 of all of them:
01) 7.5/10: 'Fast & Furious 5' (2011)
02) 7.5/10: 'Fast & Furious 6' (2013)
03) 7.0/10: 'Fast & Furious' (2009)
04) 6.0/10: 'The Fast And The Furious' (2001)
05) 5.5/10: '2 Fast 2 Furious' (2003)
06) 3.5/10: 'The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift' (2006)
Can't wait for 'Furious 7', in which Jason Statham plays Ian Shaw, the brother of Shaw, played by Luke Evans.
--> footchase in the London Underground ('Skyfall')
--> A villain, Shaw, that is an ex-SAS/MI6 agent ('Skyfall')
--> An Aston Martin DB5 cameo ('Skyfall')
--> Toretto and Hobbs using almost the same radio transmitter/tracker that 'Q' gave to 007 ('Skyfall')
--> Tej slowly turning into the 'Q' of the franchise, mostly doing all the computer stuff......also in a place that is reminiscent of Churchill's bunker/MI6 ('Skyfall')
--> Aerial shots of London that are soooo reminiscent of Roger Deakins ('Skyfall')
--> Roman actually talking about 007 ('James Bond')
--> A fantastic car chase featuring a tank ('GoldenEye')
--> A car chase vs. Tupolev airplane ('Die Another Day'/'Casino Royale'/'The Living Daylights')
--> The villain 'Shaw' driving an Aston Martin DBS ('Casino Royale'/'Quantum Of Solace')
--> A carchase in the city of London with specially designed shovel cars ('The Dark Knight')
--> Some dramatic scenes with a necklace ('Casino Royale')
--> Connor fighting in the LA prison ('Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol')
Actually, I think it's a big compliment for 'Skyfall' and many other Bond films that 'Fast & Furious 6' used a lot of inspiration from these Bond films ;-).
So I finished all 6 Furious-films now. And this would be my TOP 6 of all of them:
01) 7.5/10: 'Fast & Furious 5' (2011)
02) 7.5/10: 'Fast & Furious 6' (2013)
03) 7.0/10: 'Fast & Furious' (2009)
04) 6.0/10: 'The Fast And The Furious' (2001)
05) 5.5/10: '2 Fast 2 Furious' (2003)
06) 3.5/10: 'The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift' (2006)
Can't wait for 'Furious 7', in which Jason Statham plays Ian Shaw, the brother of Shaw, played by Luke Evans.
They didn't copy anything. I don't think most of your list holds much merit. I mean really
The SAS is nothing like MI6.
Well.....maybe 'copying' is a big word. But the last 'Fast & Furious' film was at least inspired by 'Skyfall' and some other Bond films :-). I see that as a compliment. Just like Christopher Nolan got inspired by James Bond in his film 'Inception'.
There's nothing wrong with that.....
You do realise that Fast & Furious 6 commenced filming 3 months before SF was even released. Anything that appears in the film would surely be coincidental as opposed to copied.
Lee Tamahori direct the second triple X, whyle Rob Cohen directer of the first movie direct the first triple X. And the first triple X already film in Chech, CR too.
I only have seen the second and bit of the first one. I only watched the second because David Arnold did the music (2 fast 2 furious and DAD both movies offcial be credit for 2002.) and atleast it has story/les action. Mabey i whant see the fift one because of Brazil.
It be sad the idea of Egypt is canceld. Locations of Egypt there whant to use i sugest it 1-2 years a go for a Bond movie in the hope to get some LALD, Octopussy/TLD style movie.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/paul-walker-fast-furious-7-664815
In other news, I think my girlfriend might get me the sixth film on steelbook blu-ray for Christmas. I'm excited, it was one excellent movie.
They'll just announce a new one when the time is right. Everyone knows it can't be ready for 11th July.
doubtful.... Lucas Black, who is reprising his role as Sean Boswell from Tokyo Drift in this new one, has signed on for 2 more films after Fast 7..
if they can somehow start filming again by january or february - they might be able to push the release back to either October or November.. but it depends on what that schedule looks like also.
Are you kidding? Compassion in Hollywood only extends so far. Universal are a business and right now Fast & Furious is a very profitable franchise. No way are they going to stop milking that cash cow.
out of respect for Paul they should keep going.. I don't think he would want the series to stop because of him - he never struck me as that kind of person..
in Universal's case, the Fast franchise has become one of their tent poles - i highly doubt they're going to pull the plug on it after Fast 7.
ah, what i affectionately call the Ledger Effect.... TDK was already going to make boat loads of cash, but Ledger's tragic passing boosted those numbers into the stratosphere... the same will probably happen with Fast 7.... Fast 7 was already probably going to make a huge amount of money, considering that each film has outgrossed it's predecessor thus far..
If the story is being changed, which is now likely, they'll have to lose some of them. Working with what they have will only go so far, as only half of Walker's walk and the current film, is complete. It may also mean $150 million all in, down the drain, so this could be one expensive film by the time we see it.
Three did not outgross two.
i know, i was just lazy and didn't want put it up lol... i was more or less inferring that the past couple ones have outgrossed their predecessors...