Last Movie you Watched?

1592593595597598989

Comments

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    chrisisall wrote: »
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Allow me to recommend Demolition Man, Assassins and Cop Land.
    ALL GOOD!
    Absolutely! All favourites of mine.

    I just purchased the Stallone Collection boxset which has both Assassins (Banderas is on fire here) and Demolition Man (Snipes goes all out) along with Tango & Cash and Cobra. I'll be getting to them all soon.
    ---

    @mattjoes, I agree that the film peters out a bit towards the end. Shame, but still highly enjoyable.

    If you haven't heard it, I recommend the Zulu Double CD soundtrack. It features some of Barry's best work, including The Specialist 'suite', played by The City of Prague Philharmonic. There's also a suite from The Cotton Club and The Tamarind Seed. They really do Barry justice.

    There were two soundtrack CDs issued for the film. I have 'Music from the film' CD which has many of the great songs featured in the movie but don't yet have 'Score' CD which has Barry's work.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,838
    bondjames wrote: »
    Tango & Cash and Cobra.
    The former was workable fun nonsense, the latter was comic book level drek (but it had a great score!). Cobra was during Stallone's tryst with Bridgett when he kind of lost his mind there for a bit... ;)

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    chrisisall wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Tango & Cash and Cobra.
    The former was workable fun nonsense, the latter was comic book level drek (but it had a great score!). Cobra was during Stallone's tryst with Bridgett when he kind of lost his mind there for a bit... ;)
    I actually haven't seen these two flicks so am looking forward to it, but will temper expectations accordingly. Cobra seems pretty cheesy from the online trailers I've seen.
  • Posts: 12,529
    Just finished my fourth (I think) watch of Citizen Kane (1941). Definitely one of my favorite movies; just a wonderful story. Well-written, well-acted, well-shot, etc.; it's beloved for a reason!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    edited November 2017 Posts: 45,489
    DRACULA (2006)

    Pretty weak and unnecessary BBC adaptation. A few good scenes, but I was mostly bored.


    Dan Stevens is overacting like I have seldom seen before.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited November 2017 Posts: 17,838
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.
  • Posts: 16,227
    DRACULA (2006)

    Pretty weak and unnecessary BBC adaptation. A few good scenes, but I was mostly bored.


    Dan Stevens is overacting like I have seldom seen before.

    I felt there was something missing in Marc Warren's look as the Count. Granted there have been dozens and dozens of variations of Dracula actors with different looks, but Marc Warren's version seems more suitable to play Renfield, IMO.
    Denholm Elliot looked a more creepy and appropriate Count, as did Lugosi, Lee, Langella, Palance, Jourdan etc. I thought Louis Jourdan, who always looked like Louis Jourdan, nevertheless had character appropriate costuming that made him a convincing Dracula. Dracula's clothes in the novel aren't described in much detail except he wore all black and his cloak spread like bats wings as he descended the castle wall. His face is described vividly.
    Still, the 2006 BBC version was probably one of my least favorite adaptations.

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Lugosi, Lee, Palance and Oldman are a head or four above the rest imo.
  • Posts: 17,829
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
  • Posts: 16,227
    Lugosi, Lee, Palance and Oldman are a head or four above the rest imo.

    Yes. I thought those four had great looks as Dracula. I liked that Oldman had the long mustache when in his younger guise.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Pay more attention to your chef
    edited November 2017 Posts: 7,060
    bondjames wrote: »
    If you haven't heard it, I recommend the Zulu Double CD soundtrack. It features some of Barry's best work, including The Specialist 'suite', played by The City of Prague Philharmonic. There's also a suite from The Cotton Club and The Tamarind Seed. They really do Barry justice.
    @bondjames I haven't heard it. I'll check it out.

    bondjames wrote: »
    There were two soundtrack CDs issued for the film. I have 'Music from the film' CD which has many of the great songs featured in the movie but don't yet have 'Score' CD which has Barry's work.
    Yeah, though "Music from the film" has two suites Barry recorded with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, I believe. In the one featuring Did You Call Me, the sax player really nails it. The score album doesn't include these tracks. I haven't paid much attention to the songs in the film, mostly because I haven't watched the film too much and I've listened to the score on its own, but I definitely feel like checking out the songs now.

    bondjames wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Tango & Cash and Cobra.
    The former was workable fun nonsense, the latter was comic book level drek (but it had a great score!). Cobra was during Stallone's tryst with Bridgett when he kind of lost his mind there for a bit... ;)
    I actually haven't seen these two flicks so am looking forward to it, but will temper expectations accordingly. Cobra seems pretty cheesy from the online trailers I've seen.
    Tango & Cash is cheesy fun. Cobra is cheesy, but not much fun.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 14,016
    Lugosi, Lee, Palance and Oldman are a head or four above the rest imo.

    Lugosi, Palance, Kinski & Lee are my top 4. The rest (Oldman, Warren, Billington, Butler & Jourdan to name a few) I don't care for
  • Posts: 17,829
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.

    Interesting! Another reason to push Topaz further up on the list. Gavin was actually signed on for DAF too, wasn't he?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.

    Interesting! Another reason to push Topaz further up on the list. Gavin was actually signed on for DAF too, wasn't he?
    Yep! He's the one who almost became Bond. :)
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,838
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.

    Interesting! Another reason to push Topaz further up on the list. Gavin was actually signed on for DAF too, wasn't he?
    Yep! He's the one who almost became Bond. :)

    I keep forgetting that!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    chrisisall wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.

    Interesting! Another reason to push Topaz further up on the list. Gavin was actually signed on for DAF too, wasn't he?
    Yep! He's the one who almost became Bond. :)
    I keep forgetting that!
    I think John Gavin is alright. But, he never had the Bond look to begin with. And I'm certainly glad the franchise has not been Americanized.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 25,460
    chrisisall wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.

    Interesting! Another reason to push Topaz further up on the list. Gavin was actually signed on for DAF too, wasn't he?
    Yep! He's the one who almost became Bond. :)
    I keep forgetting that!
    I think John Gavin is alright. But, he never had the Bond look to begin with. And I'm certainly glad the franchise has not been Americanized.

    Gavin did what he was required of him in Psycho though I always thought he was a bit bland as an actor.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    chrisisall wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Topaz (1969).

    topaz2.jpg

    I'd actually not seen this movie before, but for what it was, it wasn't bad at all. Definitely not Hitchcocks best, but even Hitchcock on autopilot is still Hitchcock. However, some of the stuff in Cuba moved a little slowly for me.
    Could smell the Bond influence all over this one, and I'm not just referring to Karin Dor... I read that the lead was offered to Connery, and that would have been REALLY strange to watch. Still, this is as close to a Bond movie as Hitchcock would ever make, I guess- just heavy on realism and light on action. Repeat viewing factor fairly low though.
    Recommended.

    This one has been on my 'to watch-list' for close to 10 years. Will have to check it out at some point.
    Fun fact. Frederick Stafford bowed out of OSS 117: Double Agent (1968) to star in Topaz, just because Alfred Hitchcock saw him filming the previous OSS 117 film and liked his look. Stafford was replaced by John Gavin as OSS 117, of course. The same man who almost became Bond.

    Interesting! Another reason to push Topaz further up on the list. Gavin was actually signed on for DAF too, wasn't he?
    Yep! He's the one who almost became Bond. :)
    I keep forgetting that!
    I think John Gavin is alright. But, he never had the Bond look to begin with. And I'm certainly glad the franchise has not been Americanized.

    Gavin did what he was required of him in Psycho though I always thought he was a bit bland as an actor.
    Agreed. I also found him too bland.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,838
    I'll spoiler this thought on Topaz for those who haven't seen it yet...
    Devereaux's love for his Wife was tangible, and his feelings for his "other life agent-in-the-field" mistress was as well. It was truly a heartbreaking moment when he found out she died, and so complicated when his Wife admitted to being with his old friend (now adversary)... that they ended up together (in a way- possibly to be healed) was amazing, and felt so true to this crazy life... it gave the movie gravitas that so few of this kind have... I'm still recovering from this in a way.
    The next time I revisit this film it will affect me even more.
    Also, the alternate filmed endings were not very good. I'm so glad the movie ended with what they chose to go with.
  • Posts: 17,829
    Can't remember if I've actually have seen Gavin in anything. Will have to find that OSS 117 film he starred in.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,278
    I rather liked Gavin as Caesar in SPARTACUS.
  • Posts: 17,829

    Nice one! No Bond if you ask me, but interesting scenes. Take it that they're from the OSS 117-film he starred in?

    The fight clips reminded me how incredibly 60's the hotel fight scene from OSS 117: Cairo, Nest of Spies looked!

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Yep! The Dujardin films parodied the sixties EuroSpy films, the Connery Bonds as well as their very own OSS 117 films (which weren't parodies).
  • edited November 2017 Posts: 17,829
    Still waiting for a third Dujardin-OSS 117. The two with him as Hubert Bonisseur de La Bath, are brilliant!

    Need to watch those two films again soon...
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Haha, I watch them four or five times a year! :))
  • Posts: 17,829
    They are incredibly rewatchable!
  • Posts: 16,227

    YES!!! That was great! Loved it!
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I must check out these OSS 117 films. I've never heard of them before, nor have I seen Gavin in anything previously (I've yet to view Spartacus even though I own it on blu).
Sign In or Register to comment.