It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
@jake24 - That's a very good idea, but I'm not sure if it'd be fair to some of the earlier ones.
Battles I had meant as Bond an army versus the villain's army.
If we were to do climactic action scenes (which I would also vote in favour of) it would look like this:
DN - Fight with Dr. No
FRWL - Boat Chase
GF - Battle at Fort Knox
TB - Underwater Battle
YOLT - Volcano Battle
OHMSS - Battle at Piz Gloria
DAF - Oil Rig Battle
LALD - Fight with Kananga
TMWTGG - Duel with Scaramanga
TSWLM - Battle on the Liparus
MR - Space Lazer Battle
FYEO - Fight at St. Cyril's
OP - Plane Grappling
AVTAK - Fight on the Golden Gate Bridge
TLD - Fight with Necros
LTK - Tanker Chase
GE - Fight with 006
TND - Battle on the Stealth Ship
TWINE - Submarine Battle
DAD - Plane Battle
CR - Fight in the Venetian Building
QOS - Battle in the Eco Hotel
SF - Attack on Skyfall
SP - Rescue of Madeleine Swann
Either of those ideas look good to me.
It was? Battles, you mean?
:)
This is another great idea. I'd certainly enjoy this game. Think we need an updated list of all ideas put forward.
For example in the recent Bond film elimination game there was a call for points to be deducted by 50%.
I have maintained that this is not a fair system and we should just let the games play out. I don't see the urgency to finish these games. But so I'm not referred too as a dictator or such then let's have a vote on it
A. Deduct 50% from all scores when the remaining entries go over a certain point (ie 70 or more)
B. Keep the games as they are and make sure that no games begin with more than 30 points Preferably 20
B
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/10253/the-great-bond-film-finale-elimination-game/p1
I don't understand what's supposed to be insufficient with the current system. The games have been run very smoothly is my impression.
A. Deduct 50% from all scores when the remaining entries go over a certain point (ie 70 or more)
B. Keep the games as they are and make sure that no games begin with more than 30 points Preferably 20
C. Keep the games as they are, start them at any point, and let them pan out without any reduction, no matter how long it takes.
I wont be adding any more alterations as I only want to enjoy the elimination games. They're supposed to be a fun add on to general Bondian discussion. Not a potential World War 3 catalyst with every vote scrutinised and reviewed because of what a member may have said in the past.
Depends on how many options there are. No deduction, please. We have been through that before.
Very good. We can certainly do it again though if people are in favour.
Definitely, but limited to 20 points.
That is true. But what is the benefit of giving more initial points? Even if you only have let's say 12 alternatives, it makes no sense to start with more than 20 initial points. We have seen it in the "Bond car elimination game" which went on way to long with only few participants in the end. 20 points is really enough. The most favourite choices will easily increase their maximum number of points to 50 during the game.
That HAS happened. I personally would not be interested but I'm sure lots would.