It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I did funnily enough...last night. Its good, but parts of it do drag and Glenn's direction still has a slightly bland feel.
Decent movie, but Skyfall is still better!
Note: Looking at his past reviews I was surprised to see that he waited until December 2913 to make a review of QoS (4*). I agree it's good but in no way better than SF and it did made me wonder even more about this guy...
Daylights is a firm mid-table entry for me.
the bloody nincompoop.
Interesting that he describes it as 'a fraught salvage job'. This is exactly how it felt to me - Mendes desperately trying to make the best of a pretty sketchy script and poor plotting. This is one reason I'm more optimistic about the next movie, as I think Logan and Mendes's involvement from day one should help ensure more consistency.
I agree with pretty much everything the article says regarding SF - particularly the nod to TLD, of course! ;)
I tend to agree with you. I must admit, that I was left somewhat deflated with my first viewing of Skyfall. I think that TLD is a much better release, and I would take it over SF anyday.
I personally enjoy SF the most out of the Bond series. TLD is of course also a great one, but they are both different and good in their own way.
I agree. Let's not forget why films are made.
I've always really enjoyed SF. Craig, Dench, Feinnes and Bardem give the film more gravitas and Mendes does keep a degree of suspense going. While I can see why some may say its overrated I think there's more strong stuff than weaker stuff onscreen.
As strong as some scenes are in TLD I can't help but find the story of SF more compelling overall. To be honest I find parts of TLD a bit...boring. I say PARTS.
And Bain, you do watch The Living Daylights a lot. Are you sure that you aren't a closet fan? ;)
Ow !!!!
Compared to GF it's not !!
I do like to dip in and out of Bond films, but I know without hesitation which film I "watch a lot" hehe.
GF is not overrated anymore; in case you haven't noticed tons of fans don't like it as much anymore.
And tons still do,looking at the film lists by members here,word of mouth, and on other sites.
Dont get me wrong,i love all the Bond films,its just Bond does Jack shit in the film for most of it.
With the exception of the DB5 chase and the golf match it should/could have been a lot better.
I've said this before, but again, Bond isn't even in prison for half the movie - and even when he is, he tries to do stuff. His accomplishments in GF include bombing that hideout in the PTS, beating Goldfinger in golf (and taking his girl), foiling Goldfinger's plans at Fort Knox (sure he didn't disable the bomb but if it wasn't for him then the rest wouldn't have known about it), and killing Oddjob (and indirectly Goldfinger). Not too shabby if you ask me.
Goldfinger succeeding? Obviously? And besides he's Bond; do you need further explanation of his mystic charm?
You can pose those "what if" moments against virtually every Bond film though.