It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I believe P2D was talking about who gets the "Story by" and "Screenplay by" credits
Plus with the whole dangerous new technologies angle, I doubt they'd kidnap a psychologist for that, unless the new technology is cloning and Malek wants his clones to go through therapy before they become fully dangerous? which is definitely not the case.
And yes while I know they could be kidnapping Madeleine to clone her, I think for them to mention the word scientist in the synopsis, and not Madeleine, speaks for itself, and before you mention spoilers... if Madeleine's kidnapping is the inciting incident for the rest of the story, you don't really need to keep it a secret, so I think the use of the word "scientist" means that it's a separate character.
And overall while sometimes they can be, I don't think these film's are ever that cryptic when it comes to synopsis'. I don't think any of us would've referred to Madeleine as a scientist before this synopsis came out, so I don't think they ever would.
Eon don't get final say. The WGA do.
Eon didn't plan on giving Jez Butterworth a credit for SP, but he got one from the WGA arbitration process. We all knew Butterworth did a polish on the SP script, but his name was left out of all marketing material until we got the final credits with the poster.
There have also been numerous incidents where writers have either maintained a credit where it was not deserved or lost a credit due to arbitration rules.
Check these out:
So whilst your logic holds up, sadly Eon don't get the final say when guilds and unions are involved.
20'ish- 60'ish: Southern Italy
60-120: Jamaica and Cuba
120-160: London
160-200: Scotland/Norway
I don't think Madeleine is getting kidnapped, either. But I also think it is possible that ther kidnapped scientist has nothing to do with the dangerous technology. It doesn't make much sense to kidnap a scentist so he/she can help you destroy the world. In most cases, you just pay them. ;-)
EON and CJF have done such a remarkable job of keeping the public guessing that trying to speculate on anything at this point is, well, pointless. But I am sticking to my guns: Madeleine has something or knows something that Spectre is terrified of. And for whatever reason they want her and anything else left of her life wiped out. That would include, presumably, a daughter-who lives in Norway with her father (Madeleine's ex), a scientist. That's how I am connecting the dots. I am certain I am wrong. LOL.
No, not really.
I have suggested all along that Matera is being used for two or more locations. The graveyard could be Greece, Croatia, France, wherever. Some of the surrounding countryside, too. After all, Nassau was also Madagascar.
Amen
Norway
Jamaica
Matera
Cuba
Norway (Scotland)
Fukunaga is 'doing a Nolan', and the film won't will play out in chronological order, meaning that Matera is the PTS, we'll return to Matera later in the film, but chronologically, the DB5 scene would fit just after the PTS, but that won't be its place in the film.
Myself and some members on here just created a new Facebook group called James Bond Will Return - The Official 007 Group.
Join if you're interested.
Yo @marketto007 !! I can help you out. Got loads of pics plus video clips (mostly from instagrammers). We can fix this tomorrow around lunchtime, just give me an email-adress.
Two notes:
1) Not much is revealed in terms of story
2) It is possibly the best-looking Bond film to date
That's quite a statement given the last 4 films have looked very good