It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Again, please, just leave it. This is a filming thread.
Oowh you know me Benny. I'm Dutch. I don't think in vertical terms with regard to authority. For me remarks, like I just made, should be made a bit more often. You can even find some truth in it yourself (if you try hehe). And...it keeps the moderator sharp 😏😉. Having said that, you are a good moderator,who actually is one of the more horizontally thinking moderators 👍🏼
Do you know the director personally?
I'm sure it probably will be linear: I'm not actually claiming it won't be! :)
That's funny isn't it: usually they strike these things immediately. They can't be done there.
Unless the photo was only posted yesterday and taken a while ago..?
No, but I have friends working with him right now who have highly rated his clarity and sure footed approach, and of course his previous productions speak for themselves in terms of his sharp, no-nonsense storytelling, even with True Detective, which did play with time, or Maniac which played with reality, there was still absolute clarity. And, for me, the clear way to tell the story is just how I've outlined in earlier posts.
Sure, but without knowing what the story is we can't really know the best way to tell it! :)
I really like that mask. Not practical but very cool.
Total idiots.
Maybe grow a pair or learn English.
There’s also a good 200 pages back full of info.
That’s confirmed to be maleks double.. Again he posted photos next to the Norway cabin.
Either way believe what you want.
I’ll just be laughing when it’s in the trailer!
But then we also had someone saying that the appeal for a young actress who looks like Seydoux was definitely for this film when in fact it wasn't certain if it was? I'm happy to see this instagram message but I'm not exactly convinced by this so far. It may well turn out to be true but I'm not '110%' convinced just yet.
I'll ignore this stuff..
Wow absolutely amazing. True dedication.
And then Rami Malek’s stunt man took photos in front of the cabin in the snow just to confuse everyone.
CJF is a master in confusing the fans. Insane!
This attitude sucks so hard, man.
No need for it whatsoever, especially if you are so confident in what you say. Better off just sitting back and letting the film prove you right.
And she says she's in it here, 'stunt doubling in one of the scenes' but still no mention of Young Swann...? Am I missing something or is my English worse than I thought? :)
She may well have put herself on IMDB (probably the most likely candidate) so it may well be true, but I'm not seeing the evidence that is claimed to be there.
I get my sources from those connected with pinewood and people who work on the film.
For example, a man who worked on game of thrones and the walking dead as a prosthetics artist is doing prosthetics for NTTD.
So that means that someone in this film requires prosthetics.
Blofeld or possibly Malek (the scar on his double).
It’s all about piecing together the puzzles.
What’s irritating is when this news came out 3 months ago and we have people going at everyone’s throats saying they are wrong.
There's only one person doing that... ;)
Where did you see this Insta message that she confirmed she was young Maddie? I'm totally open-minded on this; it may well be true.
I'm saying this, we know Norway is at the start, we know Matera is next, and it is highly likely these two sequences are set in the past (Norway earlier, Matera just after SP) and Jamaica is, as we also know, set in the present, and so what I am saying, very clearly, is the sequences/scenes follow a linear structure, because we already know that is the case in terms of the clapperboards and scenes numbers we have seen. So, without even having to know the story, it's not too difficult to figure out the direction this is going in. I'm sure u agree.
A friend of mine (runs several Facebook Bond pages), messaged her on Facebook.
I’ll bet money on it.
Nice, thanks for the information
Well, no; we don't know. We just know they follow each other in the film.
GoT's make-up wizard Barrie Gower working on NTTD is not a exactly secret. In the two hour GoT-special in may Barrie talked briefly about working on new Bond. Guessing EON even hired his wife as well since they work together as a team.
Your attitude has been awful at least since I’ve joined the boards. Calling people idiots should have you banned.
Hmm, okay. Your story is shifting around quite a bit (earlier she confirmed she was playing the girl on the lake, now it's definitely Madeleine) and conveniently no one else has seen this message, combine that with the insults and anger and odd tangent about 10k followers and I find it hard to take your word on that. The vibe I'm getting is 'unreliable'.
But sure, it may well turn out to be a flashback: I certainly wouldn't put money on it either way. I'll be interested to see how it works with Malek being there. To be honest for all we know it could be a dream sequence!
That's linear storytelling. And you have just agreed, "We just know they follow each other in the film." That is linear, even if Norway is not in the past (but I bet it is or else why the young Madeleine?), and Matera directly follows on with the DB5 as seen at the end of SP with Bond and Madeleine together, and then we jump to Jamaica and Bond alone, which we know is the present. Join the dots, my friend. It's not rocket science.
She’s quite reliable with this stuff. Known for having good sources.
Eh? I was saying 'no, we don't know for sure if those scenes are set in the past'; I'm not claiming they're out of order. I made an observation about OHMSS: I wasn't saying that had any relevance to this film at all. You seem to be determined to argue about this when I don't see there's anything to argue about: I agree that those scenes follow each other in roughly that order - I just said that.
As to whether they're set years previously or not we don't know. There is no concrete proof that there is a young Madeleine, and with what appears to be a young blonde girl seen on set with Seydoux and Lynch, and Malek present in this 'flashback', it doesn't look certain at all. Please don't try to patronise me with 'rocket science'.
I'm going to say the opening on the ice is a dream sequence. Look at how M.I Fallout opened. Prove me wrong :)
Calling people idiots after believing the grave Bond visits in Matera would've been Mrs. 6 minutes of screen-time Lucia's from SP puts a smile on my face.
Hopefully her "source" is not this forum. XD
She has good sources within the industry.
Let’s be respectful to all involved and make this forum fun and informative.