› ›

Indiana Jones

1…959698100101…199

Comments

  • mattjoesmattjoes Julie T. and the M.G.'s
    Posts: 7,021
    At any rate, the odds of that title being used are astronomically low. They just had to print something on that cap.

    MaxCasino wrote: »
    mattjoes wrote: »
    If that turns out to be the title, I will eat my shoe. I'll even film it, like Werner Herzog.

    Or Charlie Chaplin!
    Yes!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    A long shot, but this article thinks that this might be the film’s title.

    https://www.cbr.com/indiana-jones-5-filming-wraps/

    There's no way Marshall would 'announce' it that way if it were. Clickbait.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    IIRC there were ball caps that had “Indy IV” inscribed for the last film.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,970
    I wouldn't be too opposed to simply Indiana Jones just because this will probably be Ford's last film.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I wouldn't be too opposed to simply Indiana Jones just because this will probably be Ford's last film.

    I have considered your second clause and note the following: the first film had a title - Raiders of the Lost Ark - which did not include "Indiana Jones and the" so, if you want to come full circle, you could come up with a title...but not just his name. I get the idea that his name would be "the other missing portion" but, on balance, I think a title without his name would achieve it better. However, overall, I think it would serve better to have a title in the manner they've used since the first: Indiana Jones and the ...(something)...
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    It’s odd that Lucas decided to have Indy’s name on the title for the sequels. Would be like if Cubby insisted that after DR. NO they had to title each sequel with Bond’s name.

    And I see this with adaptations of books as well. The sequel to THE HUNGER GAMES being titled THE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE rather than the subtitle being the subtitle. It’s like studios don’t trust in audiences to follow sequels with unique names.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,804
    The Indy titles are in line with the old time serials they mine. Or the pulp novels of that prior time.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    Yeah I don’t think it’s like calling a Bond film ‘James Bond and Moonraker’: it’s an intentional pulpy throwback which suits these movies in a way it wouldn’t Bond.

    The original idea was that they would all be Raiders movies, so the next one would be called Raiders of the Temple of Doom and so on. I guess they felt Indy as a character had caught the imagination enough.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,217
    I'm glad it's all wrapped up, finally. I eagerly await the first trailer.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    No Frank, that's a hat.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,847
    Indy would be a lame title
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Indiana Jones and the Lame Title
  • DrunkIrishPoetDrunkIrishPoet The Amber Coast
    Posts: 156
    In the fall of 1981 I was a college freshman, rapping with new classmates about the coolest movies we’d seen lately, like Raiders of the Lost Ark. I predicted the sequel could only be Raiders of the Holy Grail, and I was basically right about that. But their reaction to my idea was, like, “The holy grail? You mean that crazy Monty Python thing?? Huh, that’s a weird idea for a mash-up, but… I like the way you think!” 🙄
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Well, you did see the use of a repeated term in the title ! "Mash-up" was a term in use in 1981 ? I remember that not. You were ahead of things...
  • DrunkIrishPoetDrunkIrishPoet The Amber Coast
    Posts: 156
    @Since62 you are correct that “mash-up” was not a term back then! Just telling the tale for the modern audience. You got a good ear for dialogue.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Thx. I see now what you meant.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Indiana and the Jones
  • AstonLotusAstonLotus
    Posts: 1,394
    Indiana Jones and the wokification of yet another franchise.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    A song for Marion to sing: Me-e-e a-and, Indy ! Indy Jones ! Indy Jones, Indy Jones, Indy Jooooones...we got a thiiiiing, goin' on...
  • RyanRyan Canada
    Posts: 692
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Kingdom of Doom
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    That'd be about the weakest and most uninspired title they could've come up with. Hopefully it's just a placeholder and we get something more fleshed out.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Ryan wrote: »
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Kingdom of Doom

    Either you passed comment by leaving out the 4th one - and quite fairly, if so - but your title might otherwise be restated as
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Crystal Kingdom of Doom

    Such that this one could be
    Indiana Jones and If You Thought We Did the Last One for Lucre Wait Until You See This One !
    I used "Lucre" because it's an ancient term, so, you know, all Indiana-ish.

    Quite the shame on the 4th one. Cate Blanchett ! She was fabulous ! The anthill...an awful way to go appropriately included in an Indy film ! Unfortunately, the race leading to the anthill displayed one of the faultier aspects of the film - CGI, and poorly done, at that.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Since62 wrote: »
    Ryan wrote: »
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Kingdom of Doom

    Either you passed comment by leaving out the 4th one - and quite fairly, if so - but your title might otherwise be restated as
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Crystal Kingdom of Doom

    Such that this one could be
    Indiana Jones and If You Thought We Did the Last One for Lucre Wait Until You See This One !
    I used "Lucre" because it's an ancient term, so, you know, all Indiana-ish.

    Quite the shame on the 4th one. Cate Blanchett ! She was fabulous ! The anthill...an awful way to go appropriately included in an Indy film ! Unfortunately, the race leading to the anthill displayed one of the faultier aspects of the film - CGI, and poorly done, at that.

    That entire chase sequence is the perfect encapsulation of why I loathe the film and tend to avoid it in my series marathons.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,413
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    Indiana Jones and the wokification of yet another franchise.

    There's a woman and a Chinese kid in the second one. And they save a load of Indians.
  • RyanRyan Canada
    Posts: 692
    Since62 wrote: »
    Ryan wrote: »
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Kingdom of Doom

    Either you passed comment by leaving out the 4th one - and quite fairly, if so - but your title might otherwise be restated as
    Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Crystal Kingdom of Doom

    Such that this one could be
    Indiana Jones and If You Thought We Did the Last One for Lucre Wait Until You See This One !
    I used "Lucre" because it's an ancient term, so, you know, all Indiana-ish.

    Quite the shame on the 4th one. Cate Blanchett ! She was fabulous ! The anthill...an awful way to go appropriately included in an Indy film ! Unfortunately, the race leading to the anthill displayed one of the faultier aspects of the film - CGI, and poorly done, at that.

    On second read it was actually The Last Crusade I missed in my faux title. I got the "Kingdom" in there for the fourth one. I actually can't believe I missed my favourite entry in the franchise!
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    Since62 wrote: »
    A song for Marion to sing: Me-e-e a-and, Indy ! Indy Jones ! Indy Jones, Indy Jones, Indy Jooooones...we got a thiiiiing, goin' on...

    “Indy! Indy! Raped me at fifteen! Raped me at fifteen. Ohhhh, raped me at fifteen!”
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Fifteen was it ? I thought older...ugh
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    That is: of the age of consent, and that there was mutual consent, and that it was not rape, but that she was younger than Indy, who was a graduate student at the time or just out of school...What were the writers and producers thinking ??? The point that Indy was older than her and more mature than her could have been made just as well by her being younger, yet of age
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,216
    I would have to go back and look, but within the film itself, not earlier scripts or preproduction material, is it absolutely confirmed that they had sex? If not then I see it as a crush that Indy allowed to go to far. A romantic relationship doesn’t necessarily mean a sexual relationship. Even without physical intimacy, a young Marion would have been devastated.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    Yes, but there's quite a difference between Indy breaking hearts and Indy committing statutory rape.
Sign In or Register to comment.