Where does Bond go after Craig?

1634635637639640683

Comments

  • Okay, if EON doesn't want to release the first movie of the next Bond era for another 3 years or so, then they should first quickly do a small, "Old Man Bond" movie starring Pierce Brosnan. I'm serious.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,638
    I don't blame Robert Carlyle for the material he was given in TWINE. I do find him a bit underrated as an actor. As I've said before, I'm biased towards TWINE, as it was my first Bond movie. However, I get people's frustrations with it. So many great ideas that are poorly portrayed, or underwritten. At the end of it though, TWINE arguably walked so SF could run.
  • Posts: 2,000
    @MaxCasino - TWINE arguably walked so SF could run. I have no idea what this means.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,821
    Well the Brosnan films tested the waters for concepts more fully realized in the Craig films.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    edited September 14 Posts: 4,638
    CrabKey wrote: »
    @MaxCasino - TWINE arguably walked so SF could run. I have no idea what this means.

    There were quite a few similarities between the two (for me anyway). TWINE came up short on a few of them. Quite a few of the unique ideas from TWINE get reused in SF (namely M and her villain connection, MI6 under attack). It feels like EON learned their lessons from TWINE when they decided to make SF. Mostly in themes and ideas.
    Well the Brosnan films tested the waters for concepts more fully realized in the Craig films.

    Yes, thank you @RichardTheBruce that was my point.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,139
    I've mentioned his name before, though he has been getting considerable buzz since Rebel Ridge debuted on Netflix. Therefore, I think now is a good time to remind people that the answer to this thread's question, 'Where does Bond go after Craig?', is Aaron Pierre.

    5fd8cb70-6c33-11ef-877f-412126f94be2_1200_630.jpeg

    I can’t comment on Aaron Pierre as I don’t know his work. Looks wise it’s not implausible to see him as Bond. He has a certain look about him.

    Good to see you posting @Pierce2Daniel 😊
  • Posts: 7,507
    Okay, if EON doesn't want to release the first movie of the next Bond era for another 3 years or so, then they should first quickly do a small, "Old Man Bond" movie starring Pierce Brosnan. I'm serious.

    No thanks!
  • Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,188
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    Posts: 3,789
    peter wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.

    Die Another Day comes to mind.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.

    Die Another Day comes to mind.

    Can you explain? Are you saying DAD is a Gen Z film? If so, how?

    DAD is a film with some strong ideas and was executed with many flaws, but what in it is Gen Z?
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    edited September 14 Posts: 3,789
    peter wrote: »
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.

    Die Another Day comes to mind.

    Can you explain? Are you saying DAD is a Gen Z film? If so, how?

    DAD is a film with some strong ideas and was executed with many flaws, but what in it is Gen Z?

    Just my personal observation, but Bond drinking Mojito, kiteboarding, some of his lines felt like he's trying to be youngster (but again, none of the lines in the film were good 😅), the use of lasers, and his cuban beach attire, Pierce was trying to be a youngster/boyish kind of thing in this film.

    Gen Z were the ones who were born from late 1990s to 2010s and DAD is under that era.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,592
    As long as we don't see Bond vaping and playing Call of Duty
  • peterpeter Toronto
    edited September 14 Posts: 9,509
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.

    Die Another Day comes to mind.

    Can you explain? Are you saying DAD is a Gen Z film? If so, how?

    DAD is a film with some strong ideas and was executed with many flaws, but what in it is Gen Z?

    Just my personal observation, but Bond drinking Mojito, kiteboarding, some of his lines felt like he's trying to be youngster (but again, none of the lines in the film were good 😅), the use of lasers, and his cuban beach attire, Pierce was trying to be a youngster/boyish kind of thing in this film.

    Gen Z were the ones who were born from late 1990s to 2010s and DAD is under that era.

    Call me slow, but I’m still not understanding what you’re saying?
    Mojito is a rum drink that some say was invented in the era of Pirates, others say it was African slaves in Cuba. But it’s a drink that’s hundreds of years old. Do Gen Z’ers only drink this cocktail?

    Is being a Gen Z’er trying to look young/boyish? And isn’t Brosnan’s clothing based on his environment anyways? Like Connery wearing his pink sleeveless shirt and shorts and sand shoes in Thunderball?

    Kiteboarding or parasailing is something I first saw in the 80s when I was a kid when my dad did it in Marco Island!

    And the use of lasers? Goldfinger first did it in 1964, so how are lasers a Gen Z thing? I’m being serious in I’m not understanding how any of your examples are distinctly Gen Z (or how Skyfall doesn’t have anything Gen Z in it?)??
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,306
    peter wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.

    Bond #7 can send a TikTok to M. This needs to happen.
  • Posts: 2,000
    Bond is a character at home in any time without necessarily being of that time. He doesn't need to do anything that panders to whatever characterizes the current generation. There's nothing unique about Bond using current technology. He's always done that. Connery used the dial phone, Craig the smartphone.

    A young, stylish Bond won't need to vape and play video games. What makes him unique is he's above all that. If things like that are what will be expected of Bond 26, then we'll see him at dinner with the Bond girl, both of whom are ignoring each other because they'll be looking at their phones.
  • edited September 15 Posts: 1,860
    @CrabKey The scary thing is that some younger fans would not bat an eye over a scene like that.

    Speaking of possible Bond actors, I just recalled something about being a BIG fan of "The Equalizer" TV series, which was originally created as a star vehicle for George Lazenby before it was offered to Woodward by the Network. From what I read in the reviews, the movie version was received well, but the casting of Denzel was too outside model for me and I never saw either one or the Queen Latifha version. Looked like it lost it's very British roots to main character.
  • SIS_HQSIS_HQ At the Vauxhall Headquarters
    Posts: 3,789
    delfloria wrote: »
    @CrabKey The scary thing is that some younger fans would not bat an eye over a scene like that.

    Speaking of possible Bond actors, I just recalled something about being a BIG fan of "The Equalizer" TV series, which was originally created as a star vehicle for George Lazenby before it was offered to Woodward by the Network. From what I read in the reviews, the movie version was received well, but the casting of Denzel was too outside model for me and I never saw either one or the Queen Latifha version. Looked like it lost it's very British roots to main character.

    That's interesting, thanks for the trivia, @delfloria 🙂
  • Posts: 1,860
    SIS_HQ wrote: »
    delfloria wrote: »
    @CrabKey The scary thing is that some younger fans would not bat an eye over a scene like that.

    Speaking of possible Bond actors, I just recalled something about being a BIG fan of "The Equalizer" TV series, which was originally created as a star vehicle for George Lazenby before it was offered to Woodward by the Network. From what I read in the reviews, the movie version was received well, but the casting of Denzel was too outside model for me and I never saw either one or the Queen Latifha version. Looked like it lost it's very British roots to main character.

    That's interesting, thanks for the trivia, @delfloria 🙂

    Trivia?
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited September 15 Posts: 16,430
    delfloria wrote: »
    @CrabKey The scary thing is that some younger fans would not bat an eye over a scene like that.

    I feel like we’re in the realms of fantasy now. What films have sequences like that which anyone likes?
    Young people nowadays etc.
    delfloria wrote: »
    Speaking of possible Bond actors, I just recalled something about being a BIG fan of "The Equalizer" TV series, which was originally created as a star vehicle for George Lazenby before it was offered to Woodward by the Network. From what I read in the reviews, the movie version was received well, but the casting of Denzel was too outside model for me and I never saw either one or the Queen Latifha version. Looked like it lost it's very British roots to main character.

    The Denzel ones are worth a watch: it’s not really the same thing, no, but very enjoyable action drama stuff. And it’s all about an old guy beating up youngsters, so all boomers should love it.
  • edited September 15 Posts: 4,174
    Indeed, kids today with their vapes and video games and snapchats are ruining Bond (or at least will when Bond himself does these himself, and this will 100% happen, no question at all).

    It’s not like we ever saw Bond wearing flares, or sporting sideburns or a digital watch in the 70s. That’d be ridiculous and dated. Same for the films jumping on some sort of popular movie trend. Wouldn’t have happened in the good old days, clearly.
  • edited September 15 Posts: 2,000
    Using Connery as an example, his style of dress was quite different in DAF. Though fashionable then, caught me off guard. Never was a fan of the pink shirts and ties, white belts, and plaids. It seemed odd then and certainly outdated now. Bond always works better for me in a tailored, dark suit. Of late Craig's suits seemed about one size too small.

    No, I don't believe we'll see a vaping, video playing, ignoring his date for his phone Bond. But I also hope we don't see a Bond that self-consciously tries identify with the current generation. Age alone should be enough. I hope we don't see Bond drinking a Red Bull at breakfast. One of the things I didn't like about Higson's novel was his cues to modernize Bond. They felt like neon signs advertising Bond as modern. Unnecessary. Let Bond be that cool guy unconcerned by whatever is in vogue at the moment.

    He can wear his designer suits, drive the latest car, keep time on a fabulous watch, but don't pander. I never wanted a Bond to be me like me. I wanted to be like him.
  • Posts: 564
    It's an interesting question because there are some ways where they have updated the character to be more reflective of the current generation (treatment of women and cessation of tobacco), but these don't really code as being of a particular generation because they became societal trends. Whatever happens to "Gen Z-ify" Bond will likely be things that started among youth but permeated to wider social/cultural norms.

    I can't really think of a good analogue to these two instances, however.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited September 15 Posts: 16,430
    Yeah I can't see a way in which Higson's Bond wasn't just the Bond we've always known but in the modern day. I think it's slightly confused and contradictory to say that he should be unconcerned by what's in vogue and yet wear fashionable suits and drive the latest car. Which is it.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    echo wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Skyfall seems extremely dated to me now. There isn't even an ounce of Gen Z in that film. Its a terminally millenial treatise.

    Hopefully there will NEVER be an ounce of Gen Z in an Bond film ever.

    Haha, I tend to agree. 😄

    I don’t even know what Gen Z in a Bond film would entail, lol?!! Sounds like someone is asking for fads or something? But fads come and go faster than at any other time in history, lol! Bond, like other films, simply needs to do what he does best, and the various generations will come.

    Bond #7 can send a TikTok to M. This needs to happen.

    😂 Will he be lip-syncing to a pop song?
  • Posts: 1,860
    As much as I rag on EON sometimes, I am secure in my belief that they will not gratuitously overlay Bond with many of the traits expressed in the above posts. No candle lit dinners with cell phones in hand.
  • edited September 15 Posts: 957
    Have a member of the public capture him on their phone when he's in action. Maybe bring that up in M's office...
    M: "Keep a low profile next time, Bond."

    Perhaps Q can invent some EMP comms scrambler device that he uses next time someone is filming him...
    B: "You won't be uploading that to TikTok."

    Moneypenny walks in with her tablet showing a news article headline... MYSTERY HERO... SECRET SPY OR SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCER

  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    Posts: 688
    I'm quite certain you could've had this discussion any time since Connery left. Will the next Bond be a dope smoking pacifist to satisfy the burgeoning Baby Boomers? Will he be a nihilistic slacker to win favour with Generation X?

    Were such concerns warranted? You tell me.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    edited September 15 Posts: 9,509
    I'm quite certain you could've had this discussion any time since Connery left. Will the next Bond be a dope smoking pacifist to satisfy the burgeoning Baby Boomers? Will he be a nihilistic slacker to win favour with Generation X?

    Were such concerns warranted? You tell me.

    Another big +1.

    A lot of what’s been brought up have never been in a Bond film and will never be in a Bond film.

    And I’m still waiting to read what Gen Z elements should have been in Skyfall, because, according to one poster, it’s now a dated film (my mind boggles). And I also don’t know why Mojitos and beach tops and lasers are considered Gen Z to others (they used DAD as an example).

    Either way I don’t think Bond will ever turn into whatever the latest flash in the pan is. They may take elements from contemporary stories/films, pluck ideas from newspapers, but I doubt we will see a Bond with an arm tattoo that listens to Joe Rogan before going to put bad guys to sleep…

Sign In or Register to comment.