It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Well, Lyutsifer Safin is a version of Lucifer Satan so that fits. >:)
Ah, I thought it was done arcane Q-related knowledge only you would know! :))
Yes, I think that must be what it is too. What a name to call a dog!
It's really pressing the lemon.
The literary James Bond has become like a pig in a meat processing plant. The only thing they lose is the squeal.
I guess it's the same with many IPs, but it doesn't fit Bond well. He lives in a "small" universe: the staff around him are exactly that: peripheral. It's not like Star Wars, with a whole galaxy to take your characters to (and from). Or the Arthurian legend.
This would be the last chance I’d give to a Bond spinoff for awhile. I’m happy that IFP took a chance, though. I hope people give Q a chance, as he’s always an enjoyable character.
I think there's been a move by IFP in the last two decades or so (basically since the Fleming family took over full control of the Bond literary copyright) to expand the Bond universe in various directions. So we've seen the likes of Young Bond, the Moneypenny Diaries, Felix Leiter comics and now this Q Mysteries series as expanded universe experiments. The Q Mysteries series is a little different in that he's really only a film Bond character and so it leads to a blurring of the lines between the literary Bond and film Bond. I'd have to say that that's something I'm really totally opposed to on principle. I realise that some of the continuation Bond novels under John Gardner and Raymond Benson had elements more in keeping with the Bond films but that's as far as I'd ideally want them to go in terms of crossover between the two distinct versions of Bond.
I agree that Bond is different from most other franchises in that Bond is really the only main recurring character of note. Yes, of course M, Bill Tanner, Moneypenny, Major Boothroyd/Q and Felix Leiter do play their respective parts but are any of them really interesting enough in their own right to carry a novel or a series of their own? I'm not so sure, even though they appear to have carried it off in the past. With these expanded universe types of thing there's always less or even no Bond involvement making you wonder what the point of it all is? I mean James Bond is what it's all about surely? The films and the adult Bond novels should be the bread and butter of the IP are are still what I think most serious minded Bond fans are really interested in and not extraneous matter which, no matter how interesting or otherwise, only takes us further away from the character of James Bond himself. And ultimately James Bond is why we're all fans of this particular character and indeed ultimately why we're all here.
Memorandum sent 18/1/2025
Classification: Gold level (For Your Eyes Only)
Dear colleagues,
The start of a new year. A time for resolutions. Including several dictated to us from on high. It won’t have escaped your notice that the recent Spending Review has left Q Branch leaner, greener, and, decidedly, meaner. It has further been suggested that we “foster a culture where EQ – Emotional Quotient – and not merely IQ – is employed as a metric of success.” I recently discussed this with M.
M’s contention is that agents trained to eliminate – with extreme prejudice – our enemies don’t need to be mollycoddled. His exact words were “Q, I don’t expect our Double Os to sit around holding hands singing “Kumbaya”, before putting a bullet through the likes of Blofeld.”
Nevertheless, this is the ideal moment to re-evaluate our role as the research and development division of the British Secret Service. The fact is that we have long been invaluable to our nation’s intelligence apparatus. On a recent trip to the archives, the idea of a Q Branch museum was mooted. Splendid notion.
Looking back, I am astounded by the inventiveness of our predecessors.
Take, for instance, the ‘pigeon camera’, a device designed to be strapped to Lord Nelson’s least favourite bird. In between dodging bombs and bullets, these adventurous pigeon pilots took thousands of critical reconnaissance photos during WW1. So effective were they that several went on to the status of war hero. I note here one such medallist: Cher Ami – “dear friend” to the linguistically challenged – awarded the Croix de Guerre by the French government. His stuffed remains may now be found in the Smithsonian Institute.
From the sublime to the ridiculous.
Back in the 1970s, our old friends across the pond, the CIA, developed what would become known as the T1151 “Dog Doo” transmitter. Deployed during the Vietnam War, this homing beacon was used to track supply movements along the Ho Chi Minh trail. The beacon was camouflaged to resemble a medium-sized faecal dropping. How’s that for lateral thinking?
This memo constitutes the first of a monthly series. My own attempt to get a little more “touchy-feely”, in line with HQ’s diktat. To this end, I shall set a puzzle in each memo, a means of promoting a little Q Branch esprit de corps. See postscript below for this month’s brain teaser.
Finally, I need not remind everyone that our mission here at Q Branch remains to develop the tech that keeps our field agents safe and operational. As ever, we work behind the scenes. Not for us the power and the glory. Nevertheless, we may take great pride in what we do. So, whatever your new year’s resolution, be it to learn to play “Ode to Joy” on the kazoo or to run the London Marathon in a Godzilla suit, I wish more power to your elbow, and a productive new year.
Sincerely,
Major Boothroyd
Head of Q Branch
P.S. Here is your first puzzle. One “winner” shall be picked at random from all correct entries and will be mentioned in my following memo. Perhaps MI6 Archives might even stretch to rustling up a book to send you?* Pot luck, I’m afraid! Fill in this form to enter... This month’s puzzle is as follows: To whom am I referring below?
A headless corpse, this spy leaves behind.
And disputed legacy, now out of mind.
Enchantress once of men of state.
A byword now for quisling’s fate.
P.P.S. In light of the recent mishap with 007’s Bentley, no further vehicles are to be authorised to Double O agents without my express approval.
*UK entrants only, I’m afraid!