Where does Bond go after Craig?

1738739740741742744»

Comments

  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,846
    So how do we know when development ends and pre-production officially begins?
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,577
    So how do we know when development ends and pre-production officially begins?

    They are technically not in development.

    Development: this is the period when writers are hired to develop a script and a director is brought on board and the lead actor (s) is/are attached. When the script and attachments get greenlit by the studio, that’s when a project moves into preproduction.

    Preproduction:
    Finalizing the script into a shooting draft. Fleshing out the other casting. Hiring heads of departments that will hire the crews. Storyboarding. Location scouting. Sets. Costumes.

    When all this prep is complete, roll cameras.

    Lots more than this, but the above gives a guideline.

    So until we hear of a director and a writer(s) coming on board, then B26 isn’t even in proper Development yet.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,750
    I wonder if we'll hear about rumoured screentests and who was tested
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,568
    Until a writer and director are involved I’m ignoring any rumors of Bond casting.
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    Posts: 1,390
    The next Spider-Man is shooting in London this summer and the Harry Potter TV show has just announced most of it's supporting cast and has had a writer's room in London for quite a while. They're probably currently in the process of finding or finalising the leading kids there, plus all the other pre-production stuff as they are also supposed to start shooting later this year. So while I'm sure they are putting work into Bond, Pascal and Heyman have a lot of stuff to do in the UK...
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,846
    Based on all this I assume 2027 is quite an optimistic timeline for release.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,568
    2030 seems likely.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,474
    I think the latest it can be, would be a 2028 release. But let's hope for a 2027 release. I also think the scale of Bond 26 would determine its release date.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,834
    The next Spider-Man is shooting in London this summer and the Harry Potter TV show has just announced most of it's supporting cast and has had a writer's room in London for quite a while. They're probably currently in the process of finding or finalising the leading kids there, plus all the other pre-production stuff as they are also supposed to start shooting later this year. So while I'm sure they are putting work into Bond, Pascal and Heyman have a lot of stuff to do in the UK...

    Plus they have another film they've made together which hasn't released yet.
  • Posts: 233
    peter wrote: »
    It seems officially the project hasn’t moved into preproduction yet— there is, as far as the industry is concerned (and not from Insneider-types), that no writers have been attached, nor a director.

    If this holds (and IMDbpro has B26 as “announcement”, and not even “in development”), then these are very early days indeed.

    yeah maybe like 2028-2029
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,971
    Modern day Bond movie posters should use Robert E. McGinnis as a influence. Not this Bond solo or one other person crap. A mix of characters helps make a good Bond poster standout.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,834
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Modern day Bond movie posters should use Robert E. McGinnis as a influence. Not this Bond solo or one other person crap. A mix of characters helps make a good Bond poster standout.

    To be fair I’d say the opposite: to make a poster really stand out in a crowded environment, a simple, striking image is often best. A big image of Bond alone, looking like Bond does that job. People know what a Bond film is and what it offers: the job of the poster now is kind of just to tell them there’s a new Bond film.
  • Posts: 1,837
    mtm wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Modern day Bond movie posters should use Robert E. McGinnis as a influence. Not this Bond solo or one other person crap. A mix of characters helps make a good Bond poster standout.

    To be fair I’d say the opposite: to make a poster really stand out in a crowded environment, a simple, striking image is often best. A big image of Bond alone, looking like Bond does that job. People know what a Bond film is and what it offers: the job of the poster now is kind of just to tell them there’s a new Bond film.

    You're not going to get a new audience this way.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    Posts: 774
    mtm wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Modern day Bond movie posters should use Robert E. McGinnis as a influence. Not this Bond solo or one other person crap. A mix of characters helps make a good Bond poster standout.

    To be fair I’d say the opposite: to make a poster really stand out in a crowded environment, a simple, striking image is often best. A big image of Bond alone, looking like Bond does that job. People know what a Bond film is and what it offers: the job of the poster now is kind of just to tell them there’s a new Bond film.

    You're not going to get a new audience this way.

    A simple, minimalist poster is best for grabbing the attention of people scrolling through their social media feed, which is how a lot of people learn about new movies these days. And ultimately, there's no point in doing a big, detailed poster if it's just going to get compressed on a tiny phone screen.
  • Posts: 1,837
    mtm wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Modern day Bond movie posters should use Robert E. McGinnis as a influence. Not this Bond solo or one other person crap. A mix of characters helps make a good Bond poster standout.

    To be fair I’d say the opposite: to make a poster really stand out in a crowded environment, a simple, striking image is often best. A big image of Bond alone, looking like Bond does that job. People know what a Bond film is and what it offers: the job of the poster now is kind of just to tell them there’s a new Bond film.

    You're not going to get a new audience this way.

    A simple, minimalist poster is best for grabbing the attention of people scrolling through their social media feed, which is how a lot of people learn about new movies these days. And ultimately, there's no point in doing a big, detailed poster if it's just going to get compressed on a tiny phone screen.

    I don't know, Marvel usually shows off its entire cast on its posters. They're ugly as hell, but they do it.
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    Posts: 1,390
    mtm wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Modern day Bond movie posters should use Robert E. McGinnis as a influence. Not this Bond solo or one other person crap. A mix of characters helps make a good Bond poster standout.

    To be fair I’d say the opposite: to make a poster really stand out in a crowded environment, a simple, striking image is often best. A big image of Bond alone, looking like Bond does that job. People know what a Bond film is and what it offers: the job of the poster now is kind of just to tell them there’s a new Bond film.

    You're not going to get a new audience this way.

    A simple, minimalist poster is best for grabbing the attention of people scrolling through their social media feed, which is how a lot of people learn about new movies these days. And ultimately, there's no point in doing a big, detailed poster if it's just going to get compressed on a tiny phone screen.

    I don't know, Marvel usually shows off its entire cast on its posters. They're ugly as hell, but they do it.

    Which begs the question whether the next Bond film is going to be (sold as) an ensemble film or focus on the new lead guy. Because the main draw - or at least the main strategy - for these Marvel things is "look at all your favourites together! There's someone for everyone, so bring the whole family". Bond is obviously a different proposition.

    I never know which posters are or were the most important ones for past films, but it seems like the Craig ones go from Craig with some stills from the film to Craig and Kurylenko to the last three basically all being Craig in a dinner jacket with a gun.

    At the threat of pushing this too close to the "Team Bond" discussion, I do wonder if they will try to highlight more Bondian tropes, maybe even without the actor on the main cover ("Never mind who the actor is. You want guns and cars and girls and martinis, so here's that!"), or if they're going to cast a murderer's row of supporting actors and almost hide their rather inexperienced and maybe less known lead or if they're just going full bore "Bond is Back! This is him now! He's awesome!", kind of like that Goldeneye "You were expecting someone else?" swagger.
  • sandbagger1sandbagger1 Sussex
    Posts: 1,030
    I’d love it if they got a real artist to paint a Bond poster, rather than getting an intern to photoshop a montage; most of the Craig films just used an image of him (usually a photo), and it worked okay, but it’s getting pretty old imo. Time to mix it up a bit and give the new Bond posters a different feel. I love the Live and Let Die poster, which is carefully constructed with its Tarot card images and creative composition, so I wouldn’t mind a return to that.
    qioyso3.jpg

    Alternatively, if they wanted to keep it fairly simple, a single image of the new Bond from fashion illustrator David Downton might look very stylish.

  • edited 9:08am Posts: 5,069
    Oh, I’d say the CR poster with a shadowy Bond at the poker table with his gun is one of the best Bond posters of all time. Very simple and quite striking. Was there not a teaser poster for QOS just with Bond’s shadow on the ground too? I liked that one. I even like the main posters for those films (Bond with his tie undone outside the casino for CR, and Bond with the machine gun in the desert in QOS).

    As said, there are issues with big, detailed movie posters, and I don’t think we’ll see a return to the McGinnis style. Illustrated posters in general give off a ‘vintage’ sense, and I think Bond needs to feel classy, but ultimately modern. Not to say all of the recent Bond posters have been great (they can feel a bit too minimalist from SF onwards). But it’d be great if we got a sense of Bond in the environment of the film.
Sign In or Register to comment.