EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards (Heyman and Pascal confirmed as producers)

17172737476

Comments

  • Posts: 1,990
    As long as they keep casting big names in the MI6 roles they’re gonna feel obligated to write to those actors.

    Hoping they do not go this direction.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,570
    With the precedent already having been set, I doubt it’ll go to no-names.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    edited April 21 Posts: 775
    I don't mind the MI6 gang continuing to have a larger role, but I wouldn't want them to have the same level of involvement as the last three Craigs, in EVERY film. I'd still like Bond to be the lone wolf without too much assistance from home.

    I definitely wouldn't want Bond being on comms link during the climax to become the standard, even though it's probably more realistic in this day and age.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,846
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ultimately I think it depends. I can see them wanting to use M a bit more/have some sort of drama come from them, even if minor, if a big name actor is cast.

    There’s plenty that can be done, and they certainly don’t have to be used to the extent Dench and Fiennes were in the last few films. As said there’s stuff in the Fleming books that could be riffed on. Just depends on what’s interesting for the film/the story they want to tell.

    Yeah exactly, it depends. If there’s a story there and they have it they should go for it. If not, then don’t.
  • Posts: 1,990
    I don't mind the MI6 gang continuing to have a larger role, but I wouldn't want them to have the same level of involvement as the last three Craigs, in EVERY film. I'd still like Bond to be the lone wolf without too much assistance from home.

    I definitely wouldn't want Bond being on comms link during the climax to become the standard, even though it's probably more realistic in this day and age.

    Being on a comms link would be more realistic so I will just have to count on the filmmakers to have the villain relieve Bond of it.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,846
    Or just be in a situation where it’s believable he doesn’t. In any of the Craigs the tech was there, but he was often out on his own or thrown into the situation so it was believable there wouldn’t be a comms link.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,661
    I want to see Bond and Moneypenny have an on-again, off-again relationship and drag the entire MI6 staff into it including M, Q, Tanner, Villiers, and of course, a rebooted Frederick Gray. Some passive-aggression and people walking on eggshells and wondering what's going on between James and Eve every day. Bring in the HR director and let Bond have an affair with her too.
  • Posts: 15,543
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ultimately I think it depends. I can see them wanting to use M a bit more/have some sort of drama come from them, even if minor, if a big name actor is cast.

    There’s plenty that can be done, and they certainly don’t have to be used to the extent Dench and Fiennes were in the last few films. As said there’s stuff in the Fleming books that could be riffed on. Just depends on what’s interesting for the film/the story they want to tell.

    I'd like M to be to Bond what Mycroft is to Sherlock: the smarter one, who can see the bigger picture. In the novel TB, it's M who figures out SPECTRE's plan, and he even deduces the existence of a mastermind behind it. I'd love to see this in a Bond film.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,570
    It is curious that Frederick Gray was never brought back. After TLD we had one defense minister pop up in TND and that was that.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    Posts: 775
    echo wrote: »
    I want to see Bond and Moneypenny have an on-again, off-again relationship and drag the entire MI6 staff into it including M, Q, Tanner, Villiers, and of course, a rebooted Frederick Gray. Some passive-aggression and people walking on eggshells and wondering what's going on between James and Eve every day. Bring in the HR director and let Bond have an affair with her too.

    Sounds a bit too soap opera-ish for my taste.
  • Posts: 5,075
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ultimately I think it depends. I can see them wanting to use M a bit more/have some sort of drama come from them, even if minor, if a big name actor is cast.

    There’s plenty that can be done, and they certainly don’t have to be used to the extent Dench and Fiennes were in the last few films. As said there’s stuff in the Fleming books that could be riffed on. Just depends on what’s interesting for the film/the story they want to tell.

    I'd like M to be to Bond what Mycroft is to Sherlock: the smarter one, who can see the bigger picture. In the novel TB, it's M who figures out SPECTRE's plan, and he even deduces the existence of a mastermind behind it. I'd love to see this in a Bond film.

    That'd be quite interesting! It'd be quite cool seeing the new M and Bond play off each other in a briefing in that way.

    As for a return of a Defence Minister, I'd personally prefer if he wasn't in the room while Bond is being briefed. I was never a fan of Grey in the Moore films constantly sitting in on the briefings and flapping his jowl around.
  • Posts: 15,543
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ultimately I think it depends. I can see them wanting to use M a bit more/have some sort of drama come from them, even if minor, if a big name actor is cast.

    There’s plenty that can be done, and they certainly don’t have to be used to the extent Dench and Fiennes were in the last few films. As said there’s stuff in the Fleming books that could be riffed on. Just depends on what’s interesting for the film/the story they want to tell.

    I'd like M to be to Bond what Mycroft is to Sherlock: the smarter one, who can see the bigger picture. In the novel TB, it's M who figures out SPECTRE's plan, and he even deduces the existence of a mastermind behind it. I'd love to see this in a Bond film.

    That'd be quite interesting! It'd be quite cool seeing the new M and Bond play off each other in a briefing in that way.

    As for a return of a Defence Minister, I'd personally prefer if he wasn't in the room while Bond is being briefed. I was never a fan of Grey in the Moore films constantly sitting in on the briefings and flapping his jowl around.

    I think Grey was there just to give the situation an extra layer of tension: the Defence Minister is here, things are bad.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,846
    Plus just having another character there is quite helpful to bounce things off, hence Tanner being more present after that.
  • Posts: 5,075
    I suppose, although I think having multiple people in the room every time takes away something from those briefings. I’d definitely like a one to one with M and Bond in the next one.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,267
    I'd like to see M & Bond together, but I would like to see a gathering of all Double-Ohs again like the briefing seen in Thunderball. Gives a great sense of the size of the section, and in that film, it was relative to the size of the threat. And then Bond does what none of the others can do - save the day!
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,577
    I'd like to see M & Bond together, but I would like to see a gathering of all Double-Ohs again like the briefing seen in Thunderball. Gives a great sense of the size of the section, and in that film, it was relative to the size of the threat. And then Bond does what none of the others can do - save the day!
    Yes, yes and yes.
  • Posts: 6,838
    peter wrote: »
    I'd like to see M & Bond together, but I would like to see a gathering of all Double-Ohs again like the briefing seen in Thunderball. Gives a great sense of the size of the section, and in that film, it was relative to the size of the threat. And then Bond does what none of the others can do - save the day!
    Yes, yes and yes.

    And yes!
    007HallY wrote: »
    I suppose, although I think having multiple people in the room every time takes away something from those briefings. I’d definitely like a one to one with M and Bond in the next one.

    Also, this. And both can happen, as in TB. One right after the other. The gathering and then the individual briefing.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,760
    I'd like to see M & Bond together, but I would like to see a gathering of all Double-Ohs again like the briefing seen in Thunderball. Gives a great sense of the size of the section, and in that film, it was relative to the size of the threat. And then Bond does what none of the others can do - save the day!

    Absolutely. A small thing I love about that scene is the look M gives Bond when he arrives late.

    I hope the next M has a scene were they back Bond's instincts, I love bit in Thunderball also.
  • Posts: 1,990
    echo wrote: »
    I want to see Bond and Moneypenny have an on-again, off-again relationship and drag the entire MI6 staff into it including M, Q, Tanner, Villiers, and of course, a rebooted Frederick Gray. Some passive-aggression and people walking on eggshells and wondering what's going on between James and Eve every day. Bring in the HR director and let Bond have an affair with her too.

    Sounds a bit too soap opera-ish for my taste.

    I think his comment was done with tongue firmly planted in cheek.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,760
    I'd love the next Bond film to have a couple of locations but explore them a bit more. I loved seeing Jamaica and Matera in NTTD, I just wanted to see more of them
  • Posts: 1,990
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I'd love the next Bond film to have a couple of locations but explore them a bit more. I loved seeing Jamaica and Matera in NTTD, I just wanted to see more of them

    A lot of the charm is staying in one or two locations and soaking in the culture of the areas.
  • Posts: 241
    peter wrote: »
    I'd like to see M & Bond together, but I would like to see a gathering of all Double-Ohs again like the briefing seen in Thunderball. Gives a great sense of the size of the section, and in that film, it was relative to the size of the threat. And then Bond does what none of the others can do - save the day!
    Yes, yes and yes.

    +1
  • JustJamesJustJames London
    Posts: 228
    007HallY wrote: »
    A self-parody film can also work. You can use the tropes and the audience will accept them.

    I don't know what they're going to do, but I wouldn't rule out this so easily.

    I wouldn’t call it parody, but arguably that self referentiality/subversions is something we got in the Craig era. And all Bond films are tongue in cheek to some extent.

    But I agree, it’s impossible to say what they’ll do at the moment. I think the only thing that applies is it’ll most likely be a ‘reinvention’ Bond film as EON used to say, and that’s only in the sense they’ll be introducing a brand new Bond and not continuing on from the previous few films plot wise.

    People always talked about Connery at the time, largely because of the suits, and the quasi-retro styling of CR I think. But people often seemed to rarely take into account that Craig’s Bond would have been Moore, not Connery. That’s why there is a *ton* of little Moore era nods in the Craig era. TSWLM seems to have a reference in many of them (tie dropping off roof, Hinx as a latter day jaws, much of the styling when not in Suit is very Roger, not least because Craig is closer to him in colouring, the dinner jacket in the desert, the humour when coming from Bond is actually more Roger than anyone else, but mainly it’s in key visuals to be honest)
  • Posts: 111
    This has been in my drafts for a few days:

    Introduce a new higher-up CIA character, a woman with strong presence like Jennifer Lopez/Scarlett Johansson. Bond has a quiet admiration for her, and vice versa, but she's witty and keeps Bond's masculinity in check. Maybe in a later film, in a moment between life and death - an earned kiss.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,493
    dewiparry wrote: »
    This has been in my drafts for a few days:

    Introduce a new higher-up CIA character, a woman with strong presence like Jennifer Lopez/Scarlett Johansson. Bond has a quiet admiration for her, and vice versa, but she's witty and keeps Bond's masculinity in check. Maybe in a later film, in a moment between life and death - an earned kiss.

    Yeah. Cool idea. Although, I think an actress like Carrie Coon could work better. I think Lopez & Johansson are way too famous.
  • Posts: 111
    dewiparry wrote: »
    This has been in my drafts for a few days:

    Introduce a new higher-up CIA character, a woman with strong presence like Jennifer Lopez/Scarlett Johansson. Bond has a quiet admiration for her, and vice versa, but she's witty and keeps Bond's masculinity in check. Maybe in a later film, in a moment between life and death - an earned kiss.

    Yeah. Cool idea. Although, I think an actress like Carrie Coon could work better. I think Lopez & Johansson are way too famous.

    I'm looking for that sexy energy between them, something quiet, electric. Was only thinking of a small role in the office scenes. Bond can still have his younger women interests on his missions.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited April 26 Posts: 2,493
    dewiparry wrote: »
    dewiparry wrote: »
    This has been in my drafts for a few days:

    Introduce a new higher-up CIA character, a woman with strong presence like Jennifer Lopez/Scarlett Johansson. Bond has a quiet admiration for her, and vice versa, but she's witty and keeps Bond's masculinity in check. Maybe in a later film, in a moment between life and death - an earned kiss.

    Yeah. Cool idea. Although, I think an actress like Carrie Coon could work better. I think Lopez & Johansson are way too famous.

    I'm looking for that sexy energy between them, something quiet, electric. Was only thinking of a small role in the office scenes. Bond can still have his younger women interests on his missions.

    Yeah. I know. But I meant like....they're way too famous for a Bond film. It's like giving Stallone or Schwarzenegger a cameo in a Bond film. It's a small role, but they're still in a Bond film.
  • Posts: 111
    Yeah. I know. But I meant like....they're way too famous for a Bond film. It's like giving Stallone or Schwarzenegger a cameo in a Bond film. It's a small role, but they're still in a Bond film.
    I get that famous part. But I wasn't even thinking of it as a cameo, more of a supporting role with weight. We've had Grace Jones, Christopher Walken and Madonna, and they were more famous. Any very attractive boss lady could fit my idea tbh.

  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited April 26 Posts: 3,271
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I'd love the next Bond film to have a couple of locations but explore them a bit more. I loved seeing Jamaica and Matera in NTTD, I just wanted to see more of them
    Yes, same. I thought that there was a lot of potential in both locations to explore that Bondian sense of something dangerous and corrupt just behind the superficially beautiful surface facade and to add a bit of neo-noir to the mix. Would've loved to have seen those elements brought out more.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    edited 9:56am Posts: 775
    JustJames wrote: »
    But people often seemed to rarely take into account that Craig’s Bond would have been Moore, not Connery.

    What do you mean?
Sign In or Register to comment.