It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
this is it: http://www.allmoviephoto.com/photo/2012_skyfall_006.html
and the GB, I hope I remember correctly, because it was just 10s or so. so no 100% guarantee for that :)
unfortunately, I have to wait 2 more weeks to see it again, then I'll concentrate on all the important details... ;)
Thanks a lot, friend
Like I thought, it will be difficult to equal a gunbarrel to start a Bond film...
[-X
That's replaced the gunbarrel? Jeez.
Touche. That´s detente, comrade...
Sorry, I'll rephrase: That's what's replaced the gunbarrel at the beginning of the movie? Jeez.
I beginning to get the idea of how this is going to start and if it is, I can say I'm very excited to see this considering scene you showed there are other sequence stills we've seen that appear to be linked to that shot and it's all starting to make sense.
I have to say I'm still open to see what they've done, if the film is going to end like has been surmised by some and the little tease from some reviews I can see the point of positioning the GB where it is.
Yes the repositioning of this again is going to irritate the hell out of some and the idea that Bond is not yet complete but SF seems to have moved on some from the events of CR & QOS putting some distance between those films and Craig's Bond is obviously more seasoned but it seems SF is once again an arc like the previous films and Bond isn't quite the finished article.
People have wanted that traditional Leather Door and male M back and I think this film is setting that up, it all depends if you can stomach another film where it's moulding as opposed to the finished article, if this is so and they are using Bond and M's back story as a main thrust of this film then maybe at the end we get Bond like he's introduced in DN ( no I'm not linking the 2 like some silly people have tried). I'm saying Craig's Bond will be in the same place that Bond started in 1962, quite apt when you consider this is the 50th Anniversary.
Noes. Teh world is gonna end :)]
I would have thought Bond as the finished article would have been the perfect celebration - not more Freudian lark.
Of course the changing of the GB was going to give us heated discussions, but this is becoming laughable.
If you can't accept other people's opinions, well, ok. But that's not for me.
Sorry, but you're the one who doesn't accept other people's opinions. You say the gunbarrel is not important, and yet you come here every day and comment on it. Does anyone force you to do it? Do you have a mission or something? There are certain aspects of Bond I don't care about, and I don't comment on them.
Don't get me wrong, but while you're implying that some people here are childish, it's actually you who is being childish. If you don't think this subject is important, just ignore it, it doesn't influence your life in any way. That's what mature people do.
I have been called an ass , a dick and a numb head.
And where did I say the GB is not important? I've stated that it's not that big of a deal, for me that is, that it's at the end.
That makes us two.
To be fair, you've been laughing the whole time.
I'm at peace with it now. I wouldn't mind the gunbarrel always being at the end from here on. A new tradition!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=0aVJg0wkSOQ&NR=1
And I have to insist, that actually my inisting that Craig should have ahd a beard in SF have been appreciated after all...
Not once have I laughed, sir.
Carry on.
Oh God, no.
I'm opposed to totalitarianism.
The GB belongs at the beginning, period, paragraph, end of story.
It was retarded in QoS, there's even less excuse now.
Some conventions you just don't mess with...it doesn't make you edgy, or artsy, it makes you disrespectful of a series and its canon. Not to mention its fans without whom there'd be no series.
Never underestimate a Director's selfish, stupid impulse to put "their stamp" on a work, monkey with its canon, in order to "make it his own" (vision, or whatever the f)......
If you direct a Superman movie, damnit, the costume is red and blue not purple and orange. Excellence is more important than overrated originality.
Bond painfully peeing blood at the urinal for two hours would be original, right? Some New York artsy fartsy critics would probably call a two hour examination of Bond's prostate "brilliant".
I am deeply, profoundly disappointed.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2012/oct/21/skyfall-sam-mendes-daniel-craig?newsfeed=true
One can hope so that this whole thread becomes meaningless [-O<
How I understand it that just means he was editing until just before the press screening.
But even if Mendes is making some adjustments, he won't move the gunbarrel. Thats wishful thinking. :) Just watch the movie and try to enjoy it anyway. It must be good, so many reviewers can only seldomly be wrong.