It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
but there is a fine line... in OP, an aging Roger Moore next to a more mature Maud Adams worked - it was believable... in the very next film, an old Roger Moore next to a very young Tanya Roberts is borderline creepy..
Seriously though, I am very sorry if I spoiled it for anyone.
She still looks great, and I would be honored to have her on my arm but in Bond 24?
Naw...
Talented actress????
If it's false, that contributor is such an asshole for leading me a heartattack with such a horrible piece of new.
If Monica Bellucci will be in the movie, I really hope she's gonna be dubbed.
Agreed a 100%, BUT Adams looked way better then,than Bellucci now. Probably because she was more than 10 years younger in OP.
Well,one can hope.
Logan story credit and P + W screenplay credit?
My suspicion is there will be a press release saying something like, "The screenplay is written by John Logan and Neal Purvis & Robert Wade."
If it's only Purvis & Wade, that means much, if not almost all, of Logan's draft got junked. If it only credits Logan, that means Purvis & Wade didn't do enough to get a credit. For the record, Baz Bamigboye has reported P&W's draft was substantially different.
In any case, something to keep watch for on Thursday.
he will still get his credit.... so it will still be Purvis, Wade, & Logan getting credit for this script... Butterworth will once again go uncredited..
i have often thought, that if Mendes was so put off by Logan's work on Bond 24 that he wasn't brought back - why not try to bring back Haggis?... the trio of Purvis, Wade and Haggis worked well on CR, and it's long been known that QOS was turned back in to the producers by Haggis unfinished because of the writer's strike..... so if Logan is given his walking papers, i would welcome back Paul with open arms..
Another possibility.
I just never have been impressed with Logan. Sure I loved Skyfall but hearing him speak in interviews I just never got a good impression. I feel like he was never the man to do the job. I certainly would rather have Purvis and Wade plus Haggis if possible!
Maybe she's cast as Léa Seydoux's boss? A French or Italian version of the late M.
Good thought. Didn't cross my mind.
And I cannot believe how much childish excitement I am experiencing right now knowing the PC is so close and certain details revealed?!!!! BRING IT ON!!!! \m/
you mean it isn't Thursday already?!?! :)
If it's not then my conscience will be clear. It does seem kind of odd to name it that, indeed.
Sadly not! :((
Wish I could celebrate that way. Gonna probably just watch Skyfall tomorrow.
everyone's reaction when the title is announced..
unless it's the Hildebrand Rarity or Risico then my level excitment will maintain
By the way, the actual introduction starts at 10:50AM in London.
Not sure if @marketto007 had already posted the exact times of the event on this thread, but here...
"EVENT TIMINGS (all timings GMT)
10.50am Introduction
11.00am Live announcement commences
11.07am Live announcement ends (approximate)
11.15am Photo call with cast and director"