Things We've Learned from…..Spectre

12526272830

Comments

  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    The thing I've learnt from Skyfall was that Sam Mendes was unable to follow it with a film worthy of it's accomplishments.

    For all it's criticisms of plot holes, it holds together and has got a killer climatic sequence, whereas SPECTRE is an utter mess of a film and has a climax devoid of tension or thrill.

    Skyfall despite it's detractors will not be forgotten or it's stature decrease, in fact the thing that SPECTRE was such a disappointment will play to SF strengths.

    SPECTRE will be the film that won't age well, whereas despite some fan boys opinions Skyfall will be one of the series most regarded films, it's new Goldfinger in that respect and it's the general public that will dictate that not a bunch of smart arses on this forum.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Shardlake wrote: »
    The thing I've learnt from Skyfall was that Sam Mendes was unable to follow it with a film worthy of it's accomplishments.

    For all it's criticisms of plot holes, it holds together and has got a killer climatic sequence, whereas SPECTRE is an utter mess of a film and has a climax devoid of tension or thrill.

    Skyfall despite it's detractors will not be forgotten or it's stature decrease, in fact the thing that SPECTRE was such a disappointment will play to SF strengths.

    SPECTRE will be the film that won't age well, whereas despite some fan boys opinions Skyfall will be one of the series most regarded films, it's new Goldfinger in that respect and it's the general public that will dictate that not a bunch of smart arses on this forum.

    Wait, what? You don't like SP @Shardlake? It's been hard to tell lately; I mean, it's not like you go into every thread on the forums (Bond related or not) spouting hatred for it or anything. Oh wait, you do, don't you? Funny, that. 8-|

    I guess my question now would be, do you have anything of substance to add beyond your childish moaning? You're like a baby after the teat, so wound up and in a tizzy at all hours. If you're worried that none of us know your opinions or have forgotten them, don't; we've heard them without end since SP began. The sad thing is that while you're wallowing in your overstated misery out there, the rest of us (smart arses" as you call us) are having a grand time being positive and happy. At the end of the day, you're just a hungry dog scratching at the door, and guess what? You can't come in.
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    I have no problem with SP hate, even though I don't understand it. GF lovers don't all understand my GF hate, so it's just par for the course. I'd love to understand how SF is better than SP, though. I love both films, but I find SP to be considerably better than SF, if for no other reason than Oberhauser's plan makes more sense than Silva's.
  • Posts: 12,473
    I strongly agree with @Birdleson, and that comes from a fan of Spectre. Everyone is going to have a different opinion; insulting people for their opinions doesn't accomplish anything good.
  • Ok, I here all the different opinions and I'm glad to read them, but it keeps us away from the real question : what's wrong with Oberhauser's not wearing socks in Morocco ? Seems to be a major debate issue.

  • Posts: 1,296
    No one is a smart arse no one is a baby and no one is a dog. It's ok not to like Spectre socks or not.
  • CommanderRossCommanderRoss The bottom of a pitch lake in Eastern Trinidad, place called La Brea
    Posts: 8,266
    Oh I am most definately a smart ass, arrogant paternalistic bastard. Makes any discussion way easier if you get all that out of the way at the beginning ;-)

    Anyway, even though I don't agree on both sides, I like SP and think Craig and Léa have great chemistry, but still think SP misses the beat with the Oberhauser background, there's a lot to say for both. And, well sustained, any side counts.

    However, this thread was once just fun mockery of all the Bond films, and it seems it's too early to pro.. eh... to do that with Spectre, as people don't seem to understand the essence of this thread (including the numbering of 'lessons learned') and go way too serious into the matter.
  • Posts: 9,847
    57. Q is good and lieing to M
    58. Tanner is not very good friends with 007
    59. C has no idea what democracy is
    60. Blofeld likes meteroites
    61. Blofeld has a nickname for his little brother 007
    62. Everyone has forgotten a film called Goldeneye and a film called Skyfall as both really play up the brother angle as well just not as overtly as Spectre
    63. Bond and Swann have a train pretty much to themselves
    64. Mr. White still has the best lines of the film
    65. Quantum changed its name to Spectre
    66. Mr. White has a nickname
    67. Mr White had a wife and daughter
    68. Mr White let a womanizing man protect his hot daughter because they wont sleep together
    69. Mr white is very dumb when choosing who to protect his daughter
    70. Old people in rome get scared when their car goes 70 mph but don't think to slame on the breaks
    71. Bond the man every man wants to be doesn't have a life apparently
    72. Bond quit mi6 for some reason
    73. Q has Cats
    74. Spectre has some sort of scheme against Cats
    75. Bond will protect Q's Cats
    76. Bond likes to ghost kiss women before they actually kiss them (seriously he kissed air with belucci and the Mexican girl)


    that's all for now :D
  • Posts: 1,296
    77. Bond will kill anyone and everyone no question asked but the head of SPECTRE? Nah he's good. :)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    78 In Mexico, it is fun to be dead.
  • Risico007 wrote: »
    57. Q is good and lieing to M
    58. Tanner is not very good friends with 007
    59. C has no idea what democracy is
    60. Blofeld likes meteroites
    61. Blofeld has a nickname for his little brother 007
    62. Everyone has forgotten a film called Goldeneye and a film called Skyfall as both really play up the brother angle as well just not as overtly as Spectre
    63. Bond and Swann have a train pretty much to themselves
    64. Mr. White still has the best lines of the film
    65. Quantum changed its name to Spectre
    66. Mr. White has a nickname
    67. Mr White had a wife and daughter
    68. Mr White let a womanizing man protect his hot daughter because they wont sleep together
    69. Mr white is very dumb when choosing who to protect his daughter
    70. Old people in rome get scared when their car goes 70 mph but don't think to slame on the breaks
    71. Bond the man every man wants to be doesn't have a life apparently
    72. Bond quit mi6 for some reason
    73. Q has Cats
    74. Spectre has some sort of scheme against Cats
    75. Bond will protect Q's Cats
    76. Bond likes to ghost kiss women before they actually kiss them (seriously he kissed air with belucci and the Mexican girl)


    that's all for now :D

    Excellent !
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited December 2015 Posts: 23,883
    Risico007 wrote: »
    76. Bond likes to ghost kiss women before they actually kiss them (seriously he kissed air with belucci and the Mexican girl)
    I'll have to pay attention to this fascinating observation when I watch the blu ray. Totally missed it.
  • Posts: 9,847
    yeah it was my third time viewing it in the cinema and I am like uhm why is Bond kissing air.. Did he get kissing lessons from the guy who was Sweeping in Quantum of Solace.


    79. Bond likes to be back seat driver in helicopters
    80. Spectre rarely meets yet the Wife of the dead member knows exactly where they will meet?
    81. lets wait a long time to kill Lucia Sciarra
    82. Mr Sciarra IS a fool for not spending more time with his wife
    83. being in Monica Bellucci's arms is a good way to die
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    84 Thirtyfive years on, the back of your neck will get you recocnized.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    He enjoys their breath, much like Brosnan enjoyed the lack thereof. It is a fetish.
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    85. SPECTRE, both in the sixties and today, has the largest table budget known to man.
    86. Somehow, killing a terrorist is wrong to the woman you've fallen in love with.
    87. Depending on how long after Skyfall this is, M took over MI6 just in time to be cut loose anyway.
    88. Q had quite a bit of time on his hands if he could secretly help Bond and rebuild the DB5.
    89. One of the most important things to MI6, even above arming the vehicle's weapons systems, is syncing an agent's MP3s.
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    Shardlake wrote: »
    The thing I've learnt from Skyfall was that Sam Mendes was unable to follow it with a film worthy of it's accomplishments.

    For all it's criticisms of plot holes, it holds together and has got a killer climatic sequence, whereas SPECTRE is an utter mess of a film and has a climax devoid of tension or thrill.

    Skyfall despite it's detractors will not be forgotten or it's stature decrease, in fact the thing that SPECTRE was such a disappointment will play to SF strengths.

    SPECTRE will be the film that won't age well, whereas despite some fan boys opinions Skyfall will be one of the series most regarded films, it's new Goldfinger in that respect and it's the general public that will dictate that not a bunch of smart arses on this forum.

    Wait, what? You don't like SP @Shardlake? It's been hard to tell lately; I mean, it's not like you go into every thread on the forums (Bond related or not) spouting hatred for it or anything. Oh wait, you do, don't you? Funny, that. 8-|

    I guess my question now would be, do you have anything of substance to add beyond your childish moaning? You're like a baby after the teat, so wound up and in a tizzy at all hours. If you're worried that none of us know your opinions or have forgotten them, don't; we've heard them without end since SP began. The sad thing is that while you're wallowing in your overstated misery out there, the rest of us (smart arses" as you call us) are having a grand time being positive and happy. At the end of the day, you're just a hungry dog scratching at the door, and guess what? You can't come in.

    My opinion is nothing compared to likes of Getafix who can't help but slag off Skyfall and has done for the last 3 years and constantly pops up in threads to repeat the same old argument like a broken record.

    I assure you I'l get over it soon enough but sorry some of us saw through the dodgy plot, terrible back story and the 2 lamest set pieces of the Craig era, I slightly prefer it it to QOS but the climax to that film was 10 times better than the underwhelming desert sequence and the disappointing MI6 set piece.

    Like Birdleson said when you remove the homages and that terrific PTS from it, it not like there is much there. It's pretty cold and empty lacking any danger or thrill. It's a pity because the Mr White scene is great and also the L'American scene and the train fight apart from Hinx's only bit of dialogue seems totally out of character.

    It also seems that the Skyfall detractors like it just because it's got the homages and Craig is playing confident Bond, it's a pity a terrific Craig performance is shackled to such an underwhelming product.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote: »
    The thing I've learnt from Skyfall was that Sam Mendes was unable to follow it with a film worthy of it's accomplishments.

    For all it's criticisms of plot holes, it holds together and has got a killer climatic sequence, whereas SPECTRE is an utter mess of a film and has a climax devoid of tension or thrill.

    Skyfall despite it's detractors will not be forgotten or it's stature decrease, in fact the thing that SPECTRE was such a disappointment will play to SF strengths.

    SPECTRE will be the film that won't age well, whereas despite some fan boys opinions Skyfall will be one of the series most regarded films, it's new Goldfinger in that respect and it's the general public that will dictate that not a bunch of smart arses on this forum.

    Wait, what? You don't like SP @Shardlake? It's been hard to tell lately; I mean, it's not like you go into every thread on the forums (Bond related or not) spouting hatred for it or anything. Oh wait, you do, don't you? Funny, that. 8-|

    I guess my question now would be, do you have anything of substance to add beyond your childish moaning? You're like a baby after the teat, so wound up and in a tizzy at all hours. If you're worried that none of us know your opinions or have forgotten them, don't; we've heard them without end since SP began. The sad thing is that while you're wallowing in your overstated misery out there, the rest of us (smart arses" as you call us) are having a grand time being positive and happy. At the end of the day, you're just a hungry dog scratching at the door, and guess what? You can't come in.

    My opinion is nothing compared to likes of Getafix who can't help but slag off Skyfall and has done for the last 3 years and constantly pops up in threads to repeat the same old argument like a broken record.

    I assure you I'l get over it soon enough but sorry some of us saw through the dodgy plot, terrible back story and the 2 lamest set pieces of the Craig era, I slightly prefer it it to QOS but the climax to that film was 10 times better than the underwhelming desert sequence and the disappointing MI6 set piece.

    Like Birdleson said when you remove the homages and that terrific PTS from it, it not like there is much there. It's pretty cold and empty lacking any danger or thrill. It's a pity because the Mr White scene is great and also the L'American scene and the train fight apart from Hinx's only bit of dialogue seems totally out of character.

    It also seems that the Skyfall detractors like it just because it's got the homages and Craig is playing confident Bond, it's a pity a terrific Craig performance is shackled to such an underwhelming product
    .

    @Shardlake, see, THIS is what I've wanted to see from you for a helluva time now. I hear so many people going on about how SP is bad without giving any kind of fleshed out arguments. Here, you did just that.

    Like I've said before, whether it's you, @Birdleson or @Getafix, I don't care what your views are, love or hate. What upsets me is when people feel underwhelmed by something and almost make it their unconscious mission to ruin the fun for everyone else by stating the same negative declarations over and over again (I hate this, this is the worst Bond film yet) in every thread without giving any reasons for why they actually feel that way.

    What you've done here by supplying your reasons for how it is underwhelming for you can actually create a discourse, and not a flame war. My hat is off to you sir, and I'm sorry for any animosity you may have felt thrown in your direction.
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote: »
    The thing I've learnt from Skyfall was that Sam Mendes was unable to follow it with a film worthy of it's accomplishments.

    For all it's criticisms of plot holes, it holds together and has got a killer climatic sequence, whereas SPECTRE is an utter mess of a film and has a climax devoid of tension or thrill.

    Skyfall despite it's detractors will not be forgotten or it's stature decrease, in fact the thing that SPECTRE was such a disappointment will play to SF strengths.

    SPECTRE will be the film that won't age well, whereas despite some fan boys opinions Skyfall will be one of the series most regarded films, it's new Goldfinger in that respect and it's the general public that will dictate that not a bunch of smart arses on this forum.

    Wait, what? You don't like SP @Shardlake? It's been hard to tell lately; I mean, it's not like you go into every thread on the forums (Bond related or not) spouting hatred for it or anything. Oh wait, you do, don't you? Funny, that. 8-|

    I guess my question now would be, do you have anything of substance to add beyond your childish moaning? You're like a baby after the teat, so wound up and in a tizzy at all hours. If you're worried that none of us know your opinions or have forgotten them, don't; we've heard them without end since SP began. The sad thing is that while you're wallowing in your overstated misery out there, the rest of us (smart arses" as you call us) are having a grand time being positive and happy. At the end of the day, you're just a hungry dog scratching at the door, and guess what? You can't come in.

    My opinion is nothing compared to likes of Getafix who can't help but slag off Skyfall and has done for the last 3 years and constantly pops up in threads to repeat the same old argument like a broken record.

    I assure you I'l get over it soon enough but sorry some of us saw through the dodgy plot, terrible back story and the 2 lamest set pieces of the Craig era, I slightly prefer it it to QOS but the climax to that film was 10 times better than the underwhelming desert sequence and the disappointing MI6 set piece.

    Like Birdleson said when you remove the homages and that terrific PTS from it, it not like there is much there. It's pretty cold and empty lacking any danger or thrill. It's a pity because the Mr White scene is great and also the L'American scene and the train fight apart from Hinx's only bit of dialogue seems totally out of character.

    It also seems that the Skyfall detractors like it just because it's got the homages and Craig is playing confident Bond, it's a pity a terrific Craig performance is shackled to such an underwhelming product
    .

    @Shardlake, see, THIS is what I've wanted to see from you for a helluva time now. I hear so many people going on about how SP is bad without giving any kind of fleshed out arguments. Here, you did just that.

    Like I've said before, whether it's you, @Birdleson or @Getafix, I don't care what your views are, love or hate. What upsets me is when people feel underwhelmed by something and almost make it their unconscious mission to ruin the fun for everyone else by stating the same negative declarations over and over again (I hate this, this is the worst Bond film yet) in every thread without giving any reasons for why they actually feel that way.

    What you've done here by supplying your reasons for how it is underwhelming for you can actually create a discourse, and not a flame war. My hat is off to you sir, and I'm sorry for any animosity you may have felt thrown in your direction.

    No offense taken, Merry Christmas.
  • Well I was going to wait until the Spectre bluray came out to switch movies but it looks like you guys took care of it already.
  • Posts: 9,847
    it dawned on me we never did Things we learned from Casino Royale 1954 so.. Maybe we could do that

  • Posts: 5,994
    We never did CR '67 either, IIRC. And there are quite a few things we have learned from this one as well.
  • Posts: 9,847
    yeah we should do both other Casino Royale's and then move on to maybe the video games next? if we are talking previous gen (ps2) we could have a few more things

    list of things I learned from that we could do (avoiding the film based one like from Russia with love or quantum)

    1. Casino Royale 54
    2. Casino Royale 67
    3. Agent under Fire
    4. Night Fire
    5. Everything or Nothing
    6. Goldeneye Rogue Agent
    7. Bloodstone
    8. Goldeneye (the Daniel Craig Version)


    Ok not a lot I grant you but it could keep the game going for another month or two.

    however if we widen the gap too lost bond films similar to Bond 17

    1. James Bond of the Secret Service (the proposed script from the 70's with Sharks with rockets on them I believe)
    2. Diamonds Aren't Forever (with Lazenby as JB in Alfred Hitcock presents)
    3. The Death Collector (based on the leaks the way bond 24 could of turned out)
    4. Risico (the lost bond 22 based on recent interview with vesper having a secret kid etc)
    5. James bond Jr (we could do the series or just a few episodes)

    we could also do the post Fleming Novels (not counting the novelizations of course) starting with Colonel Sun and moving through the Gardner benson and recent groups which would then give us

    1. Colonel Sun
    2. Licence Renewed
    3. For Special Services
    4. Icebreaker
    5. Role of Honour
    6. Nobody Lives for Ever
    7. No Deals, Mr. Bond
    8. Scorpius
    9. Win, Lose or Die
    10. Brokenclaw
    11. The Man from Barbarossa
    12. Death is Forever
    13. Never Send Flowers (which I alone will have a field day with because really euro Disney is where the climax is!)
    14. SeaFire (which so far is the best John Gardner book I have ever read)
    15. Cold
    16. Zero Minus Ten
    17. The Facts of Death
    18. High time to Kill
    19. DoubleShot
    20. Never Dream of Dying
    21. The Man with the Red Tattoo
    22. SilverFin
    23. Blood Fever
    24. Double or Die
    25. Hurricane Gold
    26. By Royal Command
    27. Devil May Care
    28. Carte Blanche
    29. Solo
    30. Trigger Mortis
    31. The Moneypenny Diaries: Guardian Angel
    32. Secret Servant: The Moneypenny Diaries
    33. The Moneypenny Diaries: Final Fling


    which could keep the game going pretty much for the rest of the year and perhaps even into next year we also have the 4 part mini series Fleming the man who would be bond from I believe 2013 and I am sure I can find other thing we could do but again all of this is up to the creator of the game.

    We shall see. But he did give me Bond 17 (the lost Dalton film) as a bday preasdent I believe or maybe wedding anyways perhaps our host will be so gracious as to take head of at least a few of my ideas presented as there is still so much to learn from 007 (again Eurodisney as the climax what were you just hoping for a free family holiday if you put it in your book John Gardner?)

  • Posts: 9,847
    I have decided to do my own things I Leander from casino Royale 1954 if others want to respond great if not then well in 3-4 years from now we will just ressurect this thread with Bond 25

    Things I learned from Casino Royale 1954

    1. Gambling is dangerous
    2. Hosts of 1950's tv shows don't need to act or have personality
    3. James Bond is American
    4. Leiter is British
    5. Leiter doesn't know how to play cards
    6. Mathis is a woman
    7. Bond likes to be called Jimmy
    8. Le Chiffe knows who Jimmy is
    9. Bond likes to play loud music so no one can hear what he is saying
    10. Le Chiffe is happy Mathis made out with Bond
    11. Card games can be boring
    12. For an extremly amaerican sounding girl Valerie Mathis is in French intellignece?????
    13. From behind all women look the same
    14. Smersh agents are extremly friendly on the phone
    15. No one is after James Bond's autograph


    That is about it I have like 20 more but I figure I will wait.
  • edited July 2016 Posts: 12
    A Couple Of Nuggets from The Spy Who Loved Me

    Admiral Hargreaves from TSWLM later becomes M in OP (1983). George Baker makes a second appearance in TSWLM but as a Captain only to be told that the microfilm is classified. Surely if he has seen it, then it is no longer classified?
  • 43 In the 60s, aeroplanes were operated by strings in the sky.
    So were Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet. Are we sure that the late Gerry Anderson wasn't technical adviser?
  • Posts: 4,325
    A Couple Of Nuggets from The Spy Who Loved Me

    Admiral Hargreaves from TSWLM later becomes M in OP (1983). George Baker makes a second appearance in TSWLM but as a Captain only to be told that the microfilm is classified. Surely if he has seen it, then it is no longer classified?

    TSWLM was George Baker's third Bond film - he appears in YOLT as a NASA engineer, OHMSS as Sir Hilary Bray and TSWLM as Captain Benson.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    I thought Bond tells him the infomation of where the microfilm came from
    was classified ?
  • stagstag In the thick of it!
    Posts: 1,053
    45) Things we've learned from Spectre? How not to run an international crime syndicate. Every scheme they come up with gets foiled!
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    stag wrote: »
    45) Things we've learned from Spectre? How not to run an international crime syndicate. Every scheme they come up with gets foiled!

    How so? The six or seven operations they name off at the Rome meeting would still be in effect even after Blofeld's fall from grace, and their biggest plan, Nine Eyes, was just seconds away from being a success.

    The only reason things came to failure was because Blofeld took things personal and alerted Bond to his work. With another person running SPECTRE who could tame their rage, who knows the destruction they could cause and profit they could net from a vulnerable and unknowing world.
Sign In or Register to comment.