It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I would have expected this type of reply from a member, not a moderator, who should be neutral and objective at all times. Also, Creasy47 had already settled this and you basically override his authority with your condescending tone regarding a potential Bond: "This exaggerated affection for what's-his-name Turner was cute at first and came close to a serious man-crush"
Respected member or not, within the context of the solution it was out of line. Also, just like everyone else in here you could have PMed this, instead of going the route you chose and again was disapproved by Creasy47. You (and others) have made your point in a highly condescending way. Keep up the good work. And yes, that was sarcasm. Hierarchy in forums is so pre 2005. I reckon some people are more equal than others. Way to go.
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1/community-terms-conditions-of-use
I think @GideonBond has signaled several attempts to draw a line under matters. How can he possibly do more than that, without altering his views to meet with the forums liking? It seems like a pound of flesh is needed before some are satisfied.
This is not a democracy or anything.
Also, you shouldn't talk about why I addressed you in this or that manner, but instead about why I didn't do so sooner. I am neutral when it comes to people expressing their opinion but I'm not when respected members like @4EverBonded are being insulted by a newcomer. You complain about my condescending tone; I guess I took some lessons from this thread these last couple of days.
The moderators have already read those comments and they were obviously said in jest. How is this not obvious to you? Unlike "respected" members who threaten and accuse like there is no tomorrow. The only thing you are doing is stirring the pot even more. Talking about pots, this is starting to look like James Bond: The Witch Trials of Salem edition. I will defend myself if I'm constantly being attacked.
All your points have been taken into account, as they were with Creasy47. I've addressed you in a civil manner thus far and I expect that from everyone else as well. Whether or not you agree with me, I feel certain members (including yourself) haven't done that. This is very much a democracy, mind you. We are equals here, however there are indeed rules. Rules have been breached from both sides. Acknowledged. Perhaps it's time to move on, because I could go on all night and honestly I do have better things to do.
I can if you'd like? ;) He's adorable. Not that I'd want him as Bond, mind...
---
So true. - Also: thanks for the laughs earlier.
And thank you, Dimi and Murdock.
I can't actually believe mods aren't reprimanding you for obvious trolling. A sight to behold.
That looks really good. Well done @dalton. :-bd
Photoshop is not my forte, but I thought it turned out reasonably well, even if its' just a simple swapping out Roger Moore's head for Friend's. ;)
I think I'd be lying if I said I hadn't done it the small handful of times I've used power tools.
You're welcome. It came out splendidly. I wouldn't mind seeing Friend as Bond either from that pic.
Very nice!! Send that to BB, stat!!!!
I'll get right on that. ;) :)
No, no good IMHO. His weasel face is offputting. He looks like he's permanently sneering. Does any woman find him sexy? And no-one called Rupert can ever be cool.
So you're telling me Rupert Murdoch did all that just to compensate for something? ;-)
I'm not convinced either. I must say, I haven't seen any actors mentioned here that I could see play Bond sadly. BB and MGW have a really hard job if Daniel quits. Then agian, nobody expected them to come up with Dan in the first place, so there's still hope.
I would doubt that.
Bell is wearing high heels in this film. Agreed, Defiance is class.
I think the confidence he shows on screen would be a big plus. There's a scene in Homeland where he's explaining to a room of bureaucrats why their Middle Eastern strategy is ineffective that I thought he was especially good in. I think that if he bulked up just a bit (not to the extent that Craig did but just enough to bring a bit of physical menace to the part to accompany the acting chops he's displayed on Homeland), that he could be a solid successor to Craig.
He also looks a bit younger than he actually is, so that could help on the longevity front while not forcing EON into casting a 20-something to take over.
Just my .02 cents though. Doubt he gets it, but, like Cavill, he does have the previous experience with EON that previous Bonds have had prior to casting working in his favor.
That he does, and all three (Craig, Schreiber, and Bell) share wonderful chemistry together as brothers. Very fine WWII film.
hand out some discipline.