It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It might be part of Soderbergh's experimental release plan for LL.
He's not the star of the film or the biggest star in it.
You think Channing Tatum is more famous than Dan?
I'd love it but he's too busy and maybe too associated with other franchises now.
Sadly yes. At least a more bankable star.
I'm attempting to give the front page a bit of a facelift by color coding. Any thoughts on how I should go about doing this? I've started by bolding each piece of "official" news (you'll notice the single bolded news item under July 2017).
Hey hello! Welcome newbie ;-).
Personally, I hope they go for Daniel Pemberton.
I'll settle for DA back but if Holmes got the gig that would be much more exciting.
Pemberton would be really great. U.N.C.L.E and The Game were both brilliant.
I used to frequent this forum 5 years back. No newbie haha. Glad to see you still around Gustav
Green-official
Yellow or orange-uncertain
Red-debunked
I like it.
Yes- good idea.
If these three really are the finalists for the director's chair, can we glean what direction EON is headed in with the next film? I'm surmising that it will be more down to earth and gritty. Thoughts?
---
Also, regarding no press junket for Logan Lucky, does that mean anything? How irregular or regular is this in the industry? It applies to all the actors I'm surmising? Presumably they can still go on talk shows and promote themselves.
Given Kings is having its premiere at the Toronto Film Festival, I am assuming that some press will have to be done there.
Seconded.
Not sure what to do with items like this:
"Daniel Craig confirms in an interview he has no plans for the next 2 years, but is considering some theater work in NY, opening up the possibility for another 3 year gap."
I wouldn't be mad if Arnold came back but this is kind of the problem I have with EoN and many Bond fans for the most part, the inability to move on. It's always bring Brosnan back, bring Arnold back and EoN keep bringing back P + W despite them having supposedly "moved on" after SF only to be brought back again for the SP. Things will never progress creatively if more effort isn't put into looking at new people. Fortunately the apparent director shortlist imo is the best piece of news for a Bond film in years which as exciting as it is, is also quite sad. In any case the Bond films going forward are in desperate need of being overhauled. Respect the legacy and make worthy successor films that remind audiences why Bond is THE business in the first place.
I wouldn't count it as official news since actors and the like don't often give useful information in interviews, and are usually very nonspecific and vague. I wouldn't necessarily class it as uncertain either. I say leave such info in plain text.