No Time to Die production thread

112131517181208

Comments

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    I’m not conviced Malek’s character will be striving to take on the role of No.1 - primarily because I’m not sure the audience would care.

    However, I’d be up for him being a ruthless ex-member who in the intervening years has formed a new organisation, built from the ashes of the old Spectre - gives us a fresh threat, while maintaining a connective thread.
  • Posts: 24
    Jamaica, Cuba, England, Scotland (according to a recent rumour), Norway, Italy + another location Matera could be standing in for.... aaand my headache is back! Would it have been that difficult to come up with a compelling story that takes place entirely in Jamaica?

    When was Scotland rumored?
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 4,619
    naplogic wrote: »
    Jamaica, Cuba, England, Scotland (according to a recent rumour), Norway, Italy + another location Matera could be standing in for.... aaand my headache is back! Would it have been that difficult to come up with a compelling story that takes place entirely in Jamaica?

    When was Scotland rumored?
    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/james-bond-goes-back-roots-14836656
  • Posts: 1,165
    If Blofeld does return I think it would be a wise move for all involved to not have the script make any reference to the brother angle. We really don't need to hear of that again. Just carry on without it.
  • Posts: 24
    naplogic wrote: »
    Jamaica, Cuba, England, Scotland (according to a recent rumour), Norway, Italy + another location Matera could be standing in for.... aaand my headache is back! Would it have been that difficult to come up with a compelling story that takes place entirely in Jamaica?

    When was Scotland rumored?
    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/james-bond-goes-back-roots-14836656

    Not sure I love retreading ground already covered in Skyfall, and so soon. The Scotland scenes in that movie were the best part.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    Why can't Blofeld and Malek be completely unrelated Character would love to see multiple villians , I mean look at Game of thrones they have two Villians Night king and cersei both completely unrelated but still has some connectivity. Cersei also had some fear from the dead and Night king even if she betrays the living. May be Malek also had some fear from Blofeld but he won't be there for much longer.
  • Posts: 1,499
    RC7 wrote: »
    I’m not conviced Malek’s character will be striving to take on the role of No.1 - primarily because I’m not sure the audience would care.

    However, I’d be up for him being a ruthless ex-member who in the intervening years has formed a new organisation, built from the ashes of the old Spectre - gives us a fresh threat, while maintaining a connective thread.

    I think the potentially interesting thing would be how Blofeld would react to being left to rot in prison and any power he clings onto is being drained away by Malek and the new Spectre. In a way Blofeld - with half his face burned away, his single eye bulging with hatred toward Bond - could become quite a tragic and broken figure.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    edited May 2019 Posts: 3,497
    Getafix wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    That's really a shame IMO. Have no interest in seeing Bond ' in Cuba ' again. If they want to set the film in Cuba go to Cuba.
    Jamaica has friendly but not especially close relations with Cuba. They are close neighbours but are linguistically and culturally very far apart.
    How many times has Bond visited Cuba now? GE. DAD.

    And how many time has he visited Italy?

    Or France?

    Yes but when he visits France and Italy they shoot there.

    I'm not keen on repeated visits to a country where they know they cannot shoot and always use other locations to double for it.

    Cuba is a great country with amazing locations - hopefully one day Bond will really get to shoot there. Imagine Bond actually on location in Havana?!

    That has always happened.

    At least Jamaica is partially used as Jamaica.

    Imagine they turn Materna into St Petersburg.

    Exactly. At least they shot GE in St Petersburg.

    Imagine if they repeatedly used (say) China as a location but never shot there. In SF I think they did at least send the second unit to the actual country even if Craig never set foot in China.

    Only 2 seconds of what you see is the actual St. Petersburg.

    The Brosnan era's "location dubbing" was ten times worse than DC's.

    Just check this out:

    http://movie-locations.com/movies/g/Goldeneye.php
  • Posts: 678
    RC7 wrote: »
    I’m not conviced Malek’s character will be striving to take on the role of No.1 - primarily because I’m not sure the audience would care.

    However, I’d be up for him being a ruthless ex-member who in the intervening years has formed a new organisation, built from the ashes of the old Spectre - gives us a fresh threat, while maintaining a connective thread.
    I agree with this.
  • Posts: 842
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    That's really a shame IMO. Have no interest in seeing Bond ' in Cuba ' again. If they want to set the film in Cuba go to Cuba.
    Jamaica has friendly but not especially close relations with Cuba. They are close neighbours but are linguistically and culturally very far apart.
    How many times has Bond visited Cuba now? GE. DAD.

    And how many time has he visited Italy?

    Or France?

    Yes but when he visits France and Italy they shoot there.

    I'm not keen on repeated visits to a country where they know they cannot shoot and always use other locations to double for it.

    Cuba is a great country with amazing locations - hopefully one day Bond will really get to shoot there. Imagine Bond actually on location in Havana?!

    That has always happened.

    At least Jamaica is partially used as Jamaica.

    Imagine they turn Materna into St Petersburg.

    Exactly. At least they shot GE in St Petersburg.

    Imagine if they repeatedly used (say) China as a location but never shot there. In SF I think they did at least send the second unit to the actual country even if Craig never set foot in China.

    Only 2 seconds of what you see is the actual St. Petersburg.

    The Brosnan era's "location dubbing" was ten times worse than DC's.

    Just check this out:

    http://movie-locations.com/movies/g/Goldeneye.php

    Worth noting, however unrelated, that the Langham is an absolutely wonderful hotel to this day. One of my personal favourites.
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    edited May 2019 Posts: 1,165
    Why can't Blofeld and Malek be completely unrelated Character would love to see multiple villians , I mean look at Game of thrones they have two Villians Night king and cersei both completely unrelated but still has some connectivity. Cersei also had some fear from the dead and Night king even if she betrays the living. May be Malek also had some fear from Blofeld but he won't be there for much longer.

    That would be a neat concept to work with. A conflict between two villains, and Bond caught in the middle.
  • Posts: 128
    This might be an unpopular opinion but I think I'd prefer if they completely ignored SPECTRE and the Blofeld storyline for B25. By the time this film is released it will have been nearly five full years since SPECTRE and I don't think the general movie-going public will remember or really care whether the story threads from that film are picked up again. Yes, I know B25 will at least in part reference the last film since Madeleine is back, but I hope that's the extent of it.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    I can see Blofeld being a non factor but based on what is known about the story and continuity, SPECTRE, or the ghost of that organization, will come into play.
  • Posts: 3,333
    I think you're forgetting how incredibly media savvy young audiences are @coco1997. Just look at the popularity of fan theory blogs and showbiz news shows on places like Youtube and elsewhere. Whether that be Game of Thrones, Star Wars, Marvel movies, or pretty much anything mainstream—between them they get millions of views. It wouldn't take much for one of these popular fan blogs to have a recap before B25 comes out. There's a lot of moviegoers that are extremely anal retentive and pore over the minutiae of a movie before and after seeing it. For instance, if the current writers were to get something wrong that appeared in Spectre and was left out of B25, then they'd be all over it like a rash, pointing out the inconsistencies and its flaws. Besides, what do future moviegoers really need to know that can't be summed up with a light, liberal sprinkling of dialogue at the start of the new movie? It's not like Bond movies are extremely complex to understand.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    edited May 2019 Posts: 6,382
    bondsum wrote: »
    I think you're forgetting how incredibly media savvy young audiences are @coco1997. Just look at the popularity of fan theory blogs and showbiz news shows on places like Youtube and elsewhere. Whether that be Game of Thrones, Star Wars, Marvel movies, or pretty much anything mainstream—between them they get millions of views. It wouldn't take much for one of these popular fan blogs to have a recap before B25 comes out. There's a lot of moviegoers that are extremely anal retentive and pore over the minutiae of a movie before and after seeing it. For instance, if the current writers were to get something wrong that appeared in Spectre and was left out of B25, then they'd be all over it like a rash, pointing out the inconsistencies and its flaws. Besides, what do future moviegoers really need to know that can't be summed up with a light, liberal sprinkling of dialogue at the start of the new movie? It's not like Bond movies are extremely complex to understand.

    I don't think Babs and especially (lawyer) MGW fought McClory all those decades to buy back the rights to Blofeld...and then never to use the character again.

    Logan made this mistake, killing Blofeld in his script. If FRWL-DAF meant anything, it's this: they. just. won't. kill. Blofeld. Exception: FYEO, when they thought the rights were forever gone. It's wishful fan thinking to get rid of Blofeld.

    The unused TSWLM opening, where the next generation of "young turks" came in and assassinated Blofeld, I could see working in B25. But even in that scenario, I'd think they'd show an inkling of life left in Blofeld.

    If they were to kill Blofeld--they won't--they'll end the timeline and bring him back in a reboot.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    If Cuba is in the film (but filmed in Jamaica) I don't mind at all; just give me a good story told in a visually exciting, beautiful way. Which I think we will get.

    Blofeld ... I don't care to think too far along lines of speculation; I do want to be fresh for the story when I see it in the theater. But with Spectre ending like it did, I think of course they have to have him in it to tie it off - whether that means bulk of more Blofeld is for left for Bond 26 and the new Bond actor to grapple with, or not. EON has rights to the character, a main villain in the Bond canon, and they will use Blofeld. Personally, I'd like only a little in this one. There are many possible ways to do so. Same for Madeline - many possible ways to use her in this particular story. I'm not concerned.

    Love the photos. It does have a relaxed, classic Bond feel, what I'm seeing.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    edited May 2019 Posts: 1,003
    Two things...

    I see A LOT of people saying that’s the same yacht from Casino Royale. It is NOT. Bond isn’t wealthy enough to purchase a yacht is he?

    Didn’t someone find out his Bond character was bringing in $60,000 a year? Something a long those lines?

    I figure if he retires he gets some money from that also but you gotta be a millionaire to even own a yacht don’t you?



    Rami Malek theory...

    “Before Blofeld was captured he was involved with a man named blah blah.. He was someone who came under our radar but we didn’t think he was a threat. “

    Breaks Blofeld out. Uses him to kidnap Madeline and lure Bond to their lair. Malek shoots Blofeld in the head. Boom.

    That would make Malek really terrifying. He played a terrorist in 24. Honestly wasn’t super convinced at first but he has come a long way. I think he can definitely be terrifying and menancing..

    He is about 5’7 and 135 pounds. Greene wasn’t close to the terrifying creepy Mads or Silva but him and Blofeld were good villains. Definitely creepy enough to be believable that they are running a criminal organization..

    Hopefully Malek can pull this off. I think 90% of the film relies on if Malek can pull the villain role off and how good the writing is.

    I am not worried about anyone else but Malek. If Malek delivers a crappy performance expect a crappy movie.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    Malek has the chops to be one whacked-out psycho... If Waltz comes back, I hope it's so that, for whatever reason, Malek's character BREAKS INTO THE PRISON that holds Blofeld, and murders him in some sadistic fashion.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    peter wrote: »
    Malek has the chops to be one whacked-out psycho... If Waltz comes back, I hope it's so that, for whatever reason, Malek's character BREAKS INTO THE PRISON that holds Blofeld, and murders him in some sadistic fashion.

    I think it would be hilarious and awesome if Malek just shot him in the head. Like it was nothing.

    Keep in mind for over 10 years Blofeld was responsible for everything.. Malek just breaks him out and kills him like he’s an average guy.

    That would really elevate his villainy.

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Two things...

    I see A LOT of people saying that’s the same yacht from Casino Royale. It is NOT. Bond isn’t wealthy enough to purchase a yacht is he?

    Didn’t someone find out his Bond character was bringing in $60,000 a year? Something a long those lines?

    I figure if he retires he gets some money from that also but you gotta be a millionaire to even own a yacht don’t you?



    Rami Malek theory...

    “Before Blofeld was captured he was involved with a man named blah blah.. He was someone who came under our radar but we didn’t think he was a threat. “

    Breaks Blofeld out. Uses him to kidnap Madeline and lure Bond to their lair. Malek shoots Blofeld in the head. Boom.

    That would make Malek really terrifying. He played a terrorist in 24. Honestly wasn’t super convinced at first but he has come a long way. I think he can definitely be terrifying and menancing..

    He is about 5’7 and 135 pounds. Greene wasn’t close to the terrifying creepy Mads or Silva but him and Blofeld were good villains. Definitely creepy enough to be believable that they are running a criminal organization..

    Hopefully Malek can pull this off. I think 90% of the film relies on if Malek can pull the villain role off and how good the writing is.

    I am not worried about anyone else but Malek. If Malek delivers a crappy performance expect a crappy movie.
    Bond doesn’t live off of his pension or professional salary. I think this was carried over from the books when Bond was left with a trust fund when his parents died and as such comes from a wealthy family.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited May 2019 Posts: 8,252
    peter wrote: »
    Malek has the chops to be one whacked-out psycho... If Waltz comes back, I hope it's so that, for whatever reason, Malek's character BREAKS INTO THE PRISON that holds Blofeld, and murders him in some sadistic fashion.

    Mendes had a penchant for villains who had a “kooky “ side; while Silva was , just barely, able to overcome this, Blofeld was completely undermined by that trait.
    This time around I want an adversary who’s intimidating, deadly , elegant and all business.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,382
    Two things...

    I see A LOT of people saying that’s the same yacht from Casino Royale. It is NOT. Bond isn’t wealthy enough to purchase a yacht is he?

    Didn’t someone find out his Bond character was bringing in $60,000 a year? Something a long those lines?

    I figure if he retires he gets some money from that also but you gotta be a millionaire to even own a yacht don’t you?

    Rami Malek theory...

    “Before Blofeld was captured he was involved with a man named blah blah.. He was someone who came under our radar but we didn’t think he was a threat. “

    Breaks Blofeld out. Uses him to kidnap Madeline and lure Bond to their lair. Malek shoots Blofeld in the head. Boom.

    That would make Malek really terrifying. He played a terrorist in 24. Honestly wasn’t super convinced at first but he has come a long way. I think he can definitely be terrifying and menancing..

    He is about 5’7 and 135 pounds. Greene wasn’t close to the terrifying creepy Mads or Silva but him and Blofeld were good villains. Definitely creepy enough to be believable that they are running a criminal organization..

    Hopefully Malek can pull this off. I think 90% of the film relies on if Malek can pull the villain role off and how good the writing is.

    I am not worried about anyone else but Malek. If Malek delivers a crappy performance expect a crappy movie.
    Bond doesn’t live off of his pension or professional salary. I think this was carried over from the books when Bond was left with a trust fund when his parents died and as such comes from a wealthy family.

    Was this in the books?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    echo wrote: »
    Two things...

    I see A LOT of people saying that’s the same yacht from Casino Royale. It is NOT. Bond isn’t wealthy enough to purchase a yacht is he?

    Didn’t someone find out his Bond character was bringing in $60,000 a year? Something a long those lines?

    I figure if he retires he gets some money from that also but you gotta be a millionaire to even own a yacht don’t you?

    Rami Malek theory...

    “Before Blofeld was captured he was involved with a man named blah blah.. He was someone who came under our radar but we didn’t think he was a threat. “

    Breaks Blofeld out. Uses him to kidnap Madeline and lure Bond to their lair. Malek shoots Blofeld in the head. Boom.

    That would make Malek really terrifying. He played a terrorist in 24. Honestly wasn’t super convinced at first but he has come a long way. I think he can definitely be terrifying and menancing..

    He is about 5’7 and 135 pounds. Greene wasn’t close to the terrifying creepy Mads or Silva but him and Blofeld were good villains. Definitely creepy enough to be believable that they are running a criminal organization..

    Hopefully Malek can pull this off. I think 90% of the film relies on if Malek can pull the villain role off and how good the writing is.

    I am not worried about anyone else but Malek. If Malek delivers a crappy performance expect a crappy movie.
    Bond doesn’t live off of his pension or professional salary. I think this was carried over from the books when Bond was left with a trust fund when his parents died and as such comes from a wealthy family.

    Was this in the books?
    Yes.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    Two things...

    I see A LOT of people saying that’s the same yacht from Casino Royale. It is NOT. Bond isn’t wealthy enough to purchase a yacht is he?

    Didn’t someone find out his Bond character was bringing in $60,000 a year? Something a long those lines?

    I figure if he retires he gets some money from that also but you gotta be a millionaire to even own a yacht don’t you?



    Rami Malek theory...

    “Before Blofeld was captured he was involved with a man named blah blah.. He was someone who came under our radar but we didn’t think he was a threat. “

    Breaks Blofeld out. Uses him to kidnap Madeline and lure Bond to their lair. Malek shoots Blofeld in the head. Boom.

    That would make Malek really terrifying. He played a terrorist in 24. Honestly wasn’t super convinced at first but he has come a long way. I think he can definitely be terrifying and menancing..

    He is about 5’7 and 135 pounds. Greene wasn’t close to the terrifying creepy Mads or Silva but him and Blofeld were good villains. Definitely creepy enough to be believable that they are running a criminal organization..

    Hopefully Malek can pull this off. I think 90% of the film relies on if Malek can pull the villain role off and how good the writing is.

    I am not worried about anyone else but Malek. If Malek delivers a crappy performance expect a crappy movie.
    He won't.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    Minion wrote: »
    Why can't Blofeld and Malek be completely unrelated Character would love to see multiple villians , I mean look at Game of thrones they have two Villians Night king and cersei both completely unrelated but still has some connectivity. Cersei also had some fear from the dead and Night king even if she betrays the living. May be Malek also had some fear from Blofeld but he won't be there for much longer.

    That would be a neat concept to work with. A conflict between two villains, and Bond caught in the middle.

    I trust CJF and think that he can work this very well.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited May 2019 Posts: 4,537
    Then there are with 5, you have the CIA too and Bond other side.

    Mabey Rami Malek play a three side person villian (mabey even four), then mabey it be easier to accepted Bond is a three side of person too. From studio that brought you Split, The Bourne Identity and Mission Impossible: Fall Out.

    hqdefault.jpg
    Her name is Vesper. The bullet in Bond. Time to get it out.
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 3,333
    echo wrote: »
    bondsum wrote: »
    I think you're forgetting how incredibly media savvy young audiences are @coco1997. Just look at the popularity of fan theory blogs and showbiz news shows on places like Youtube and elsewhere. Whether that be Game of Thrones, Star Wars, Marvel movies, or pretty much anything mainstream—between them they get millions of views. It wouldn't take much for one of these popular fan blogs to have a recap before B25 comes out. There's a lot of moviegoers that are extremely anal retentive and pore over the minutiae of a movie before and after seeing it. For instance, if the current writers were to get something wrong that appeared in Spectre and was left out of B25, then they'd be all over it like a rash, pointing out the inconsistencies and its flaws. Besides, what do future moviegoers really need to know that can't be summed up with a light, liberal sprinkling of dialogue at the start of the new movie? It's not like Bond movies are extremely complex to understand.

    I don't think Babs and especially (lawyer) MGW fought McClory all those decades to buy back the rights to Blofeld...and then never to use the character again.

    Logan made this mistake, killing Blofeld in his script. If FRWL-DAF meant anything, it's this: they. just. won't. kill. Blofeld. Exception: FYEO, when they thought the rights were forever gone. It's wishful fan thinking to get rid of Blofeld.

    The unused TSWLM opening, where the next generation of "young turks" came in and assassinated Blofeld, I could see working in B25. But even in that scenario, I'd think they'd show an inkling of life left in Blofeld.

    If they were to kill Blofeld--they won't--they'll end the timeline and bring him back in a reboot.
    I don't disagree. It's what my post is eluding to. A 4 our 5 year gap won't prevent Eon from having connections to its previous movie, nor more than say Marvel's Engame did with its 2014 Captain America: The Winter Soldier.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    bondsum wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    bondsum wrote: »
    I think you're forgetting how incredibly media savvy young audiences are @coco1997. Just look at the popularity of fan theory blogs and showbiz news shows on places like Youtube and elsewhere. Whether that be Game of Thrones, Star Wars, Marvel movies, or pretty much anything mainstream—between them they get millions of views. It wouldn't take much for one of these popular fan blogs to have a recap before B25 comes out. There's a lot of moviegoers that are extremely anal retentive and pore over the minutiae of a movie before and after seeing it. For instance, if the current writers were to get something wrong that appeared in Spectre and was left out of B25, then they'd be all over it like a rash, pointing out the inconsistencies and its flaws. Besides, what do future moviegoers really need to know that can't be summed up with a light, liberal sprinkling of dialogue at the start of the new movie? It's not like Bond movies are extremely complex to understand.

    I don't think Babs and especially (lawyer) MGW fought McClory all those decades to buy back the rights to Blofeld...and then never to use the character again.

    Logan made this mistake, killing Blofeld in his script. If FRWL-DAF meant anything, it's this: they. just. won't. kill. Blofeld. Exception: FYEO, when they thought the rights were forever gone. It's wishful fan thinking to get rid of Blofeld.

    The unused TSWLM opening, where the next generation of "young turks" came in and assassinated Blofeld, I could see working in B25. But even in that scenario, I'd think they'd show an inkling of life left in Blofeld.

    If they were to kill Blofeld--they won't--they'll end the timeline and bring him back in a reboot.
    I don't disagree. It's what my post is eluding to. A 4 our 5 year gap won't prevent Eon from having connections to its previous movie, nor more than say Marvel's Engame did with its 2014 Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

    I can see the complaining already. Waltz portrayal of Blofeld was dull and all, almost everyone agrees. Even he himself.

    I LIKE TEH BOND 25. BUT WHERE WAS DA ERNST IN DIS MOVIE? DA MALEK NOT OLDE ENOUGH.

  • Posts: 22
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    bondsum wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    bondsum wrote: »
    I think you're forgetting how incredibly media savvy young audiences are @coco1997. Just look at the popularity of fan theory blogs and showbiz news shows on places like Youtube and elsewhere. Whether that be Game of Thrones, Star Wars, Marvel movies, or pretty much anything mainstream—between them they get millions of views. It wouldn't take much for one of these popular fan blogs to have a recap before B25 comes out. There's a lot of moviegoers that are extremely anal retentive and pore over the minutiae of a movie before and after seeing it. For instance, if the current writers were to get something wrong that appeared in Spectre and was left out of B25, then they'd be all over it like a rash, pointing out the inconsistencies and its flaws. Besides, what do future moviegoers really need to know that can't be summed up with a light, liberal sprinkling of dialogue at the start of the new movie? It's not like Bond movies are extremely complex to understand.

    I don't think Babs and especially (lawyer) MGW fought McClory all those decades to buy back the rights to Blofeld...and then never to use the character again.

    Logan made this mistake, killing Blofeld in his script. If FRWL-DAF meant anything, it's this: they. just. won't. kill. Blofeld. Exception: FYEO, when they thought the rights were forever gone. It's wishful fan thinking to get rid of Blofeld.

    The unused TSWLM opening, where the next generation of "young turks" came in and assassinated Blofeld, I could see working in B25. But even in that scenario, I'd think they'd show an inkling of life left in Blofeld.

    If they were to kill Blofeld--they won't--they'll end the timeline and bring him back in a reboot.
    I don't disagree. It's what my post is eluding to. A 4 our 5 year gap won't prevent Eon from having connections to its previous movie, nor more than say Marvel's Engame did with its 2014 Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

    I can see the complaining already. Waltz portrayal of Blofeld was dull and all, almost everyone agrees. Even he himself.

    I LIKE TEH BOND 25. BUT WHERE WAS DA ERNST IN DIS MOVIE? DA MALEK NOT OLDE ENOUGH.

    What , are you Slavoj Zizek ?
  • edited May 2019 Posts: 832
    Waltz’s blofeld was cringeworthy. Among the worst villains of the series. At least Gray’s portrayal had personality.
Sign In or Register to comment.