Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1121512161217121812191221»

Comments

  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited September 25 Posts: 5,936
    bondywondy wrote: »
    [...] people won't care that much that Bond is technically dead! Bond 26 in 2027 should feel fresh.
    I don't think, at this point in time, that many people, if any, truly care that he died at the end of the last film or even remember, outside of die hard fans.

    As for Aaron Pierre, I agree with @Kodak007 @007HallY, I see him more as action hero than gentleman spy.
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    edited September 25 Posts: 1,609
    It's really alarming what some people would let pass as James Bond. Elordi gets everything wrong. Lazenby is hardly an argument for doing that sort of thing again.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    edited September 26 Posts: 654
    007HallY wrote: »
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Aaron Pierre was excellent in "Rebel Ridge", but not sure if he would be right for Bond. However, I think he would be great as Jack Reacher, for example.

    I haven’t seen him in much (I think he’s a really good actor incidentally from what I have seen of him). But I agree to an extent. Seems more like he’d play a great villain in a Bond movie rather than Bond to me.

    I’m happy to be proven wrong if he is picked though.

    Interesting. Are there any particular qualities that you feel are lacking, or that couldn't be developed?
    Denbigh wrote: »
    bondywondy wrote: »
    [...] people won't care that much that Bond is technically dead! Bond 26 in 2027 should feel fresh.
    I don't think, at this point in time, that many people, if any, truly care that he died at the end of the last film or even remember, outside of die hard fans.

    As for Aaron Pierre, I agree with @Kodak007 @007HallY, I see him more as action hero than gentleman spy.

    I see what you mean, but a lot of people probably would've said similar things about Connery back in '61. That he was too much of a rugged brute. But I think it's easier to mould a tough guy into a suave sophisticate than vice versa.
    LucknFate wrote: »
    It's really alarming what some people would let pass as James Bond. Elordi gets everything wrong. Lazenby is hardly an argument for doing that sort of thing again.

    I have to agree. He looks good and that's about it. And it's a shame we haven't moved on from casting white actors as Heathcliff when the character as described in the book is most likely not.
  • Posts: 3,856
    007HallY wrote: »
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Aaron Pierre was excellent in "Rebel Ridge", but not sure if he would be right for Bond. However, I think he would be great as Jack Reacher, for example.

    I haven’t seen him in much (I think he’s a really good actor incidentally from what I have seen of him). But I agree to an extent. Seems more like he’d play a great villain in a Bond movie rather than Bond to me.

    I’m happy to be proven wrong if he is picked though.

    Interesting. Are there any particular qualities that you feel are lacking, or that couldn't be developed?

    To be completely honest, I think it's because he's so damn muscular and has a very specific face (he's almost pretty, but at the same time very rugged). He's just ever so slightly different than what I tend to think of in relation to Bond.

    But like I said, I'm happy to be proven wrong. It's not out of the realm of possibility he could be cast.
  • edited September 26 Posts: 120
    im just glad we have a date to look forward too 2027 isn't too far away
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,163
    im just glad we have a date to look forward too 2027 isn't too far away

    Where has 2027 been officially announced?

  • Posts: 1,194
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Aaron Pierre was excellent in "Rebel Ridge", but not sure if he would be right for Bond. However, I think he would be great as Jack Reacher, for example.

    I haven’t seen him in much (I think he’s a really good actor incidentally from what I have seen of him). But I agree to an extent. Seems more like he’d play a great villain in a Bond movie rather than Bond to me.

    I’m happy to be proven wrong if he is picked though.

    Interesting. Are there any particular qualities that you feel are lacking, or that couldn't be developed?

    To be completely honest, I think it's because he's so damn muscular and has a very specific face (he's almost pretty, but at the same time very rugged). He's just ever so slightly different than what I tend to think of in relation to Bond.

    But like I said, I'm happy to be proven wrong. It's not out of the realm of possibility he could be cast.

    He has weird eyes.

    He's a bit of a black Jason Statham. Bondian but not in the right way.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited September 26 Posts: 8,352
    talos7 wrote: »
    im just glad we have a date to look forward too 2027 isn't too far away

    Where has 2027 been officially announced?

    Just people getting a little over zealous, my good man. There's still nothing to suggest that whatever was holding up development between January 2022 and now has been resolved.
  • edited September 26 Posts: 907
    Doomsday (2026)
    Secret War (May 2027)
    B26 (Summer '27)
    Star Wars (Dec 2027)

    Squeeze my first film in right between the action.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,352
    We aren't likely to see Bond 26 until 2028 unfortunately. Barbara is busy with othello and as Calvin Dyson points out they need some kind of plan in place because Micheal Wilson won't see out the next era as a main producer.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited September 26 Posts: 5,936
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Aaron Pierre was excellent in "Rebel Ridge", but not sure if he would be right for Bond. However, I think he would be great as Jack Reacher, for example.

    I haven’t seen him in much (I think he’s a really good actor incidentally from what I have seen of him). But I agree to an extent. Seems more like he’d play a great villain in a Bond movie rather than Bond to me.

    I’m happy to be proven wrong if he is picked though.

    Interesting. Are there any particular qualities that you feel are lacking, or that couldn't be developed?
    He's just ever so slightly different than what I tend to think of in relation to Bond.
    To try and possibly elaborate on your thoughts @007HallY as well as my own...

    James Bond isn't a model. He's handsome and desirable of course, but beautiful and unique, which are words I would happily describe Pierre as, isn't the character. Plus, mix that with the fact that he's quite large and muscular as well as tall (6'3"), I'd say this is what's holding me back from imagining Pierre in the role.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,268
    talos7 wrote: »
    im just glad we have a date to look forward too 2027 isn't too far away

    Where has 2027 been officially announced?

    Just people getting a little over zealous, my good man. There's still nothing to suggest that whatever was holding up development between January 2022 and now has been resolved.

    Care to take a bet on that? The equivalent of a hundred pounds? I’m good for it, 😂.
  • Posts: 3,856
    Denbigh wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Aaron Pierre was excellent in "Rebel Ridge", but not sure if he would be right for Bond. However, I think he would be great as Jack Reacher, for example.

    I haven’t seen him in much (I think he’s a really good actor incidentally from what I have seen of him). But I agree to an extent. Seems more like he’d play a great villain in a Bond movie rather than Bond to me.

    I’m happy to be proven wrong if he is picked though.

    Interesting. Are there any particular qualities that you feel are lacking, or that couldn't be developed?
    He's just ever so slightly different than what I tend to think of in relation to Bond.
    To try and possibly elaborate on your thoughts @007HallY as well as my own...

    James Bond isn't a model. He's handsome and desirable of course, but beautiful and unique, which are words I would happily describe Pierre as, isn't the character. Plus, mix that with the fact that he's quite large and muscular as well as tall (6'3"), I'd say this is what's holding me back from imagining Pierre in the role.

    Yeah, well said (better than I did). I think when someone is too good looking in that way and too tall/muscular as Pierre is, it takes something away from Bond. Bond should be a bit rough around the edges in many ways - good looking and physically fit no doubt, but not necessarily a model. It’s why I said I can more easily see Pierre as a villain.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,936
    007HallY wrote: »
    Denbigh wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Kojak007 wrote: »
    Aaron Pierre was excellent in "Rebel Ridge", but not sure if he would be right for Bond. However, I think he would be great as Jack Reacher, for example.

    I haven’t seen him in much (I think he’s a really good actor incidentally from what I have seen of him). But I agree to an extent. Seems more like he’d play a great villain in a Bond movie rather than Bond to me.

    I’m happy to be proven wrong if he is picked though.

    Interesting. Are there any particular qualities that you feel are lacking, or that couldn't be developed?
    He's just ever so slightly different than what I tend to think of in relation to Bond.
    To try and possibly elaborate on your thoughts @007HallY as well as my own...

    James Bond isn't a model. He's handsome and desirable of course, but beautiful and unique, which are words I would happily describe Pierre as, isn't the character. Plus, mix that with the fact that he's quite large and muscular as well as tall (6'3"), I'd say this is what's holding me back from imagining Pierre in the role.
    It’s why I said I can more easily see Pierre as a villain.
    100%, whether as the main villain or a henchman in the vein of Red Grant or Jaws, he'd bring a lot to a role like that based on what I have seen of him.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    edited September 26 Posts: 9,268
    I like Pierre a lot and can certainly see him being a strong candidate if they open up casting to include men of different skin tones.

    This kid has lots of talent and charisma. He also has edginess. He’s physically fit and although he has stunning eyes and is incredibly handsome, I don’t find him to be a model-type and his looks don’t overwhelm his over all performances.

    I’d say his handsomeness is on the same level as an ATJ/Theo James.

    And at thirty , he has great maturity and gravitas.

    Rebel Ridge was a flawed film, with a great set up (seemingly inspired by First Blood), but the script got in its own way and started to go in circles. But Pierre was an anchor and made it worth watching.

    FOE is another flawed film where he plays a very different character, but again, this kid filled the screen with his presence (and he did overpower Paul Mescal in it).

  • Posts: 15,028
    Jacob Elordi’s recent casting as Heathcliff is causing quite a stir on social media, and I can understand why. However, at the same time he seems like an ideal choice for a brooding, angst-ridden, Byronic hero—a role previously taken on by the likes of Ralph Fiennes and Timothy Dalton. Having now appeared in Saltburn, The Sweet East, Frankenstein, and soon in Wuthering Heights—all English characters—it feels like Elordi is naturally entering the conversation for Bond. Plus, with George Lazenby having already set the precedent, it wouldn’t be a stretch to have another Australian in the role.







    Really not sure about his face, but good observations. I'd rather they cast someone with these productions on his CV than, say, a Marvel movie. (And that's not a dig at ATJ).
Sign In or Register to comment.