It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I really loved it. Obviously I can't promise that you'll feel the same way, but the somewhat mixed reception it's been getting has genuinely surprised me. It's like The Spy Who Loved Me or Goldeneye, a full on return to the GF blueprint. It's much more classic Bond than any previous Craig film but at the same time, it contains tons of references to the past Daniel Craig films, which means that the shift towards the old Bond films feels like a natural progression. It never feels forced. And it does the classic Bond blueprint so well. It's weird, because while I admit it's actually more flawed than some other Bond films (which I rank lower), I just don't think I've ever enjoyed one as much as this. The acting, dialogue, cinematography, action, etc, were all great. It managed to deliver an old fashioned, epic Bond adventure while still being modern, relevant and containing some good character drama.
And above all, the whole thing is just a lot of fun, which is why in my opinion, it works much better than Skyfall (my previous favourite Craig era film) did. Even if you don't love it like I did, I think you'd have to try hard to not have a lot of fun watching it.
I did type a much more detailed review which is in a different thread, but it's full of spoilers so I won't post that here. But yeah I loved SP. It built on everything I loved about SF, and improved on everything I didn't like (no pretentiousness, more visceral/intense action, more gadgets, etc) to make a really, really good Bond film. Because that's what it focuses on more than anything else. Doesn't try to resolve big story arcs (although it does wrap up loose ends), or reboot the franchise, or really explore Bond's past or go for Oscars. More than anything, for the first time in years, the focus seems to have just been on delivering a great Bond film. And for me they more than succeeded.
It's what I like about SP as well. Personally I have it in my top ten, ahead of SF provisionally.
Lets see…at the moment
Casino Royale
Skyfall
SPECTRE
Quantum of Solace
That's probably pretty much it - can't see it overtaking Skyfall, which even for all it's plot contrivances seems to be the better film, certainly has better DoP.
Once I've found somewhere permanent to live (been kicked out of my house as the ex and kids are living there now) and have tv/blu-ray/5.1 set up I think I'll do a Bondathon and rate as I go.
I saw it again last night. It remains my number 10.
Excellent summary, @bondsum. I fully agree!
After few years this movie will be perceived differently. I think it will fall down on some lists.
Me too.
I truly struggle to watch SF or find positives past the tense PTS and fabulous Adele opening. It's all very nice to look at and DC is ok bit the actions of every character simply piss me off and I see little point watching a film to become agitated: what's the point?
2. O P
3. G E
4. C R
5. T LD
6. F R WL
7. FY E O
1. CR
(just a few feet below)
2. QoS
(just a few feet below)
3. SP
4. SF
Same … No. 2