It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
She could maybe be quite good if she was given a good film. Maybe another action franchise, who's latest film was really good and critically acclaimed (hint hint EON).
I'm tempted to give this new one a miss and just stick with the first 4. I suspect its going to be average at best.
God I hate the One Show it's pretty typical of what UK TV seems to be like these days, yes we still do make some quality programming but it seems few and far between these days.
I agree! Not just a few, but EVERY video has him speaking in a less than enthusiastic tone, like his throat is racked with an illness of some kind.
The One Show are supremely sycophantic, @Shardlake, the best way to ever describe the fools. I am sure the producers and crew had to help yank their lips off Bruce's arse so that he could leave the studio once the interview had concluded.
I don't like The One Show either. When Rog is on it its a bit more bearable though ;)
http://www.villagevoice.com/2013-02-13/film/A-Good-Day-to-Die-Hard/
Best Picture at the Oscars next year? I do think so!
But the thing that got me the most? There were 4 F bombs in the film. One of which was drowned out by a car engines roar. So why, oh why, was the one they drown out the one thats part of his catchphrase???
4 out of 10
Haha, I wonder how many Razzies it'll score?
None, because by that time there will be some "chickflic" they will want to insult because that seems fashionable to do.
I heard Movie 43 was abysmal. Like Mark Kermode, I want to know what the directors had on all those stars to get them to appear. I mean seriously, there is some great talent in there that really downgraded into what appears to be a vile and lack luster film.
Firstly, the film is flat out terribly shot. I didn't realize Russia had so many earthquakes, geez. This sans-tripod garbage has to end. Not only was it used (and subsequently ruined) the action sequences, but nearly every dialogue scene shakes all over the place. EVEN THE FINAL SHOT OF THE FILM IS IN SHAKEY SLOW MOTION. God almighty.
There was no clear villain, which was a big problem. Truth be told, the ONLY character in the film I was interested in was the carrot munching, dancer guy. Not sure what it was about him, but I was sure disappointed when he met his comeuppance so early on.
The plot. Ha.
I don't know what to say about Bruce Willis. The character of John McClane has been all but ruined with A Good Day to Die Hard. Can we even classify this as a Die Hard film? I don't think so, no. Maybe Pt. 6 will reveal this entry was a horrible radiation induced dream. That would be the only legitimate explanation for me.
Shame on all involved for green-lighting this giant piece of junk. I guess I won't have a complete Die Hard collection after all.
Crystal Skull raped Indy
Batman and Robin raped Batman
Die Another Day raped Bond
Does this film rape Die Hard?
Right where the sun don't shine.
This is quite funny. When even the geeky fanboys don't like it there's a problem
Nah can't agree here. One thing I did like about the film was that Willis was playing the Mcclane from the first 3 again instead of the more po faced hero from the 4th movie, and he seemed to be having fun.
Personally, as much as I liked when they first announced this film, it really should've ended with the fourth. There was a spec script floating around for a Die Hard sequel which had him visiting Jack at the Nakatomi Corporation in Tokyo and that would have felt far more natural than his son working for the CIA.
After 2 weeks Die Hard 5 delieverd $1,869,502. This comes more closer to the Boxoffice of Bourne Legacy. Die Hard 5 started with 100 screens in week 1 and keep those in Week 2, Bourne start with 97 and in the second week get a litle update to 98 screens. Die Hard 5 wins from Bourne at the moment, Bourne Legacy delieverd after 2 weeks $1,265,117 and $1,942,484 after 4.
Amen to that. A Director's Cut? Really? O I understand now. He's simply going to slow down the action more to make it a two hour exercise in boredom and annoyance.
As I wrote in the last movie you watched thread: generic film making this.