It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I wouldnt go that far lol. Im still looking forward to what is said to be the best bond film ever. Gun barrel just looses some excitment.
No, IMDB is just speculating up till the films launch.
Well put. :)
Shardlake, Bond is my life. I am that much of a fan, sorry if that seems stupid to you.
It's not only that, but hearing comments like 'weirdly dour movie', 'macabre main titles' and 'no gunbarrel at the start' sounds more like a movie from Christopher Nolan's revived Batman-saga.
I just wonder how much trendsetting the Bond producers want to be. Moreover, ever since Daniel Craig became the new Bond I sometimes have the feeling all the people involved in a Bond movie are trying a bit too hard to make the perfect Bond film.
It's not bad to have a bit of a formularic approach to a franchise film. 'Q' back? Fantastic. But not an old 'Q', but a young wizzkid. Well, I can accept that. But what's wrong with an older 'Q'? You just don't want to have it anymore, because it has been done for such a long time? I find that a lacklustre argument. Albert Finney would have played a marvellous 'Q' no?
Boycotting 'Skyfall'?? Bullocks. I will never do that :-). But you have to understand, Bond fans are fans. They are passionate.
You can still be a fan, but even so it's really no big deal, sure I'd like it too. But if it means that much you, you can always find one of those YouTube videos with all the gunbarrels and sit in a dark room on a loop? That may calm you.
Someone said on the forum its just a film, its not to me. Its more than a film when its bond. If you know what i mean.
It's just... why? Why bother moving it? There's literally no reason not to and they knew that most fans preferred it at the start anyway.
Like I've said, it won't ruin the film but it is a let down.
Exactly. Its done so well since dr no. Why change now. It should never ever change,
Ian Fleming will be turning in his grave. I just know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't think that is an unreasonable comment to make!
Well Fleming apparently hated Dr No so I'm not so sure about that.
Cubby Broccoli probably is though!
I'll probably enjoy the film anyway but watching the film open without it will piss me off a bit.
He haited dr no., Did he?? whys that. Dr no i think is one of the best bond films ever. Dr no is my favourite sean connery film.
I JUST MEAN THE GUN BARRELHAS BEEN OPENING SINCE DR NO. not talking about the actual film. He would be turning in his grave if he thoguht the gun barrel should open at the begining.
A few people have seen it and a bunch of people that have been asked on Twitter all said it was at the end.
When it was just the one guy I called BS but then I started reading more about it and sadly I think it's true.
Murdock out!
Its either true, or all reviews have been told to lie . lol