It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
007 usually breaks some rules, so I imagine Moore's Bond simply never retired at the mandatory age of 45. He was simply too good an agent to let go and too important to MI6 and the safety of the world.
AVTAK doesn't really run from Rog's age, none of his later films really do. I read somewhere—blog I think, maybe a forum post—the very good observation that Rog's final films each kind of had an absent/dead father motif running through them. That each of Melina's, Octopussy's and Stacey's fathers were dead was made explicit and somewhat relevant to the plots of FYEO, OP, and AVTAK. And Rog's presence was a little more paternal as a result (even if he does end up sleeping with them).
In AVTAK specifically his age is seemingly even more a potent contributor. It really lends itself to a sense of struggle in the film for Bond, putting him up against it, and that's what really makes it appealing as a kind of final assignment. That he really earns the victory. It's very satisfying as a viewer.
@barryt007, you mention how everyone who helps him ends up dead, which is definitely part of it. It's also the little things. Carrying Stacey out of the flames, he misses a rung on the fire truck ladder. Later, he breaks a ladder rung trying to climb out of the mine shaft. Ladders are very traditionally spoken of in relation to success. 'Climb the ladder.' Missing or worse breaking a rung is kind of symbolic of failure. Bond's 'missing a step' at this point. Etc. Also, Zorin's youth is a nice contrast for the mature OO7.
The sense of challenge is only heightened for the finale, where he's hanging from the rope (the mission 'hanging on a thread'), isolated and on his own as you noted @barryt007 by Barry's wonderful music, which is quite fateful.
It all comes together quite well and makes what would be a very satisfying final episode for Bond's career.
Excellent post! I do remember the audience having a lot of fun with AVTAK. Vocal cheers and laughs throughout. The beautiful shots of Bond dangling from the thread over San Francisco gave it an edge of your seat element.
AVATK felt like a final hurrah, although we knew there would be another film in a couple years. I can remember at the time thinking the M/Moneypenny/Q scenes being brought outside the office felt like a farewell party. Deep down I knew this was Roger's last, though at the same time I wouldn't have been too surprised if he signed for another.
I do like to think of AVTAK as Bond's retirement party, with TLD being set with Bond in mid-career.
I do now feel the urge to watch AVTAK again with all this in mind.
No,...this is Bond in his last and damn hard mission due to his age...watch it this way and i guarantee you will love it more and be right behind him,supporting him.
Almost one mission too far.
Spot on Matt..spot on....which is why i treasure this film,and see it as it is,one last (and nearly too much) mission to fulfill.
I've honestly really struggled to see the positives, and have been somewhat envious of those who enjoy this film. Being a huge fan of Sir Rog as Bond, I almost feel an obligation to find a way to see it in a new light and perhaps this will finally be the key to unlocking some enjoyment. In the past I've often scoffed at his age, which is made quite apparent in certain sequences already highlighted here as well as during the firetruck chase. I've also seen the age gap between Bond and Zorin as strange, but again, this new way of looking at things may improve my perceptions.
So I'll definitely check it out soon and see if anything changes.
That remains to be seen. I didn't like Logan, so if they try to emulate anything from that film I probably will pick AVTAK.
Honestly, I hope it stays that way. I don't even remotely like the idea of a LOGAN style film to finish of the Craig era.
I agree. AVTAK was the end of an era in more ways than one, I think; surely in terms of a certain sensibility in the series. TLD was apparently at one point going to be a reboot. Even if that didn't happen (and if it had I imagine this take on AVTAK as Bond's last mission might be more well held), the accompanying feeling leaks through in that final product regardless. There are aspects of TLD which definitely seem to anticipate the Brosnan era in a way that no Moore film did. AVTAK definitely feels like an end to something beyond just Moore.
Succinct and good way of framing it. Exactly what Bond must've been thinking as he held on to that rope.
Great thoughts, @mattjoes.
Bond is very British in AVTAK, you're right, and come to think of it so is the production. In fact, while this is perhaps true to the greatest degree in AVTAK, we could extend the thought out, as in the case of Bond the paternal figure, to each of Rog's last three films, occurring as they did during the heritage cycle: Not saying that Glen's films were heritage films. I mention it mainly to point toward a certain mindset in British film at the time. As Bond had aged, so had the production machine. Let's not forget that Rog could've played Bond in DN back in 1962, when Bond was a force of modernization. By 1985 he's become a bit old-fashioned. So in a way, with AVTAK, Bond's 'quintessential Britishness' has become intrinsically linked to his age. Another point in favor of this being Bond's last mission: it becomes the zenith of his national identity.
This is very good. I'd not thought of it this way. His disgust is certainly palpable. Different yet reminiscent of the attitude Rog takes in the dinner scene in TMWTGG.
Yes, the distaste for Zorin spills over into everything Zorin embodies. As you say a sort of change, a 'new type of evil.' But also an old type: Zorin's origins as a Nazi experiment lend a certain sense that the same evil which Rog-Bond--or which a conceivable man of his approximate age (as @ToTheRight said, a man who lived through WWII)--a certain sense that the same eivl which Rog-Bond could well have been fighting at the beginning of his career has returned. A return or a circle, which is a basic representation of time and its passing. As Zorin might say, that's rather neat don't you think?
I hope some of this does crack the film open a bit for you, if only a little. I think Rog's age and the Zorin-Bond age gap are issues whose experience can definitely be not only enhanced but cause for admiration. Stuff like the Beach Boys being used in the pre-titles or the police chief from the firetruck chase, on the other hand, are not easily overlooked, and can be understandably off-putting. But for my money the goofy offenses in this film are way less in number and degree than in any of Glen's others. In fact I think AVTAK is Glen's best. Not his most fun perhaps but his least affected.
I find the fire truck scene to be Roger's version of the DAF Mustang chase. It's not my favorite chase in the series, but I do find it more entertaining than the aerial CGI battle in QOS or the plane/snow bit in SPECTRE.
Not compared to MooreBonds last mission and connerybond came back UNOFFICIALLY for that other film in 1983.
Quite fitting too, since it borrows themes from Fleming s last novel.
I think it works as a sort of happy end for Bond, who clearly relishes his ersatz revenge, and spends much of the film totally dominating his opponent. I think when M calls with a job for him, Bond at that point can take it or leave it, just as he talked about in the film prior.
Indeed. It's the past returning to the present. Pretty cool, and I'm happy the Bond films made some use of this Nazi subject matter, which can provide a good basis for a thriller.
For what its worth, SPECTRE feels the same for me with Craig.
https://thejamesbonddossier.com/content/a-view-embraced-reflections-on-a-view-to-a-kill-at-30-years.htm
Very interesting!
Thanks for the link!
Thanks for that, @Escalus5. I will put it on the long list of Bond books to get to. Especially if the author is circling some of the same ideas touched on here.
Just a few days back I ordered The James Bond Movies of the 1980s. On the whole Glen's is my least favorite era of Bond, so I'm trying to see what all I might be missing to appreciate. I'll report back on any interesting AVTAK-related bits.
Good find! I especially liked this comment:
"Not once does Moore’s Bond slip into condescension as he assists Stacey. He plays the game with May Day and Fiona Fullerton’s Pola Ivanova, but has the moral wherewithal to drop the act with the woman evidently in need. It’s a terrific contrast; hardly overstated, but there to be discovered and appreciated."
And this along the subtlety of the St. John Smythe character. Rog once again showing the care he put into his performances. I'd say, though, watching their first scene together, that he does 'play the game' a bit, when doesn't yet know what's what with her (still in the Smythe character). But after that, yes.
Yes, that's what I was thinking too. Rewatched OP again just recently and it remains one of my favourite Bond films.
This fan obviously has a lot of bed space for Bond '85 and it is the proper starter pistol for CATCHING BULLETS. It is also film with a lot of personal echoes. But that aside, A VIEW TO A KILL is a fine, fun and rich adventure. If THE SPY WHO LOVED ME is *the* Seventies Bond film, then A VIEW TO A KILL - with its microchips, Van Halen hair, computer industries becoming global players, Grace Jones, airships, Duran Duran, tech-based cities and plot - is *the* Eighties Bond film. Bond films are not always fiercely contemporary. But A VIEW TO A KILL was.
Some forget or don't even fathom how A VIEW TO A KILL was everywhere in the hot summer of Live Aid, Duran Duran and those Grace Jones posters (and Smiths crisps promotions!). The film is the last Bond opus for a while that makes great play of its very real locations playing themselves - Paris, Ascot, San Francisco, Oakland, the Golden Gate Bridge. It is graced with one of the most beautiful John Barry scores, a cracking title tune, great costume choices (Emma Porteous's work for May Day never gets the recognition it deserves), a cracking turn from Patrick Macnee and one of the best Bond villains the wider fan populace has yet to notice in the vicious, sadistic and historically dubious Max Zorin. It is also the first Bond film where our man James is actually on Russian soil at last (albeit lensed in Iceland).
I had a violin solo of the Barry themes of the film play at my wedding - apt considering where we held it and its proximity to some key Bond studios and haunts. Non-fan folk knew the pieces instantly and the quiet love for A VIEW TO A KILL was clear.
Catching Stacey ...
Re-mining A VIEW TO A KILL...
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1217780421585638.1073741864.407779922585696&type=1&l=e460f1a681
How could it be, with Craig doing one more?