It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I don't think Eva is in this film though. She got her instagram account recently to promote Dumbo and that's why I think she's been active liking Bond stuff...
Eva Green’s Instagram appears to be mostly run by her fan site with the occasional post by Eva herself.
Why would they do that?
Let's set aside the pseudo-Sci-Fi element for a moment and assume that this cloning element is indeed part of the plot. Spectre has developed this technology. But it can't be cheap. So what do they do with it? Clone Madeleine and/or Vesper? For what purpose would that serve? That really makes no sense at all, tbh.
If there is a cloning element to this film, it would likely mirror The Boys from Brazil. The purposes were far more nefarious (and terrifying) than cloning an enemy agent's ex-girlfriend(s).
BTW: that entire film is available for free on You Tube.
It looks like
How do you reckon that, @antovolk?
That Daily Mail report specifically mentions whose house Moneypenny and Bond are visiting here, plus we know the numbers of the scenes they shot with Prince Charles there at Pinewood and Bond arriving at Whitehall, which would place them in the third act when comparing to the previous films.
It is the case if Bond25 is not much longer than previous films.
Thanks! And yes, you're quite right. And so is @Pavlo when he says the film probably won't be lengthy.
Why do all speak about Vesper return? Were some reasons for that?
There is another possibility, however. ;)
However remote. And unlikely. But given how talented our super sleuths have been on the internet at decoding the recent films' running orders based on these clapperboards, maybe EON/Cary are using a different system this time. I know it sounds like a stretch, but maybe there's a simple formula they use to convert later in the editing/production bay and these clapper numbers don't actually correspond to real scene numbers.
I've actually been thinking this, misdirection by EON, they had their last film well and truly spoiled by the hacking situation with various versions of the script online.
Maybe just maybe they are playing with us to ensure that even if a scene is seen filming in the press and on the net that the actual scene numbers are inconsequential to actual cronology of the finished film.
Like @AgentM72 possibly a stretch but they do seem to be going to lengths to make sure this one isn't spolied like its predecessor.
I think it has too be at least 20 minutes lomger than that, based on the nunber of locations and cast members. Don't forget they also have to catch us up to date at the start of this movie, as to where we are after the end of the SPECTRE, which most Bond films don't have to do. Theres a lot of story to tell here, they cannot simply rush through things.
Alternatively it could just be that he gets what he/the CIA need early on and bows out then while Bond stays on Malek's tail for personal reasons (probably because of him finding out he was also behind Madeline's death at the start). Just popped into my head because his role in the film doesn't seem to be being talked about much.
I hope this Vesper thing is just people reaching, because if it is in the movie, it will be daft to say the least. You can't bring back the leading lady from the last film (and possibly marry her) and then call back to Vesper from Casino in a flashback. It will undermine Madeline completely as a real love interest. I never truly believed she was anything special for Bond in Spectre, so they need to address that somehow in Bond 25 and bringing back Vesper will be the wrong way to go about it.
I don't mind them trying to tie up loose ends left from Spectre, but can we please stop calling back to past films every five minutes. Without some originality, the film will feel stale and Daniel deserves more than that if this is to be his final bow as 007.
I know it's only rumours, so I'm not going to worry about all that too much. I have faith in Eon, Cary and the amazing cast and crew to produce a top tier Bond film.
On a positive note, it's great to see Naomi as Moneypenny, she looks amazing, such a beautiful woman and great personality. A brilliant bit of casting as Moneypenny
An important character dies in every of Craigs films. So most likely, yes.
Love the look on Naomie’s face here!
?!?
Negative much? You don't seem to be having as much fun as the rest of us. And most of your negative ramblings aren't based on anything solid, just speculation and paranoia. And for that we've got the Production thread, which is full of that, as you very well know.
Nobody will ever top Lois Maxwell for me. It's impossible.
I do like Naomie Harris though – I just don't like her field involvement in SF, then having her, M and Q on their Scooby gang "mission" in SP.