No Time to Die production thread

11741751771791801208

Comments

  • Posts: 16,149
    Pavlo wrote: »

    Interesting that Ana has only one project to shoot next. It's about M. Monroe and I doubt that she has to be bold for it. Her only project in the process of making is B25 and maybe she did this with her hair for Bond.[/quote]

    In honor of her new iconic role, I hereby vote the Bond film be called......

    THE MOUTH OF MARILYN MONROE
  • edited July 2019 Posts: 6,709
    I think it's time for a homage to this poster...

    417o77z2LCL.jpg

    Except with Nomi in more stylish spy attire, of course.

    Are you insane?!? Of course it should be with the exact same attire!! ;)

    Then again, we'll probably get a dozen of gratuitous shots of Bond walking around shirtless, and all the Bond gir....Women will probably be dressed from toe to chin. As usual.
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    Univex wrote: »
    I think it's time for a homage to this poster...

    417o77z2LCL.jpg

    Except with Nomi in more stylish spy attire, of course.

    Are you insane?!? Of course it should be with the exact same attire!! ;)

    Then again, we'll probably get a dozen of gratuitous shots of Bond walking around shirtless, and all the Bond gir....Women will probably be dressed from toe to chin. As usual.

    Yes please :D
  • Posts: 678
    Univex wrote: »
    Are you insane?!? Of course it should be with the exact same attire!! ;)
    LMAO, you know it's not gonna happen in 2019! [-X
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    Univex wrote: »
    Are you insane?!? Of course it should be with the exact same attire!! ;)
    LMAO, you know it's not gonna happen in 2019! [-X

    How time flies
  • Posts: 125
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Maybe... they are filming Bond 25 & 26 back to back! :-O

    It's possible. That would be a great surprise.

    How long did they take to film SPECTRE?? Now with BOND 25 they're almost three months filming.

    ;)

  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited July 2019 Posts: 4,582
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    Why did arma de Armas shave her head?
    It's a bald cap (I think) because she's playing Marilyn Monroe.

    @FrankXavier in what film?
    Blondie: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1655389/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_1

    I think it's her first starring role (?) hope it goes well for her.

    Is this film even ready for production? I know IMDB is not the end all and be all, but there is no cast listed. And if they're shooting, we'd know more than this.

    Plus, it's unlikely would Ana be wearing a wig for this part. They'd color and restyle her hair.

    So...

    What we are seeing is likely for a publicity shot and NOT for filming.
  • Posts: 5,767
    I think it's time for a homage to this poster...

    417o77z2LCL.jpg

    Except with Nomi in more stylish spy attire, of course.
    Yes, it would be very cool to see Craig with legs that Long.

  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,767
    I was thinking they're gonna need a wider poster.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    I was thinking they're gonna need a wider poster.

    A bigger boat, rather.

    ;))
  • Posts: 678
    Fill her up, please.
  • Posts: 3,274
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    but I think a title reveal & teaser poster could be on the way very soon.
    Top Gun: Maverick is set for June 2020, and it already has a trailer out. Before they find the next to play Bond for Bond 26, MI:7 and MI:8 will have been made.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    Also probably Toy Story 5. But I'm not worried about that competition for Bond either.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    is there any competition bond 25 has to worry about or is it mostly clear?
  • Posts: 11,425
    Univex wrote: »
    Tell you what. Not that many women can pull that off, still being pretty with no hair. Lupita Nyong'o, Natalie Portman, Ana de Armas, Charlize Theron can, just to name a few.

    Sinead O'Connor?
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,195
    TripAces wrote: »
    Here’s what we know...

    Casting call for young lea, says she needs to be able to swim.

    A month later a young blonde girl is seen in Norway on set being chased. Scene ends with her falling into the ice water. There was actual video of this..

    Pinewood filmed an underwater scene and it involved a young child. It was on AJB007 with the release forms for a child doing water scenes.


    I mean.. Sounds like there’s a flashback scene with a young Maddie and you guys are in denial.


    I’m not a big fan of this but also we have a black female 007. So at this point I could careless.

    Or it is her daughter, which seems much more plausible.

    Yeah but she can’t have a daughter that old?

    So we’re back to a clone. 😏
    Getafix wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Tell you what. Not that many women can pull that off, still being pretty with no hair. Lupita Nyong'o, Natalie Portman, Ana de Armas, Charlize Theron can, just to name a few.

    Sinead O'Connor?

    In her younger yes, O’Connor was very attractive, with delicate features; she definitely wore bald well.

  • Posts: 6,709
    talos7 wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    Tell you what. Not that many women can pull that off, still being pretty with no hair. Lupita Nyong'o, Natalie Portman, Ana de Armas, Charlize Theron can, just to name a few.

    Sinead O'Connor?

    In her younger yes, O’Connor was very attractive, with delicate features; she definitely wore bald well.

    Yes, definitely not now ;)
  • Posts: 1,680

    Top Gun: Maverick is set for June 2020, and it already has a trailer out. Before they find the next to play Bond for Bond 26, MI:7 and MI:8 will have been made. [/quote]
    Eon can’t seem to grasp this
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited July 2019 Posts: 8,205
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    Eon can’t seem to grasp this

    Eon don't care what other studios are doing, nor should they.
  • edited July 2019 Posts: 15
    It seems clear that EON are operating at their own pace. Every time Marvel announces their new line up, which they just did, or MI and F&F release a new one every other year, some Bond fans get really angry at the wasted potential of their favorite franchise. It’s a cycle, really. And unless someone else purchase the rights to Bond, it’s gonna remain like this for the foreseeable future.
  • Posts: 2,598
    Jack_Wade wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Maybe... they are filming Bond 25 & 26 back to back! :-O

    It's possible. That would be a great surprise.

    How long did they take to film SPECTRE?? Now with BOND 25 they're almost three months filming.

    ;)

    That would be fantastic. Then, we could see Craig in two more. It would be a damn wise move seeing they constantly seem to be plagued by delays.
  • Posts: 3,327
    I’ve seen every Bond film in the cinema, usually on day one, since GE and was a fan of Bond films before then, and for the first time ever I’m completely unexcited about a new Bond film. Not just because of this latest thing, it just feels like yet another blow against the character. I never thought I’d be pining for the Brosnan era, but here I am. I loved Casino Royale, I thought it was an amazing Bond film, and greatly looked forward to what promised to be an exciting new era of Bond films with a fantastic new Bond actor. Constant “personal” storylines, small stakes, a depressed, navel gazing Bond who seems to be constantly rogue or retired and making mistakes and learning lessons and must be about the crappiest agent MI6 ever produced, QUANTUM being a damp squib and even the return of SPECTRE and Blofeld being totally lame and now we’ve got another movie with a retired Bond, a female 007 and a movie that will “reflect the metoo movement”... Its all just been so disappointing.

    Agreed 100%. I'm sick of Bond having personal issues, family angst, unnecessary family backstories involving Blofeld - basically rewriting anything Fleming did, and discarding precious material that still hasn't been used.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    Bounine wrote: »
    Jack_Wade wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Maybe... they are filming Bond 25 & 26 back to back! :-O

    It's possible. That would be a great surprise.

    How long did they take to film SPECTRE?? Now with BOND 25 they're almost three months filming.

    ;)

    That would be fantastic. Then, we could see Craig in two more. It would be a damn wise move seeing they constantly seem to be plagued by delays.

    Plagued By Delay.

    A good title methinks. Because the villain will be called Dr. Delay, you see. ;))
  • Posts: 5,767
    I’ve seen every Bond film in the cinema, usually on day one, since GE and was a fan of Bond films before then, and for the first time ever I’m completely unexcited about a new Bond film. Not just because of this latest thing, it just feels like yet another blow against the character. I never thought I’d be pining for the Brosnan era, but here I am. I loved Casino Royale, I thought it was an amazing Bond film, and greatly looked forward to what promised to be an exciting new era of Bond films with a fantastic new Bond actor. Constant “personal” storylines, small stakes, a depressed, navel gazing Bond who seems to be constantly rogue or retired and making mistakes and learning lessons and must be about the crappiest agent MI6 ever produced, QUANTUM being a damp squib and even the return of SPECTRE and Blofeld being totally lame and now we’ve got another movie with a retired Bond, a female 007 and a movie that will “reflect the metoo movement”... Its all just been so disappointing.

    Agreed 100%. I'm sick of Bond having personal issues, family angst, unnecessary family backstories involving Blofeld - basically rewriting anything Fleming did, and discarding precious material that still hasn't been used.
    And most of all being boring.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    boldfinger wrote: »
    I’ve seen every Bond film in the cinema, usually on day one, since GE and was a fan of Bond films before then, and for the first time ever I’m completely unexcited about a new Bond film. Not just because of this latest thing, it just feels like yet another blow against the character. I never thought I’d be pining for the Brosnan era, but here I am. I loved Casino Royale, I thought it was an amazing Bond film, and greatly looked forward to what promised to be an exciting new era of Bond films with a fantastic new Bond actor. Constant “personal” storylines, small stakes, a depressed, navel gazing Bond who seems to be constantly rogue or retired and making mistakes and learning lessons and must be about the crappiest agent MI6 ever produced, QUANTUM being a damp squib and even the return of SPECTRE and Blofeld being totally lame and now we’ve got another movie with a retired Bond, a female 007 and a movie that will “reflect the metoo movement”... Its all just been so disappointing.

    Agreed 100%. I'm sick of Bond having personal issues, family angst, unnecessary family backstories involving Blofeld - basically rewriting anything Fleming did, and discarding precious material that still hasn't been used.
    And most of all being boring.

    Yeah, Licence To Kill, Goldeneye and OHMSS should have never been made.

  • Posts: 5,767
    @JamesCraig, Point taken.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    boldfinger wrote: »
    @JamesCraig, Point taken.

    Personal stuff, family business.

    The only thing I agree with you two on is that Blofeld angle. What on earth where they thinking?
  • ResurrectionResurrection Kolkata, India
    Posts: 2,541
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    boldfinger wrote: »
    @JamesCraig, Point taken.

    Personal stuff, family business.

    The only thing I agree with you two on is that Blofeld angle. What on earth where they thinking?

    May be they had Martini too too much
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,546
    25 films in they wanted to do something different, they took a risk. Opposite end of the Spectre-um, they’re just remaking Dr. No over and over again.
    I don’t love the adopted brother angle but I don’t fault them for trying something different.
  • edited July 2019 Posts: 5,767
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    boldfinger wrote: »
    @JamesCraig, Point taken.

    Personal stuff, family business.

    The only thing I agree with you two on is that Blofeld angle. What on earth where they thinking?
    Again goes to Show how important the execution is. OHMSS or LTK at no Point remind in the slightest of a Soap opera.



    25 films in they wanted to do something different, they took a risk. Opposite end of the Spectre-um, they’re just remaking Dr. No over and over again.
    I don’t love the adopted brother angle but I don’t fault them for trying something different.
    What´s obvious is that many of These personal Things just take up time and space in the movie, but have no real meaning for the Story. Again, I´m sure better execution could make it work better. LTK as well as OHMSS are among my favorite Bond films.

    CR was a massive success. If they would have built on that more they wouldn´t be doing DN all the time either, and they would have had massive opportunities for character development without taking too big risks.
Sign In or Register to comment.