Reporting For Duty
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
No Time to Die production thread
Well she's German apparently. So might have had issues with the accent.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Schiff
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Schiff
Since when is dubbing an Actor any Kind of Problem on a Bond production?Well she's German apparently. So might have had issues with the accent.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Schiff
You do know that this is a Bond movie, right? She will most likely die or fail miserably. No way that Bond 25 ends with her as 007.Pierce2Daniel wrote: »I'm looking so forward to Lashana Lynch absolutely stealing Bond 25
Denbigh
UK
50 years later and beauty still prevails over acting talent. Great *sarcasm intended*
And people stop trying to retcon Lynch just because you don't find her attractive or because your balls can't handle a woman being 007 for one film, even though James Bond is still the main character..
I actually don't find any of the actors who played James Bond attractive and they still played "the most handsome spy" so stop it...
...and anyway you'd probably find that more people find her attractive than don't. Look if you don't find her attractive. Fine, but don't start acting like they should've cast someone else just for that reason. It's just shallow and offers no interesting argument.
And again JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
And people stop trying to retcon Lynch just because you don't find her attractive or because your balls can't handle a woman being 007 for one film, even though James Bond is still the main character..
I actually don't find any of the actors who played James Bond attractive and they still played "the most handsome spy" so stop it...
...and anyway you'd probably find that more people find her attractive than don't. Look if you don't find her attractive. Fine, but don't start acting like they should've cast someone else just for that reason. It's just shallow and offers no interesting argument.
And again JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
What people want has nothing to do with what people think will be the most likely outcome. People - Bond "fans" - rooting for Bond to die and her to be 007 at both the beginning and end? Now that's "wishful thinking" ;-)JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
Denbigh
UK
See now you're contradicting yourself because by saying that "She's definitely not going to be 007 at both the beginning and end", you're literally presenting your opinion as fact, when you're as close to production as the rest of us.What people want has nothing to do with what people think will be the most likely outcome. People rooting for Bond to die and her to be 007 at both the beginning and end? Now that's "wishful thinking" ;-)JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
Anything can happen in this film. No-one's opinion changes that. She could be 007 for the entire film, she could not. I honestly couldn't give a crap about whether James Bond gets his 007 status back, because with or without it, he's the same bloody character, but they could give it back to him. Who knows? That's the point I'm trying to make. Just stop saying "Oh they're not gonna do this" or "Oh no they're gonna do it like this" because we don't have a clue.
See now you're contradicting yourself because by saying that "She's definitely not going to be 007 at both the beginning and end", you're literally presenting your opinion as fact,What people want has nothing to do with what people think will be the most likely outcome. People rooting for Bond to die and her to be 007 at both the beginning and end? Now that's "wishful thinking" ;-)JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
Sorry, dude. I refuse to write "in my opinion" after most of my sentences.
CraigMooreOHMSS
Dublin, Ireland
See now you're contradicting yourself because by saying that "She's definitely not going to be 007 at both the beginning and end", you're literally presenting your opinion as fact,What people want has nothing to do with what people think will be the most likely outcome. People rooting for Bond to die and her to be 007 at both the beginning and end? Now that's "wishful thinking" ;-)JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
Sorry, dude. I refuse to write "in my opinion" after most of my sentences.
You don't need to, either. Nor does anyone else. It's fairly clear most things here are written as opinion.
Lets not allow this to escalate into another silly argument.
Denbigh
UK
CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »See now you're contradicting yourself because by saying that "She's definitely not going to be 007 at both the beginning and end", you're literally presenting your opinion as fact,What people want has nothing to do with what people think will be the most likely outcome. People rooting for Bond to die and her to be 007 at both the beginning and end? Now that's "wishful thinking" ;-)JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT HER TO BE, DOESN'T MEAN SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE 007 AT THE END. WISHFUL THINKING IS NOT FACT.
Sorry, dude. I refuse to write "in my opinion" after most of my sentences.
You don't need to, either. Nor does anyone else. It's fairly clear most things here are written as opinion.
Lets not allow this to escalate into another silly argument.
Fair play @CraigMooreOHMSS. You do you @Zekidk :)
marketto007 wrote: »
007 would be a very lazy title haha :D
That would be the worst thing do after making it so obvious you didn't have one to then call it something that any of the James Bond films could've been called.
Comments
She's 003?
@Pierce2Daniel yeah I think they should swap.
No and it's not going to happen.
I repeat: time for some big B25 news because... X( [-X
Some words from Naomi Harris regarding B25.
I still maintain the opinion I'd only want that title if B25 turns out to be not just Craig's last outing, but the final Bond film altogether.
Well.....
rumour is the film has a 'Logan' feel and that it may...
https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/28/rami-malek-killed-off-grisliest-death-007-history-actor-plays-villain-9329707/
And considering we know Bond will be dealing with depression, it would seem that Fukunaga has decided to go down the Luke Skywalker route (who had depression and eventually committed suicide by overdosing on the force) and have Bond die.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/film/james-bond-battle-depression-grief-17281180
Are those two your primary sources?
Where does that "Logan feel" rumour come from?
Personally I don't feel Bond should too closely follow the trends of inferior franchises.
Yes. IMO, the Star Wars and X-Men franchises are massively inferior to Bond.
In addition, the Craig Bonds seem to be compared unfavorably to the other franchises that's influenced them: QoS to Bourne, SF to TDK trilogy, and SP to Austin Powers.
I prefer Bond series to remain true to itself.
And MR to Star Wars, LTK to Miami Vice...
True, and both of those Bonds resulted in follow ups that went back to Bond's basics.
LTK was quite "basic". Brothul, but very close to how Fleming envisioned the character.
Luckily none of Craig's outings went too "overboard".
Also, I don't like the Valhalla. It looks like a Pagani Zonda (a car which never appealed to make). Thank heavens for the inclusion of the V8 vantage. :-?
You might want to sit this one out, there's also a female 007.
It's called 007. Mark my words.
Le sigh.
Why wasn´t she cast for the role of Nomi? She´s gorgeous! And a race car Driver! Unbelievable!
How so???