It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
https://hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/warren-letter-amazon-mgm-ftc-1234975777/
I think Bardem and Dench got some consideration for Skyfall. I wouldn't be surprised if they were in the top 10 or 15 for Best Supporting Actor/Actress voting in 2013.
Not that Bond needs Oscar nominations, but there have been action spectacle or popular fare nominated for Best Picture in recent years, e,g, 1917, Black Panther, Dunkirk, Mad Max: Fury Road, The Martian, Gravity, Captain Phillips, Argo, to name a few.
True. He did get that BAFTA, after all.
I could imagine that, yes.
https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/james-bond-critical-juncture-newsupdate/
“[MGM bosses] Mike and Pam understand that we are at a critical juncture and that the continuing success of the James Bond series is dependent on us getting the next iteration right and will give us the support we need to do this,” said Broccoli and Wilson.
Broccoli and Wilson offered some words of comfort, revealing that “Amazon has assured” them that 007’s missions will remain on the big screen, while throwing their support behind Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy’s leadership of MGM.
“Our hope is that they [Amazon] will empower Mike and Pam to continue to run MGM unencumbered,” they added.
Of course this was the codename ...
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/amazon-james-bond-books-publishing-rights-313694/amp/
https://reuters.com/business/ftc-prepares-possible-challenge-amazons-85-bln-mgm-deal-information-2022-03-01
A Lego Bond movie ? It could really click with the youth audience ! ...(waiting for that to sink in)...hey, hook 'em young.
On the other hand, I can imagine a Lego James Bond film being fun. It’s not like EON hasn’t licensed Bond to Lego either, since they put this out:
I actually got this for Christmas, and plan to assemble after I move to a new house in a week.
https://hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/writers-guild-west-labor-coalition-push-ftc-to-challenge-amazons-mgm-buy-exclusive-1235116937/
https://www.filmstories.co.uk/news/every-007-film-to-launch-on-amazon-prime-for-a-short-window-of-time/
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/mgm-shake-up-michael-de-luca-pam-abdy-exiting-as-amazon-era-begins-1235136211/
I wonder if this means we'll get the now traditional "NEXT BOND FILM DELAYED" announcement soon?
The two people that Eon have worked quite closely with, and indeed were called out by BB as being the two people that will give them the time and space to move forward, are now gone. In their place will be Amazon allies…
And now Amazon can put the screws to Eon to “consider” opening the IP (spin-offs and series, all the things Eon has said they’re not interested in).
If this is as bad as I’m guessing it is, I wouldn’t be surprised if Eon dug in their heels on moving forward. After all, the tables have been turned— two allies of Eon are being replaced by Amazon hires…
When I first heard about this, my stomach turned.
In all seriousness though, it'd be kind of funny if the next Bond villain was a wealthy industrialist like Goldfinger or Drax considering all this.
People have been saying "Do Elon" for quite some time and none of the big tech founders seem interested in making themselves seem any less Bond-villainy.
Happens all the time in Hollywood.
Bond has survived, and thrived, with various executive MGM overlords. James Bond will return.
I'm not sure whether this is bad or simply neutral. Much like the Discovery acquisition of Warner, I think management shakeups/realignments were expected. Paramount just recently went through the same spasms. If Bond was a much smaller franchise, I'd be afraid that theatrical was over. But there's still too much money on the table for theatrical to completely go away.
Studios will definitely be more judicious with what pictures get theatrically released but Bond, Star Wars, Marvel and the like are too profitable. I mean Spider-Man just made nearly 2 billion theatrically and NTTD--when all receipts are updated--may be at $780m+. Bond is still the second biggest theatrical release of the last two years.
Another way to look at this is to consider the amount of misses De Luca and Abdy collected outside of NTTD. If memory serves, MGM invested in a lot of talent, behind and in front of the camera, over the last few years with little financial or awards success. So, replacing them isn't like replacing Bob Iger.
I mean, Amazon bought the Washington Post and the Washington Post still prints newspapers. Amazon bought Whole Foods and people still shop in stores. Amazon bought ComiXology and comic books are still shipped to newsstands.