EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards

1222324252628»

Comments

  • Posts: 2,196
    007HallY wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?

    Barbra had this weird thing where she didnt want the Bond video games / toys to feature guns. Lego got around it by including an extra “exhaust piece” in the DB5 kit that doubled as a gun. For the games, I guess she relented on it in the end. But it is weird nevertheless.
  • edited 3:20pm Posts: 4,662
    Quiet at work so forgive multiple thought dumps...over the years within the forum, there has been much discussion re new Bonds (black, female, older, young etc etc) and the general (and understandable) reaction has been "thats not Bond" and I completlely get that, you don't mess with an icon. But what about a black double 0 agent, female double 0 agent, etc etc, the idea that all of the double O agents are replicants of Bond is bonkers as is that they are sitting doing nothing whilst Bond is out there, saving the World, MI6 would have a range of agents with a range and skills to fit the mission, it's a perfectly believable narrative. Also believable is that, on occcasion, one agent would have to assist another (either planned or as emergency), we saw this in Goldeneye and it was just accepted. From a script writers perspective and from a jo public one, these options are a gift (if treated with care and respect), the universe is there already, waiting to be explored.
  • edited 3:45pm Posts: 4,670
    Mallory wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?

    Barbra had this weird thing where she didnt want the Bond video games / toys to feature guns. Lego got around it by including an extra “exhaust piece” in the DB5 kit that doubled as a gun. For the games, I guess she relented on it in the end. But it is weird nevertheless.

    To be honest I can sympathise with the gun thing with toys, even if just to avoid controversy in America alone. Video games not so much (they tend to be more for teens, often older ones, and beyond anyway).
  • edited 3:49pm Posts: 474
    mtm wrote: »
    Does the writer of that piece mean 'vitriolic'? Seems the wrong word there.

    I just listened to this week's Rest Is Entertainment where they talked about the situation, and I took it with a pinch of salt to be honest. The main thrust was that Broccoli (who had supposedly been in charge since 'mid way through the Brosnan films) was too attached to Craig and let Craig lead the decision of killing Bond off and couldn't think of a way out of it, and it sounded like Marina Hyde had more been reading forums than talking to people in the know. There's no 'way out of it' to find: he's just a new version of Bond, same as with the case for so many other characters. It's quite a puzzling conversation.

    What I do buy is that she was in a funk and couldn't think of a new spin on it exciting enough to actually want to make- I can totally buy that after doing your ultimate version of it for the last twenty years that the enthusiasm barrel rather runs dry. It doesn't mean it can't be done, but it probably does need someone else who's excited to make something like, say, GoldenEye again- but these guys have done that and there's not much in the way of creative hunger left if you've been there and done that, especially if you have taken it in a creative direction and had massive success with it. No-one is expecting Chris Nolan to ever make a new Batman film again, with another new spin on it, for example.

    Yes, her enthusiasm had gone. The fact she killed off her intellectual property is the evidence of little to no enthusiasm.

    Consider this....

    I doubt Lucasfilm would kill off Indiana Jones in one film then be motivated to reboot the franchise in the next film.

    I doubt Warner Bros would kill off Harry Potter in one film then be motivated to reboot the franchise in the next film.

    Everything that happened with NTTD is consistent with the outcome in 2025. Craig gone, Bond dead, Eon with no enthusiasm to continue = no development of Bond 26 = Amazon taking over.

    And, of course, her obvious lack of enthusiasm to carry on would have been made stronger when Amazon offered the cash. it's very easy to go from "I'm kinda unsure if I want to carry on" to absolute conviction: "yes, I've had enough, I quit!" when Amazon are offering to pay you a billion dollars to quit. Kinda makes the decision a lot easier.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,181
    bondywondy wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Does the writer of that piece mean 'vitriolic'? Seems the wrong word there.

    I just listened to this week's Rest Is Entertainment where they talked about the situation, and I took it with a pinch of salt to be honest. The main thrust was that Broccoli (who had supposedly been in charge since 'mid way through the Brosnan films) was too attached to Craig and let Craig lead the decision of killing Bond off and couldn't think of a way out of it, and it sounded like Marina Hyde had more been reading forums than talking to people in the know. There's no 'way out of it' to find: he's just a new version of Bond, same as with the case for so many other characters. It's quite a puzzling conversation.

    What I do buy is that she was in a funk and couldn't think of a new spin on it exciting enough to actually want to make- I can totally buy that after doing your ultimate version of it for the last twenty years that the enthusiasm barrel rather runs dry. It doesn't mean it can't be done, but it probably does need someone else who's excited to make something like, say, GoldenEye again- but these guys have done that and there's not much in the way of creative hunger left if you've been there and done that, especially if you have taken it in a creative direction and had massive success with it. No-one is expecting Chris Nolan to ever make a new Batman film again, with another new spin on it, for example.

    Yes, her enthusiasm had gone. The fact she killed off her intellectual property is the evidence of little to no enthusiasm.

    Consider this....

    I doubt Lucasfilm would kill off Indiana Jones in one film then be motivated to reboot the franchise in the next film.

    I doubt Warner Bros would kill off Harry Potter in one film then be motivated to reboot the franchise in the next film.

    Indeed, and Spielberg had Indy ride into the sunset in the last film he intended to make with the character- it took 14 years for him to be persuaded to come back, and many people felt his heart wasn't in it when he did. Chris Nolan 'killed off'/retired Batman in his last film, and arguably had said all he had to say with that character. I don't think that, or Indy riding into the sunset, was a sign of lack of enthusiasm with the character while they were making those films: it was just the story they was telling at the time.

    When I see folks slagging them off for that then the criticism of Dame Barbara will seem more balanced.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 607
    007HallY wrote: »
    Mallory wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?

    Barbra had this weird thing where she didnt want the Bond video games / toys to feature guns. Lego got around it by including an extra “exhaust piece” in the DB5 kit that doubled as a gun. For the games, I guess she relented on it in the end. But it is weird nevertheless.

    To be honest I can sympathise with the gun thing with toys, even if just to avoid controversy in America alone. Video games not so much (they tend to be more for teens, often older ones, and beyond anyway).

    I can tell you, there is no "gun" toy problem in America. I know outlets like the Guardian and BBC like amplifying any problem because it's a national sport to turn your nose up at America. My point is it's not like they stopped selling Nerf or G.I. Joe in the toy aisles.
  • edited 7:09pm Posts: 4,670
    007HallY wrote: »
    Mallory wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?

    Barbra had this weird thing where she didnt want the Bond video games / toys to feature guns. Lego got around it by including an extra “exhaust piece” in the DB5 kit that doubled as a gun. For the games, I guess she relented on it in the end. But it is weird nevertheless.

    To be honest I can sympathise with the gun thing with toys, even if just to avoid controversy in America alone. Video games not so much (they tend to be more for teens, often older ones, and beyond anyway).

    I can tell you, there is no "gun" toy problem in America. I know outlets like the Guardian and BBC like amplifying any problem because it's a national sport to turn your nose up at America. My point is it's not like they stopped selling Nerf or G.I. Joe in the toy aisles.

    To be clear I don’t have an opinion on this either way. I’d side with the opinion toy guns don’t automatically turn kids into school shooters at least! But Bond is a very high profile franchise, much more so than GI Joe, so I can understand concerns that selling realistic looking toy guns in briefcases (so different to nerf guns) to children might not get the best press from everyone nowadays. On a slightly more personal level I sympathise with someone disliking kids playing with toy guns based on their own moral opinion of this. Where I come from with this is hearing anecdotes from my dad about my late Grandad who served as a young man in WW2. He disliked both his sons playing with toy guns or playing ‘soldiers’ or whatever because he thought it glamourised war I guess, rightly or wrongly. So like I said I can sympathise.
  • Posts: 99
    BB and MGW walked a tightrope and with phenomenal success overall. It’s not THE franchise, it’s THEIR franchise
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited 7:34pm Posts: 4,621
    bondywondy wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Does the writer of that piece mean 'vitriolic'? Seems the wrong word there.

    I just listened to this week's Rest Is Entertainment where they talked about the situation, and I took it with a pinch of salt to be honest. The main thrust was that Broccoli (who had supposedly been in charge since 'mid way through the Brosnan films) was too attached to Craig and let Craig lead the decision of killing Bond off and couldn't think of a way out of it, and it sounded like Marina Hyde had more been reading forums than talking to people in the know. There's no 'way out of it' to find: he's just a new version of Bond, same as with the case for so many other characters. It's quite a puzzling conversation.

    What I do buy is that she was in a funk and couldn't think of a new spin on it exciting enough to actually want to make- I can totally buy that after doing your ultimate version of it for the last twenty years that the enthusiasm barrel rather runs dry. It doesn't mean it can't be done, but it probably does need someone else who's excited to make something like, say, GoldenEye again- but these guys have done that and there's not much in the way of creative hunger left if you've been there and done that, especially if you have taken it in a creative direction and had massive success with it. No-one is expecting Chris Nolan to ever make a new Batman film again, with another new spin on it, for example.

    Yes, her enthusiasm had gone. The fact she killed off her intellectual property is the evidence of little to no enthusiasm.

    Consider this....

    I doubt Lucasfilm would kill off Indiana Jones in one film then be motivated to reboot the franchise in the next film.

    I doubt Warner Bros would kill off Harry Potter in one film then be motivated to reboot the franchise in the next film.

    Everything that happened with NTTD is consistent with the outcome in 2025. Craig gone, Bond dead, Eon with no enthusiasm to continue = no development of Bond 26 = Amazon taking over.

    And, of course, her obvious lack of enthusiasm to carry on would have been made stronger when Amazon offered the cash. it's very easy to go from "I'm kinda unsure if I want to carry on" to absolute conviction: "yes, I've had enough, I quit!" when Amazon are offering to pay you a billion dollars to quit. Kinda makes the decision a lot easier.

    I am reminded of the old Nilsson song: "I can't live...if living is without yooooou!" She decided that she could not do another Bond film without Daniel in it. And so his suggestion that the character die in the end made perfect sense to her.

    It actually all seems so sad and understandable, and adds an important para-textual element to the entire Craig era. She was secretly (and maybe not so secretly) in love with him.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,331
    007HallY wrote: »
    I don’t know how much some of the stuff would appeal to the right audiences, especially in certain countries (I can’t see a Bond briefcase with a small gun inside for the 5-10 demographics being something a big American company like Amazon would be eager to release in said country. I suspect there’d be some overblown controversy, and I think that’s been the case since the 90s. Could be wrong on all counts though). Maybe the toy gadgets if the films lean into them more this time round…. But it’s still quite niche, and as I said I think Bond tends to appeal to kids getting into their teens.

    That was my experience with Bond. Much more appealing as a 13 year old than as an 8 year old.
    QBranch wrote: »
    Oh there's heaps. I have most of the Moore and Brosnan era toys now. With Moore it was Vanity Fair/Imperial Toys/Zeon, while Brosnan's were mainly Ericsson and Digital Dream. Then between Brosnan and Craig you had a lot of gear from IMC, first released in Spain, then redesigned for the international market.

    Were any of these Brosnan era toys sold and marketed in the USA, or was that just an international market thing? I used to watch endless hours of Nickelodeon, Fox Kids, and Kids WB programming I don’t remember seeing much of anything Bond related advertised on those children programming blocks on TV besides the inescapable GoldenEye 64 game.
  • Posts: 12,598
    I was 11 when I first started really getting into Bond. It's been there for me for so many of my highs and lows in life, and I just feel down thinking about how now it'll never be the same. What a run it was, though. I feel impressed and grateful with all that we got, still.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,507
    Everyone, we have much bigger problems with Amazon taking over and the franchise falling into the hands of the "suits"!

    We've talked all of these other issues (Bond's color, Campbell's age, "Is Barbara in love with Daniel?", "Who's responsible for killing Bond? Daniel, Barbara, Danny Boyle, Danny Partridge?") to death. I don't see any new perspectives on any of this, from any angle.

    This is all just The Sun or some other tabloid looking for clickbait.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited 8:34pm Posts: 17,181
    007HallY wrote: »
    Mallory wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?

    Barbra had this weird thing where she didnt want the Bond video games / toys to feature guns. Lego got around it by including an extra “exhaust piece” in the DB5 kit that doubled as a gun. For the games, I guess she relented on it in the end. But it is weird nevertheless.

    To be honest I can sympathise with the gun thing with toys, even if just to avoid controversy in America alone. Video games not so much (they tend to be more for teens, often older ones, and beyond anyway).

    I can tell you, there is no "gun" toy problem in America. I know outlets like the Guardian and BBC like amplifying any problem because it's a national sport to turn your nose up at America. My point is it's not like they stopped selling Nerf or G.I. Joe in the toy aisles.

    Unnecessary little rant there.
    007HallY wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Mallory wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?

    Barbra had this weird thing where she didnt want the Bond video games / toys to feature guns. Lego got around it by including an extra “exhaust piece” in the DB5 kit that doubled as a gun. For the games, I guess she relented on it in the end. But it is weird nevertheless.

    To be honest I can sympathise with the gun thing with toys, even if just to avoid controversy in America alone. Video games not so much (they tend to be more for teens, often older ones, and beyond anyway).

    I can tell you, there is no "gun" toy problem in America. I know outlets like the Guardian and BBC like amplifying any problem because it's a national sport to turn your nose up at America. My point is it's not like they stopped selling Nerf or G.I. Joe in the toy aisles.

    To be clear I don’t have an opinion on this either way. I’d side with the opinion toy guns don’t automatically turn kids into school shooters at least! But Bond is a very high profile franchise, much more so than GI Joe, so I can understand concerns that selling realistic looking toy guns in briefcases (so different to nerf guns) to children might not get the best press from everyone nowadays. On a slightly more personal level I sympathise with someone disliking kids playing with toy guns based on their own moral opinion of this. Where I come from with this is hearing anecdotes from my dad about my late Grandad who served as a young man in WW2. He disliked both his sons playing with toy guns or playing ‘soldiers’ or whatever because he thought it glamourised war I guess, rightly or wrongly. So like I said I can sympathise.

    It's interesting that on some products there's been a version of the 007 logo without the gun part, I forgot what I've seen that on now; I think some shoes or trainers, maybe the sunglasses? I don't know if it's a choice of the brand owners or licensees, I guess the style guide probably has an option for either version. I suppose it makes sense if you don't want a little gun on your product, but it might purely be an aesthetic thing, who knows. It does make the logo taller so a designer might just use it to fit the available space better.

    From memory I remember the gun-less 007 logo popping up a lot on the merch for DAD at the time too.
  • meshypushymeshypushy Ireland
    Posts: 159
    I wonder where Amazon will stand on using commercial partners to fund production (product placement etc)? If they decided to reduce / remove this, it could give them more of blank slate creatively (maybe doing a period piece etc). Clearly they will want return on their investment but I wonder if they have broader ideas around how to monetise the IP than maximising product placement and licensed tat? (EoN style)
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,181
    I think the thing with the product placement is that in some cases it helps them make the movie: like that thing with all of the bespoke Aston Martin 'DB5's made for the last film- that would have cost megabucks and I think the idea is that Aston Martin make that sort of thing for the film, thus saving Eon some of the budget. So I expect similar sort of stuff like that will stay.
  • meshypushymeshypushy Ireland
    Posts: 159
    Yes but Amazon may not need the cash - they could free themselves and fund production themselves. It’s an interesting one to consider what could be possible with that model.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,331
    meshypushy wrote: »
    Yes but Amazon may not need the cash - they could free themselves and fund production themselves. It’s an interesting one to consider what could be possible with that model.

    It’s something I thought of even when the sale was happening in 2021. Eon really used to depend on the product placement especially when MGM was having trouble with funds. With Amazon’s resources and Eon’s experience it would be a formidable force. Oh well!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,181
    meshypushy wrote: »
    Yes but Amazon may not need the cash - they could free themselves and fund production themselves. It’s an interesting one to consider what could be possible with that model.

    Yeah maybe, they did apparently spend megabucks on that awful Christmas movie even though it didn't look it.
    I must admit I quite like the product placement, which is a weird thing to admit! :) It sort of reminds me of how Fleming always went on about brand names in the books.
Sign In or Register to comment.